Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

IPAP > Research Evaluation Block 1 > Flashcards

Research Evaluation Block 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Prevalence

A

Number of occurrences at one particular time

Obtained from cross-sectional studies, no timeline, only snap shot in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Incidence

A

Occurrence, rate, frequency of disease

Obtained from Cohort Studies and follows cohort through time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Correlation Coefficient

A

“r”
Absolute value of coefficient telling how strong relationship is between variables
-1 - 1, closer to them is stronger relationship
Closer to 0, weaker relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Relative Risk

A

Likelihood an event will occur w/in a population
Experimental Event Rate/Control Event Rate
Makes insignificant findings APPEAR significant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Sensitivity

A

People w/ disease compared to people with a positive test for the disease
(tests ability to identify correctly who have the test)
Rules out disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Specificity

A

People without disease who have a negative test
(ability of test to correctly ID those who don’t have the disease)
Rules disease in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define Two-Stage testing

A

Calculates net sensitivity and net specificity of using both tests in sequence
After completion, loss of net sensitivity and gain of specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Simultaneous Testing

A

PT is positive if tested pos on one or more tests
PT is negative if tested neg on ALL tests
Net gain in sensitivity and loss of specificity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define External Validity

A

Ability to apply results obtained from studied population to broader populations
AKA generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define Internal Validity

A

W/in confines of study, results appear to be accurate and investigators interpretation is supported

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Confidence Interval

A

More important than p-value and a better determination of significance
95% CI= 95% certain that true value is within the CI range, narrower the better

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define Number Needed to Treat

A

of PTs needed to receive new intervention instead of standard alternative in order for ONE additional patient to benefit, used for prophylactic measures
Very effective treatments range: 2-4
10 or less for therapy
20 or less for prevention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define Number Needed to Harm

A

Treatment is detrimental

Will have negative absolute risk reduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define P-Value

A

Probability level, chance of random error

Likelihood that difference observed between two interventions happened by chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Efficacy Trial

A

Attempt to learn if drug, procedure or program works under ideal conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define Type I Error

A

Reject the null when null was true
Finding an effect that isn’t real
Convicting innocent man to prison
Considered worse than Type II

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define Type II Error

A

Failure to reject null hypothesis
Missing an effect that does exist
Not convicting guilty man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define Confounding

A

Variables that correlate in/directly with in/dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define Case Report

A

Literature identifying single incident and discussing pertinent factors related to PT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Define Case Series

A

Study analyzes number of individual cases that share a commonality, usually w/ relatively low number of subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define Case-Control

A

Studies w/ PTs already w/ condition/case compared to those who don’t have it (control)
Researcher looks back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define Systematic Review

A

Thorough, comprehensive, explicit way of interpreting medical literature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Define Meta-analysis

A

Method for combining study data from several studies to justify quantitative summary to develop single conclusion with greater statistical power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Define Prospective Cohort Study

A

IDs group of PTs already taking treatment/have exposure and follows them forward over period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Define Retrospective Cohort Study
Starts w/ cohort and goes back in time to evaluate past exposures to risk factors
26
Define Cross-sectional Study
Examines relationship between outcome and other variables of interest at one particular time Determines prevelance Cannot show casuality Does not establish temporal relationship
27
Define Quasi-experimental study
Non-randomized control study | Control group predetermined w/out random assignment and compared to control group
28
Define Case-Crossover study
Type of Case-Control study Each case becomes own individual control Used for transient exposures
29
Define Measures of Central Tendency
Mean- average, sum divided by number in set Median- middle point Mode- score occurring most frequently; least precise measure; bimodal distribution- 2 most common values
30
Define Positive Predictive Value | Define Negative Predictive Value
Pos- proportion of PTs who have disease and a pos test | Neg- PTs who do not have disease and a negative test
31
Define Likelihood Ratio
Likelihood of someone with disease/likelihood someone without disease W/WO
32
Define Odds Ratio
Measures strength of association between exposure and disease
33
Define Epidemiology
Study of distribution and determinants of health-related events in populations and application of the study to control health problems
34
Define Biostatistics
Branch of stats dealing with data relating to living organisms
35
Difference between Descriptive and Analytical Research?
Descriptive: observational patterns of disease occurrence generates hypothesis Analytical: analyzes investigates relationships tests hypothesis
36
Examples of descriptive studies?
Individual: Case reports Clinical series Population: Ecologic studies
37
Define Explanatory Studies
Attempt to provide insight into etiology/determine better PT outcome
38
What are the two types of Explanatory studies?
Experimental | Observational
39
# Define an Experimental Explanatory Study? Give examples
``` Active intervention from investigator Controlled trial Clinical trial Educational intervention Healthcare trial Intervention trial ```
40
Define an Observational Explanatory study? | Give examples
``` Investigator observes nature Case control Follow up Cross sectional Cohort ```
41
What are the layers of Quality of Evidence Pyramid?
``` Meta Analysis Systematic Review Critically Appraised literature Evidence Based Practice Randomized Control Trials Non-Random Control Trials Cohort Studies Case series/studies Individual case reports Background info/expert opinion/non-EBM guidelines ```
42
What are the two types of Analytic Descriptive studies?
Experimental: Clinical trial Community trial Education intervention Observational: Case control Cohort f/u Cross sectional
43
What are Case Series used for?
Examine adverse events/effects Catalog new diseases/outbreaks Determine feasibility/safeguards of new treatment/intervention Potential efficacy of new treatment
44
What do both Case Reports and Case Series lack?
Sufficient methodological rigor | Evidence not applicable to large populations, may be circumstantial or confounding factors were present
45
Purpose of Descriptive Study Ecologic Study
Determine relationship between exposure and disease among a population, not just individuals
46
What are the strengths of Cross Sectional Studies?
Assesses multiple outcomes/exposures simultaneously Completed quickly Data gathered leads to further studies Generates Prevalence
47
What are the limitations of Cross Sectional Studies
``` No time reference- "snapshot" Common conditions only Doesn't calculate incidence, is a prevalence study Results dependent on study population Only useful for common conditions ```
48
What type of study may follow a case series study?
Case-control study, retrospective look at causes
49
What are the strengths of Case Control studies?
``` Good for Rare Outcomes Evaluates many exposures Ideal for ideal/explanatory ides Simple/fast/efficient Inexpensive ```
50
What are the limitations of Case-control studies?
Single outcome High risk of bias/confounding variables No prevalence/incidence/relative risk
51
Define Nested Case-Control study?
A case control study | Large enrollment study within large cohorts for people at risk of disease/outcome
52
Define Case-Cohort
Same as nested case-control but with controls randomly chosen at beginning of study
53
Define Cohort
Groups of people who share common characteristic/experience and remain in a group for period of time
54
What is the strongest observational study?
Cohort Study
55
Potential biases in Case Control Studies
``` Selection bias Information bias Researcher/observer bias Voluntary response bias Matching Multiple controls ```
56
Potential biases in Cohort studies?
Selection bias- lost to f/u | Information bias- observer bias
57
What are the strengths of cohort studies?
Studies multiple effects of single exposure IDs temporal relationship between exposure and outcome Confirms cause/effect and the magnitude Measures incidence Calculates relative risk
58
What study has the highest validity of observational study design?
Cohort study
59
What are the limitations of Cohort Studies?
``` Expensive/time consuming Ineffective for rare diseases Lose participant f/u Risk of confounding variables Presence of records/recall ```
60
What is the purpose of randomization?
Prevent potential bias by investigator, strives for comparability
61
The term "controlled" in randomized control studies implies predefined 6 things
``` Hypothesis Endpoint to address hypothesis Enrollment/ f/u methods Eligibility/exclusion criteria Rigorous monitoring Analysis plan/stop rules ```
62
Why are randomized control studies controlled?
Eliminate confounding variables | Minimize bias
63
Define single, double and triple blind
Single- concealed from one group Double- concealed from both groups Triple- concealed from subjects, administers and interpreters
64
What is the Gold Standard?
Double blinded Randomized Control Trial, minimizes chance of bias Huge strength of randomized control studies
65
What are the limits of Randomized Control Studies?
``` Large trials Long term f/u Compliance Expensive Ethics ```
66
What does "Primum Non Nocere" mean?
First do no harm
67
What are the limitations of Non-randomized control studies?
Study group characteristics not balance w/ baseline confounding study's results
68
What are the 4 major areas of methodological concern in Non/randomized control studies?
Enrollment Allocation F/u Analysis
69
What parts of the EBM pyramid represent the strongest evidence?
Top 2 Systematic reviews Meta-analyses
70
What are the strengths of systematic reviews?
``` Review of current literature Less costly Less time Generalized results Reliable/accurate than individual studies Evidence-based resource ```
71
What are the limitations of Systematic reviews?
Time/labor consuming | Not easy to combine studies
72
What is the meta-analysis conclusion statistically stronger than any single study?
Increased subject numbers Diversity Accumulated effects/results
73
What are the limitations of meta-analysis?
``` Difficult/time consuming Lack of adequate data Advanced statistic techniques Hetergeneity Non-reproducible results Publication/Selection/Misclassification bias ```
74
Define Variance
Quantifies amount of variability around mean
75
Define Standard Deviation
Measure of variation of scores about the the mean
76
What is the empirical rule for data when discussing standard deviation?
68-95-99 Only applicable to bell curves 68% fall within 1 standard deviation of mean 95% fall within 2 standard deviations of mean 99.7% fall within 3 standard deviations of mean
77
Scatterplots are useful summary of sets of ______ data
Bivariate- two continuous variables | Visual relationship between two variables and helps interpret correlation coefficient or regression model
78
What type of graph/visual grouping aids w/ interpreting correlation coefficient/regression model?
Scatter plots
79
Define Pearson Correlation and what it's associated with?
Correlation coefficient Most common measure of association Misleading if relationship is non-linear
80
Define Alternative Hypothesis
AKA Research Hypothesis | Establishes expected relationship between variables being tested
81
Define Null Hypothesis
Statement of no difference/relationship between variables
82
When is the Null Hypothesis accepted/rejected?
Statistical difference is present, alternative is accepted and reject null hypothesis If no statistical difference is present, researchers retain/fail to reject null hypothesis
83
Define Significance
Probability of rejecting a true Null Hypothesis | .05= 5:100 times, Null wold be falsely rejected; 5% chance results happened by chance
84
What 3 criteria must exist to conduct a screening test?
Target disease is important cause of mortality/morbidity Proven/acceptable tests exist to detect early stage of disease Treatment is available to prevent mortality/morbidity once results are known
85
Pros/cons of Sensitivity Testing
Screening test ability to ID disease presence High sensitivity= few PTs w/ disease will be missed Rules out disease, low probability of false negative
86
Pros/Cons of Specificity
Tests ability to truly ID absence of disease Rules disease IN High specificity, low false positive
87
When are high sensitivity and high specificity tests useful to clinicians?
Sensitivity- when test is neg | Specificity- when test is pos
88
What is the use/benefit of regression analysis?
Method of predicting change in dependent variable by changing one or more independent variables
89
What are the 4 types of data?
Categorical: nominal/ordinal Continuous: interval/ratio
90
Define Nominal and Ordinal Data
Categorical data Nominal: categories w/ no order (gender, race, blood type) Ordinal: sequence/ranked (small to large, light to heavy, easy to difficult)
91
Define Interval and Ratio
Continuous data Interval: interval along scale (temperature) Ratio: presence of an absolute zero on scale is present (weight)
92
What is the benefit of using a Chi-Square test?
Most common ways to examine relationships between two or more categorical variables Does not give info on strength of relationship
93
Define Control Event Rate
How often particular event occurs w/in scientific control group
94
Define Experimental Event Rate
How often particular event occurs w/in experimental group
95
What type of cohort is cumulative incidence used in?
Fixed
96
What type of cohort is incidence rate used in?
Open
97
Define Ecological Fallacy
Bias specific to ecological studies | Occurs when relationships for groups are assumed to be true for individuals
98
Case-control studies may follow what type of study?
Case-series as retrospective look at cause
99
What study attempts to capture cause and effect relationship by comparing frequency of risk factor among the exposed/not exposed
Case control study
100
Define selection bias
inappropriate selection for case studies/controls Cases: selected from hospital/clinic/registry, single source selection may not be generalized to all PTs Control: controls from same reference population as cases
101
Define Information Bias
Recall/subject bias occuring when there is difference in recalling info of exposure
102
Define Researcher/Observer Bias
When researcher/observer evaluates cases vs controls differentially
103
Define Voluntary Response Bias
Case subject think they've been exposed respond at higher rate to control
104
Define matching
Process of selecting controls so they are similar to cases in characteristics (age, race, sex, occupation)
105
What type of investigation is a cohort study?
Epidemiologic
106
When must the criteria for determining selection be specified?
Before study has begun
107
What is the best approach in the design of a trial?
Randomization
108
What is the critical element of randomization?
Unpredictability of the next assignment
109
How/what are methods of randomization accomplished?
Computer programs | Envelope system- only opened after consent is given and subject meets eligibility criteria
110
Define stratified randomization
Used when concern about comparability of groups and one/few important characteristics Stratifies study population by each variable considered important then randomized into treatment groups
111
Define blinding | Why is it used?
Concealment of group allocation from one/more individuals involved in clinical research study Used to make sure knowing type of treatment doesn't effect participants response to treatment, healthcare providers behavior, or assessment of treatment effects
112
When is blinding usually used?
When comparing two or more types of interventions
113
Define Planned Crossover
After time on certain therapy, PT is switched to alternate therapy PT serves as own control, but must have washout period
114
Define Unplanned Crossover
Subjects are randomized cross-over to other group, randomization is broken/lost
115
What is the effect of non-compliance?
Reduce any observed differences since treatment group will include some who didn't receive therapy
116
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are both subject to bias based on what?
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
117
What is the difference between systematic review and meta-analysis?
Review- thorough comprehensive way of interpreting medical literature Analysis- statistical approach to combine data from selected studies
118
Systematic reviews _____ and ____ all empirical evidence to answer a research question
Appraise | Synthesize
119
What are the strengths of meta-analyses?
Greater statistical power Confirmatory data analysis Greater ability to extrapolate to general population
120
Define Positive correlation on scatter plot | Define negative correlation on scatter plot
Pos- X inc, Y inc | Neg- X inc, Y dec
121
Pearson's correlation is very sensetive to what?
Outlying values
122
Define Spearman Correlation
Non-parametric version of pearson's correlation | Calculation based on ranks of data points of x/y values
123
When is the alternative hypothesis accepted?
Statistically significant difference | Accept alternative, reject null
124
Define power analysis
Calculates number of participants a study must have to draw accurate calculations
125
What happens when p-value is less than/equal to .05? | What happens when p-value is greater than .05?
Reject Ho, results are statistically significant | Fail to reject Ho, results are not significant
126
What does it mean if a CI includes 1 (null value)?
Results are clinically insignificant
127
What does high sensitivity mean? | What does high specificity mean?
Low probability of false negative | Low probability of false positive
128
What happens to the Positive Predictive Value with low prevalence?
Lower PPV False positives increase Less reliable pos test results
129
What happens to Negative Predictive Value with low prevalence?
Higher NPV False neg test decreased Neg test is more reliable
130
What calculation can be done to determine the probability of a disease in a low prevalence setting?
Likelihood ratio
131
Define positive and negative likelihood ratio
Pos- Pos test (sensitivity) / non-diseased (specificity) Rules disease in 1-infinity, desirable is 5 or more Neg- diseased people with neg test (sensitivity)/non-diseased people with neg test (specificity) Ruling out disease 0.0-1.0 Smaller the better, desirable is 0.2 or less
132
How is relative risk calculated?
Cumulative incidence data to measure probability of developing disease Experimental Event Rate / Control Event Rate EER/CER
133
Define T-test
AKA student's t-test Used to analyze continuous data by comparing means and standard deviations of two populations, computes a p-value to test null-hypothesis
134
What are examples of T-tests?
Histogram | Statistical tests
135
Define reliability
Degree to which measurements are reproducible
136
Define Independent Variable
Condition/intervention that predicts an outcome Age/gender/marital status Experimental treatment doesn't change the value
137
Define Dependent Variable
AKA Outcome variable | Result that is presumed depending on independent variable
138
Definition of Evidence Based Medicine
Systematic approach to clinical problem solving allowing integration of best variable research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values
139
What are the 3 fundamental principles of EBM
Optimal clinical decision making requirements Deciding if evidence is more/less trustworthy Evidence alone is never sufficient enough to make decisions
140
What is the simplified process of EBM?
``` Assess Ask Acquire Appraise Apply ```
141
What are the 5 types of clinical questions?
``` Therapy Harm Differential Diagnosis Prognosis ```
142
Define Quantitative Research
Research w/ formal, objective info about the world with math quantification Used to describe test relationships and examine cause/effect relationships
143
Define Qualitative Research
Research with phenomena that are difficult/impossible to mathematically quantify
144
What study design does not have a comparison group?
Case Series Study
145
What analytical design is simultaneous evaluation of exposure and outcome?
Cross Sectional Study
146
What type of study design can explore potential relationships between exposure and disease between two communities?
Ecological
147
What observational study design provides best casual estimate of relationship between exposure and outcome?
Prospective Cohort Study
148
What observational study allows designer to explore prevalence in a population?
Cross Sectional
149
What study design are control and cases selected/identified within framework of a cohort study?
Nested Case-Control
150
Which study design can calculate relative-risk?
Prospective cohort
151
Which study design can calculate incidence?
Prospective cohort
152
Which study design can not calculate odds ratio?
Case Report
153
Which study design is the participant's disease/outcome free at the beginning of the study period?
Prospective Cohort
154
In general a p | value > 0.05 represents which of the following?
A statistically insignificant result
155
Which of the following p | values rejects the null hypothesis if the α value is set to 0.05?
P = 0.01
156
Which of the follow statement best defines a type II error?
A type II error occurs if we fail to reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is false
157
Which of the following terms describes the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis?
Power
158
Which of the following correlation coefficients represents the strongest positive correlation between two variables?
0.99
159
Which of the following best describes a p value ≤0.05?
Means there is a 5% chance that the results occurred by chance alone
160
Which of the following statements best describes an alternative hypothesis?
The alternative hypothesis represents the expected relationship between the independent and dependent variable
161
Which of the following represents the most common measure of variability in research?
Standard Deviation
162
Which of the following is a measure of central tendency?
mean
163
Which of the following is the least precise measure of central tendency?
Mode
164
What type of error is made when we reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true?
Type I error (α error)
165
Which characteristic of a diagnostic test is most helpful in ruling-in a disease if the result of the test is positive?
Specificity
166
Which of the following test characteristics defines a tests ability to correctly identify the presence of disease?
Sensitivity
167
Which of the following is the most valuable in determining the statistical significance of an effect estimate?
Confidence interval
168
In which of the following study designs can incidence be calculated?
Cohort study
169
Which of the following is an example of a categorical variable?
Gender
170
Which of the following is an example of a continuous variable?
BP
171
The term that describes the probability of patients who test positive and truly have the disease is:
Positive Predictive Value
172
Sequential (two-stage) testing results in which of the following?
Loss in net sensitivity and net gain in specificity
173
Simultaneous testing results in which of the following?
Net gain in sensitivity and net loss in specificity
174
Which of the following terms best describes the current disease burden in a community and population?
Prevalence
175
Assuming a disease has no cure and low risk of subsequent death. What is the likely effect on prevalence if an aggressive screening program is initiated?
Prevalence is likely to increase
176
A prospective cohort study exploring the relationship between coffee consumption and Gastric Cancer in a large urban city found that the risk of gastric cancer was higher among coffee drinkers; however, the researchers did not adjust for potentially confounding variables. Is the inference that coffee drinkers are at greater risk of developing Gastric Cancer likely to be correct or incorrect?
Incorrect as there may be other relevant factors that may explain this relationship
177
Which of the following represents the highest level of evidence based research?
Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
178
Which observational study design provides highest level of validity?
Prospective Cohort Study
179
Which of following is the best method of determining if randomization was successful when conducting a randomized controlled trial?
Confirm that researchers did not alter the allocation participants into treatment or control groups
180
You work in a family practice clinic and order a rapid strep test for a patient with a sore throat. The rapid strep test has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98%. What does a positive test likely represent?
The patient likely has an infection
181
The current rapid strep test has a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98%; however, a new generation test has a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 98%. What is the likely result utilizing the new test?
The new test will identify more people with an infection
182
The results of study reports a relative risk (RR) of 2.50 (95% CI: 1.50-3.50). Which of the following is best interpretation of the RR and 95% CI?
The reported RR is statistically significant
183
Which of the following is most appropriate definition of a confounder?
A variable related the factor and outcome, but not in the causal pathway
184
What is the relation between a Positive Predictive Value and prevalence? What is the relation between a Negative Predictive Value and prevalence?
PPV- directly related to prevalence | NPV- Inversely related to prevalence

IPAP (212 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions