Diet And Cancer Flashcards

1
Q

Which risk factors are linked to bowel cancer?

A

Obesity
Processed meats such as sausages and salami
High red meat consumption
Tobacco
Inactivity
High salt and alcohol consumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Bradford Hill criteria?

A

Used to establish the relationship between cause and effect for a hypothesis based on:
Strength of association
Temporality
Dose response
Modifiable
Plausible
Specificity
Coherence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the strength and association factor?

A

A greater odds ratio/relative risk indicates a greater causality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the temporality factor?

A

The cause/risk should come before the effect/outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the dose-response factor?

A

Outcome should be dependent on the level of the exposure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the specificity factor?

A

A cause will have only one effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a confounding variable?

A

A cause and an effect are linked by a third factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is reverse causality?

A

When the expected result is reversed and the effect leads to the cause, therefore it is important to establish temporality in a study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a case control study?

A

Retrospective study based on outcome like disease where a group with the disease and a group without are compared for exposure to risk factor. It is measured using odds ratio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is a case control managed to increase validity?

A

Patients are matched for age and sex to prevent confounding.

Case control is good because it is fast and cheap and good for rare diseases. However, it is subject to recall bias, and difficult to measure the risk and the impact of risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is cohort study?

A

Groups are selected based on their exposure to risk factors and they are observed to see if they develop the outcome, which can be retrospective or prospective and measured using relative risk. Patients are excluded if they have the outcome. It is useful for assessing a range of risks, however it is expensive and difficult to measure risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meta-analysis?

A

The statistical combination of the results from similar studies addressing a specific question into one pooled result in the form of a forest plot. It is the gold standard bias for the evidence hierarchy.

The studies should not have too much heterogenity, such as many differences like intervention or population which limits the comparison that can be made. However, it is subject to publication bias and needs periodical revision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a systematic review?

A

Synthesis of the findings from multiple sources into one research paper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the considerations for RCT trials?

A

Identify causal relationships and reduce confounding bias by controlling participant factors to measure effect of intervention. However, it is expensive and prone to generalisable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the evidence hierarchy?

A

Meta-analyses is the gold standard, followed by systematic review.

RCTs are the best trial > Cohort > Case control > Case-series

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a source for meta-analyses?

A

Cochrane library, which provides an overall statistic as a forest plot so clinical decisions can be made.

17
Q

What is the evidence for reduction in colorectal cancer risk?

A

Eating 5-a-day shows a dose-response relationship for reduction in cancer risk, however, there is a limit before plateau occurs and has a small overall effect of 13% reduction.

Confounding factors in the study may be access to healthcare, lifestyle choice like smoking and alcohol and education about cancer symptoms.