Critical Appraisal Flashcards
What is the framework for question searching?
PICO:
Population
Intervention
Control
Outcome
What is the best study design for diagnosis?
Cross-sectional study, which takes data from a singular point in time such as a survey and analysing the results.
What is the best study design for aetiology?
Case control study that is population based
Cohort study
What is the best study design for quality evaluation?
Descriptive studies like surveys or qualitative research
What is the best study design for prognosis?
Cohort studies
What is the best study design for treatments?
RCTs or Systematic Review of RCTs
How is a systematic review beneficial?
Results from all available evidence from unpublished research and those not in the English Language
Sensitivity analyses can be performed
Sub-group analyses can be carried out
Can indicate heterogeneity between studies
Increases the total sample size that will increase certainty and precision
What is bias?
Systematic introduction of error in a study that distorts the results.
What are important calculations for research designs towards treatments?
Treatment research designs are RCTs.
Relative risk, absolute risk, odds ratio, confidence interval and number needed to treat.
What are important calculations for research designs towards diagnosis?
Research study designs are cross sectional studies.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio.
What are important calculations for research designs towards prognosis?
Prognosis research study design is cohort studies or case-control.
Relative risk or odds ratio.
What are important calculations for research designs towards aetiology?
Research study designs are
Relative risk reduction, odds ratio and and number needed to harm.
What are important considerations for using the results of a research study for decision making?
Generalisability of the results to the patient population that you are treating
Availability of the desired outcome from the study that is provided by the local health service.
How should you critically appraise a study?
->Clearly focused question based on population, intervention given and outcomes considered
->Research design chosen is appropriate
-> How they attempted to identify all relevant studies, including the database used and unpublished non-English studies
->How the quality of te study was assessed based on a scoring system or pre-determined strategy
->If a confidence interval or p value was reported
->How the results are presented e.g odds ratio and the significance/size of the result
-> Generalisability
-> Consideration of outcomes from different perspectives
-> Benefit from change
How should studies which have combined the results of multiple trials be appraised?
Whether there were tests for heterogeneity
Variations in the results were discussed
Results of each study are displayed
-> Ideally, combined results should use similar outcomes