3.4: Cultural variations in attachment Flashcards
Cultural variations
Cultural variations are differences in:
1. Child-rearing practices
2. Attachment types
between different cultural groups
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then what?
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments:
1. Evolved
2. Have a survival value
is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of what?
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments:
1. Evolved
2. Have a survival value
is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
What should dominate in all cultures?
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of what?
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of:
1. Insecure-avoidant
2. Insecure-resistant
types
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Who (what year) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures?
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures.
What does he argue?
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with:
- Weak adult relationships
- Early sexual activity
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures.
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like when?
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like after a: 1. Famine Or, 2. Plague when many people have died
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures.
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like after a famine or plague when many people have died, why?
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like after a famine or plague when many people have died, because people would need to reproduce by:
- Being sexually active at a young age
- Not getting too emotionally involved with people who might die young
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures.
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like after a famine or plague when many people have died, because people would need to reproduce by being sexually active at a young age and not getting too emotionally involved with people who might die young.
However, if different patterns of attachment types are found cross-culturally, what would it mean?
If different patterns of attachment types are found cross-culturally, it would mean that infants’ attachment types are not biological
If Bowlby’s belief that attachments evolved and have a survival value is true, then patterns of attachment types should be similar across different cultures, regardless of child-rearing practices used within those cultures.
Secure attachments should dominate in all cultures, with equal amounts of insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant types.
Belsky (1999) even proposes an evolutionary reason for the existence of similar attachment types in different cultures.
He argues that insecure attachment types are associated with weak adult relationships and early sexual activity, which could be useful in certain situations, like after a famine or plague when many people have died, because people would need to reproduce by being sexually active at a young age and not getting too emotionally involved with people who might die young.
However, if different patterns of attachment types are found cross-culturally, it would mean that infants’ attachment types are not biological, but what?
If different patterns of attachment types are found cross-culturally, it would mean that infants’ attachment types are:
1. Not biological
,but
2. Learned through exposure to different cross-cultural child-rearing styles
Child-rearing styles do vary across different cultures.
For example, in some cultures one person does most of the caregiving, while in other cultures, many carers are involved.
There are also cross-cultural differences as to how different attachment types are regarded.
Example
For example:
1. In Britain, we view insecure-avoidant attachment negatively, because it is associated with weak attachments to people
,but
2. In Germany, insecure-avoidant attachments are valued, because they are associated with being independent from others, which is viewed positively in German culture
Child-rearing styles do vary across different cultures.
For example, in some cultures one person does most of the caregiving, while in other cultures, many carers are involved.
There are also cross-cultural differences as to how different attachment types are regarded.
For example, in Britain, we view insecure-avoidant attachment negatively, because it is associated with weak attachments to people, but in Germany, insecure-avoidant attachments are valued, because they are associated with being independent from others, which is viewed positively in German culture.
In Germany, what are many more infants classed as being?
In Germany, many more infants are classed as being insecure-avoidant
Kyoung (2005) used the Strange Situation to compare 87 Korean families with 113 American families.
There were notable differences: The Korean infants did not stay close to their mothers and when Korean mothers returned, they were more likely to play with their infants.
There were, however, a similar proportion of securely attached children in both cultures, suggesting that different child-rearing practices can lead to secure attachments.
k
Grossmann and Grossmann (1991) found that German infants tended to be classified as insecurely attached.
This may be due to different child-rearing practices, because German culture requires ‘distance’ between parents and children.
This indicates that there are cross-cultural variations in attachment
k