Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

A Level AQA Psychology COPY > 1.2: Normative social influence (NSI) > Flashcards

1.2: Normative social influence (NSI) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

Normative social influence (NSI) is overall because it’s the what?

A

Normative social influence (NSI) is overall because it’s the norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Individuals want others to do what and not do what?

A

Individuals want others to:

  1. Like and respect them
  2. Not reject or ridicule them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Individuals want others to like and respect them and not reject or ridicule them.
This is the what underpinning normative social influence (NSI)?

A

This is the motivation underpinning normative social influence (NSI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Individuals want others to like and respect them and not reject or ridicule them.
This is the motivation underpinning normative social influence (NSI) - the need to be what?

A

This is the motivation underpinning normative social influence (NSI) - the need to be accepted by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Individuals want others to like and respect them and not reject or ridicule them.
This is the motivation underpinning normative social influence (NSI) - the need to be accepted by others.
The best way of gaining the acceptance of others is to do what?

A

The best way of gaining the acceptance of others is to:

  1. Agree with them
  2. Follow social norms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Individuals want others to like and respect them and not reject or ridicule them.
This is the motivation underpinning normative social influence (NSI) - the need to be accepted by others.
The best way of gaining the acceptance of others is to agree with them and follow social norms.
However, this does not necessarily mean what?

A

This does not necessarily mean that we truly agree with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Normative social influence (NSI) is concerned with what?

A

Normative social influence (NSI) is concerned with emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Social norms

A

Social norms are things society deem acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Normative social influence (NSI) usually occurs when you seek what?

A

Normative social influence (NSI) usually occurs when you seek the approval of strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Normative social influence (NSI) usually occurs when you seek the approval of strangers.
Examples

A

For example:
1. In an interview
Or,
2. Your first day at a new job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Normative social influence (NSI)

A

Normative social influence (NSI) is a motivational force to be:
1. Liked
2. Accepted
by a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Normative social influence (NSI) could be compliance, the shallowest form of conformity, because you don’t want to be what?

A

Normative social influence (NSI) could be compliance, the shallowest form of conformity, because you don’t want to be socially awkward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked what?

A

If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority.
A conflict has been created between what?

A

A conflict has been created between:

  1. An individual’s opinion
  2. That of the group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority.
A conflict has been created between an individual’s opinion and that of the group.
In the what, many said ‘I didn’t want to look stupid’ or ‘I didn’t want to be the odd one out?’

A

In the post-experimental debriefing, many said ‘I didn’t want to:
1. ‘Look stupid’
Or,
2. ‘Be the odd one out’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority.
A conflict has been created between an individual’s opinion and that of the group.
In the post-experimental debriefing, many said ‘I didn’t want to look stupid’ or ‘I didn’t want to be the odd one out.’
So they compromised, with what they said (publicly) and believed (privately) being what?

A

So they compromised, with what they:
1. Said (publicly)
2. Believed (privately)
being completely different

17
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority.
A conflict has been created between an individual’s opinion and that of the group.
In the post-experimental debriefing, many said ‘I didn’t want to look stupid’ or ‘I didn’t want to be the odd one out.’
So they compromised, with what they said (publicly) and believed (privately) being completely different, demonstrating an example of what?

A

So they compromised, with what they:
1. Said (publicly)
2. Believed (privately)
being completely different, demonstrating an example of compliance

18
Q

Asch (1955) got participants to conform to answers given by others that were obviously incorrect.
If the participants gave the correct answers, they risked being ridiculed by the majority.
A conflict has been created between an individual’s opinion and that of the group.
In the post-experimental debriefing, many said ‘I didn’t want to look stupid’ or ‘I didn’t want to be the odd one out.’
So they compromised, with what they said (publicly) and believed (privately) being completely different, demonstrating an example of compliance.
Jenness’ participants did not face this conflict, because in his study there was no what?

A

Jenness’ participants did not face this conflict, because in his study there was no obviously correct answer

19
Q

Who (what year) developed a what theory?

A

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory

20
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing what?

A

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform

21
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 what?

A

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be:

  1. Right (ISI)
  2. Liked (NSI)
22
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is what?

A

The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to:
1. ISI
Or,
2. NSI

23
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, what processes are involved?

A

But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved

24
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
Example

A

For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment

25
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may do what?

A

This dissenter may reduce the power of:
1. ISI
Or,
2. NSI

26
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is what) or reduce the power of NSI?

A

This dissenter may reduce the power of:
1. ISI (because there is an alternative source of information)
Or,
2. NSI

27
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is an alternative source of information) or reduce the power of NSI (because the dissenter does what)?

A

This dissenter may reduce the power of:
1. ISI (because there is an alternative source of information)
Or,
2. NSI (because the dissenter provides social support)

28
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is an alternative source of information) or reduce the power of NSI (because the dissenter provides social support).
What does this show?

A 
This shows that it isn't always possible to be sure whether:
1. ISI
Or,
2. NSI
is at work
29
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is an alternative source of information) or reduce the power of NSI (because the dissenter provides social support).
This shows that it isn’t always possible to be sure whether ISI or NSI is at work.
This is the case where?

A

This is the case in laboratory studies

30
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is an alternative source of information) or reduce the power of NSI (because the dissenter provides social support).
This shows that it isn’t always possible to be sure whether ISI or NSI is at work.
This is the case in laboratory studies, but it is even truer where?

A

This is the case in laboratory studies, but it is even truer in real life conformity situations outside the laboratory

31
Q

Deutsch and Gerard (1955) developed a two-process theory, arguing that there are 2 main reasons people conform, based on 2 central human needs, the need to be right (ISI) and the need to be liked (NSI).
The idea of Deutsch and Gerard’s ‘two-process’ approach is that behaviour is either due to ISI or NSI.
But the truth is that, more often, both processes are involved.
For example, conformity is reduced when there is one other dissenting participant in the Asch experiment.
This dissenter may reduce the power of ISI (because there is an alternative source of information) or reduce the power of NSI (because the dissenter provides social support).
This shows that it isn’t always possible to be sure whether ISI or NSI is at work.
This is the case in laboratory studies, but it is even truer in real life conformity situations outside the laboratory.
This casts serious doubt over what?

A

This casts serious doubt over the view of:
1. ISI
2. NSI
as 2 processes operating independently in conforming behaviour

A Level AQA Psychology COPY (145 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions