1.8: Other factors involved in the resistance of obedience Flashcards
Systematic processing
Systematic processing is analysis based upon critical thinking
Systematic processing:
Individuals are less likely to obey orders that have negative outcomes if they are given time to consider what?
Individuals are less likely to obey orders that have negative outcomes if they are given time to consider the consequences of what they have been ordered to do
Systematic processing:
Individuals are less likely to obey orders that have negative outcomes if they are given time to consider the consequences of what they have been ordered to do.
However, the expectation in many what, such as the armed forces, is that orders should be what?
The expectation in many institutional settings, such as the armed forces, is that orders should be complied with immediately without thought
Systematic processing:
Individuals are less likely to obey orders that have negative outcomes if they are given time to consider the consequences of what they have been ordered to do.
However, the expectation in many institutional settings, such as the armed forces, is that orders should be complied with immediately without thought.
Much basic training in the armed forces is concerned with achieving such a what?
Much basic training in the armed forces is concerned with achieving such a mindset
Systematic processing:
Individuals are less likely to obey orders that have negative outcomes if they are given time to consider the consequences of what they have been ordered to do.
However, the expectation in many institutional settings, such as the armed forces, is that orders should be complied with immediately without thought.
Much basic training in the armed forces is concerned with achieving such a mindset, because what situations would generally require what?
Much basic training in the armed forces is concerned with achieving such a mindset, because conflict situations would generally require immediate obedience
Systematic processing:
Who (what year) found that when participants were what, they were less likely to obey?
Martin et al. (2007) found that when participants were:
1. Encouraged
2. Allowed
to consider the content of an unreasonable order, they were less likely to obey
Systematic processing:
Martin et al. (2007) found that when participants were encouraged and allowed to consider the content of an unreasonable order, they were less likely to obey, demonstrating the power of what in resisting social influence?
Martin et al. (2007) found that when participants were:
1. Encouraged
2. Allowed
to consider the content of an unreasonable order, they were less likely to obey, demonstrating the power of systematic processing in resisting social influence
Systematic processing:
Who (what year) reported that disobedience increases when people are encouraged to question the what of the authority figure issuing an order?
Taylor et al. (1997) reported that disobedience increases when people are encouraged to question the motives of the authority figure issuing an order
Systematic processing:
Taylor et al. (1997) reported that disobedience increases when people are encouraged to question the motives of the authority figure issuing an order.
This suggests that systematic processing helps resist obedience by doing what?
This suggests that systematic processing helps resist obedience by lessening the legitimacy of authority figures
Morality
Morality is:
1. Decisions
2. Behaviour
based upon the perception of proper conduct
Morality:
Research has shown that individuals who make decisions on whether to obey or not based on what are more resistant to obedience than those who do not?
Research has shown that individuals who make decisions on whether to:
1. Obey
Or,
2. Not
based on moral considerations are more resistant to obedience than those who do not
Morality:
Who (what year) reported that one participant who did not fully obey stated in a what that he was a what?
Milgram (1974) reported that one participant who did not fully obey stated in a post-study interview that he was a vicar
Morality:
Milgram (1974) reported that one participant who did not fully obey stated in a post-study interview that he was a vicar and his disobedience had been based on him doing what?
Milgram (1974) reported that one participant who did not fully obey stated in a post-study interview that:
- He was a vicar
- His disobedience had been based on him ‘obeying a higher authority’ (God)
Morality:
Milgram (1974) reported that one participant who did not fully obey stated in a post-study interview that he was a vicar and his disobedience had been based on him ‘obeying a higher authority’ (God).
In other ways, his what had helped him resist what?
In other ways, the participant’s religious morality had helped him resist the authority figure’s commands to deliver the electric shocks
Moral dilemma
A moral dilemma is a choice between 2 alternatives involving a moral decision