1.5: Jerry Burger (2009) Flashcards
What is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken?
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken, but would what be found today?
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken, but would similar results be found today?
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken, but would similar results be found today?
Milgram’s study would also be what under present-day guidelines?
Milgram’s study would also be unethical under present-day guidelines
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken, but would similar results be found today?
Milgram’s study would also be unethical under present-day guidelines.
However, Burger developed a version of Milgram’s procedure that did what?
Burger developed a version of Milgram’s procedure that addressed ethical concerns
Milgram’s study is one of the most famous psychology experiments ever undertaken, but would similar results be found today?
Milgram’s study would also be unethical under present-day guidelines.
However, Burger developed a version of Milgram’s procedure that addressed ethical concerns, so that what could be made between what?
Burger developed a version of Milgram’s procedure that addressed ethical concerns, so that a comparison could be made between obedience rates in:
- The 1960s
- Now
The aim of Burger’s study was to do what?
The aim of Burger’s study was to develop a variation of Milgram’s procedures, allowing comparison with the original investigation
The aim of Burger’s study was to develop a variation of Milgram’s procedures, allowing comparison with the original investigation, while doing what?
The aim of Burger’s study was to develop a variation of Milgram’s procedures, allowing comparison with the original investigation, while protecting the well-being of participants
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that what was followed?
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including what?
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the:
- Words used in the memory test
- Experimenter’s lab coat
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, what were made?
Important changes were made
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with what was used?
Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was what?
Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which what?
Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to do what?
Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A what for participants was used to exclude who?
A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with what was acceptable?
Noone with a history of: 1. Mental problems Or, 2. Stress reactions was accepted
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded who?
This excluded 38% of potential participants
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told how many times they could withdraw at any time?
Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a what real shock?
Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the what applied in Milgram’s study?
Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the 45 volts applied in Milgram’s study
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the 45 volts applied in Milgram’s study.
4. The experimenter was a what?
The experimenter was a clinical psychologist
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the 45 volts applied in Milgram’s study.
4. The experimenter was a clinical psychologist, who could do what?
The experimenter was a clinical psychologist, who could stop the procedure at any sign of excessive stress
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the 45 volts applied in Milgram’s study.
4. The experimenter was a clinical psychologist, who could stop the procedure at any sign of excessive stress.
5. Who were used?
70:
1. Male
2. Female
participants were used
The method and procedure of Burger’s study was that most of Milgram’s procedure was followed, including the words used in the memory test and the experimenter’s lab coat.
However, important changes were made.
1. Noone with knowledge of Milgram’s study was used and the maximum apparent shock was 150 volts, the level at which the learner first cries in pain, in order to protect participants from intense stress.
2. A 2-step screening process for participants was used to exclude any participants who might react negatively.
Noone with a history of mental problems or stress reactions was accepted.
This excluded 38% of potential participants.
3. Participants were told 3 times they could withdraw at any time and received only a 15 volt real shock, as opposed to the 45 volts applied in Milgram’s study.
4. The experimenter was a clinical psychologist, who could stop the procedure at any sign of excessive stress.
5. 70 male and female participants were used.
Who approved the procedure?
The relevant ethical monitoring body approved the procedure
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of what?
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of 70%
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of 70%, with no difference between what?
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of 70%, with no difference between:
1. Male
2. Female
obedience rates
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of 70%, with no difference between male and female obedience rates.
Another condition, where what, failed to do what?
Another condition, where a second defiant confederate teacher was introduced, failed to reduce obedience significantly
The findings of Burger’s study are that Burger found an obedience rate of 70%, with no difference between male and female obedience rates.
Another condition, where a second defiant confederate teacher was introduced, failed to reduce obedience significantly, unlike what?
Another condition, where a second defiant confederate teacher was introduced, failed to reduce obedience significantly, unlike Milgram’s findings
The conclusions of Burger’s study are that what?
The conclusions of Burger’s study are that it is possible to replicate Milgram’s study in a fashion non-harmful to participants
The conclusions of Burger’s study are that it is possible to replicate Milgram’s study in a fashion non-harmful to participants.
Obedience rates have what in the 50-odd years since Milgram’s study?
Obedience rates have not changed dramatically in the 50-odd years since Milgram’s study
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits what?
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits obedience research to be conducted that has not been possible for decades
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits obedience research to be conducted that has not been possible for decades.
Burger’s efforts to do what are uncertain in their what?
Burger’s efforts to improve the ethics of the study are uncertain in their effectiveness
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits obedience research to be conducted that has not been possible for decades.
Burger’s efforts to improve the ethics of the study are uncertain in their effectiveness and pose what?
Burger’s efforts to improve the ethics of the study:
- Are uncertain in their effectiveness
- Pose impractical demands
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits obedience research to be conducted that has not been possible for decades.
Burger’s efforts to improve the ethics of the study are uncertain in their effectiveness and pose impractical demands.
The different procedures used by Milgram and Burger do not allow a what?
The different procedures used by:
1. Milgram
2. Burger
do not allow a clear comparison of results
The evaluation of Burger’s study is that Burger’s technique permits obedience research to be conducted that has not been possible for decades.
Burger’s efforts to improve the ethics of the study are uncertain in their effectiveness and pose impractical demands.
The different procedures used by Milgram and Burger do not allow a clear comparison of results.
Burger’s study highlights the difficulties of doing what?
Burger’s study highlights the difficulties of extending research on destructive obedience in the context of contemporary ethical guidelines
When did Burger’s Milgram comparison study take place?
Burger’s Milgram comparison study took place in 2009
