The Behavioural Approach to Treating Phobias Flashcards
Systematic Desensitisation
- Behaviour therapy
- Gradually reduce phobic anxiety via classical conditioning
- Counterconditioning -> making a new association:
- Initial CS (spider) -> CR (fear)
- New Association: Initial CS (spider) -> CR (relaxation)
Three Processes involved in Systematic Desensitisation
- Anxiety Hierarchy
- Relaxation
- Exposure
- Anxiety Hierarchy
- Developed by client and therapist
- List of situations that provoke anxiety from least to most frightening
- Relaxation
- Therapist teaches client reciprocal inhibition (so relaxed you cannot be afraid).
- Ex. Breathing techniques, meditation, or Valium (prescription medication).
- Exposure
- Client exposed to phobic stimulus in relaxed state over several sessions.
- Success = relaxed in situations at top of anxiety hierarchy.
Flooding
- Exposure to the phobic stimulus without gradual build-up in anxiety hierarchy.
- Immediate exposure very frightening situation.
- One session lasts 2-3 hours.
How does Flooding Work?
- Flooding stops phobic responses quickly.
- Extinction (classical conditioning).
- Relaxation may be achieved because exhausted by own fear response.
Flooding Ethical Safeguards
- Not unethical, but unpleasant so informed consent essential.
- Client given choice of systematic desensitisation or flooding.
Evaluation: Evidence for Effectiveness for SD
- Strength: evidence base of effectiveness.
- Gilroy et al. (2003): 42 people SD for arachnophobia in 3 45-min sessions.
- Control: relaxation but no exposure.
- Result: at 2 and 33 months, SD group less fearful than control group.
- Wechsler et al. (2019): SD effective for agoraphobia, social phobia, and specific phobia. Review study (meta-analysis).
Evaluation of SD: People with Learning Disabilities
Strength: people with learning disabilities struggle with cognitive therapies (too complex) and flooding (too distressing, fully informed consent?).
Evaluation Extra: SD in Virtual Reality
- Avoid dangerous situations (e.g., heights) and cost-effective because psychologist and client do not leave the consulting room.
Flooding Evaluation
Cost – effective
- Strength: highly cost-effective.
- Clinical effectiveness and cost effective = how effective therapy is at tackling symptoms and cost.
- Flooding can work in one 3-hour session.
- More people treated at same cost than with SD or other therapies.
Traumatic
- Limitation: highly unpleasant experience.
- Schumacher et al. (2015): flooding more stressful for clients and therapists than SD.
- Ethical issues knowingly cause distress (even with informed consent).
- Attrition (drop out) rates higher with flooding.
Symptom Substitution
- Limitation to behaviour therapies: mask symptoms but don’t tackle underlying causes (symptom substitution).
- Pearson’s (1986) woman with phobia of death treated using flooding. Fear of death declined but fear of criticism got worse.
- Only evidence for symptom substitution from case studies and may only apply to that phobia.
Cost – effective
- Strength: highly cost-effective.
- Clinical effectiveness and cost effective = how effective therapy is at tackling symptoms and cost.
- Flooding can work in one 3-hour session.
- More people treated at same cost than with SD or other therapies.
Traumatic
- Limitation: highly unpleasant experience.
- Schumacher et al. (2015): flooding more stressful for clients and therapists than SD.
- Ethical issues knowingly cause distress (even with informed consent).
- Attrition (drop out) rates higher with flooding.
Symptom Substitution
- Limitation to behaviour therapies: mask symptoms but don’t tackle underlying causes (symptom substitution).
- Pearson’s (1986) woman with phobia of death treated using flooding. Fear of death declined but fear of criticism got worse.
- Only evidence for symptom substitution from case studies and may only apply to that phobia.