social influences dates of studies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

When was aschs study what year?

A

1951

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who argued that the Stanford prison experiment lacked realism?

A

Banuazizi and Mohavedi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Low validity milligram who was it and what was said?

A

Low Validity - Orne & Holland. Participants could guess the study. Demand characteristics.


How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

High external validity milligrams who and what was said?

A

High External validity - Hofling et al. Nurses administering drugs after being told by doctors. Milgram’s findings apply to other situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Smith and bond what was it which study?

A

Smith and Bond said that these variations were only applied across western developed societies so it cannot be said these results apply universally, they just aren’t limited to the USA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Blass and schmidt what year what was it about?

A

Blass & Schmidt (2001) showed a clip of Milgram’s study to ppts. Ppts stated that the harm done to the learner was the experimenter’s fault and the responsibility was due to the legitimacy of authority - the experimenter is at the top of the hierarchy and also an expert. Legitimacy of authority is given as a reason for obedience, supporting this explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Kilnab abd mann what was it?

A

Kilham & Mann found in Australia only 16% went to 450v, whereas in Germany Mantell found an 86% obedience.

This shows how in some cultures authority is more likely to seen as legitimate and accepted. This reflects the different ways in which societies are structured and how children are raised to accept authority - supportive cross cultural findings increase ecological validity of the explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Adorno et al what year was it and what was it?

A

Adorno et al. (1950) - causes of the obedient personality. 2000 middle class white Americans -studied unconscious attitudes towards other racial groups. Used the F-Scale to measure the authoritarian personality. High scorers on the F-scale identified with strong people and were contemptuous of the weak, conscious of their own status, showing excessive respect to those of a higher status. Very black and white with high levels of prejudice and stereotypes beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When was gamson et all and what was it about?

A

Evidence for the role of dissenters in resisting obedience (Gamson et al. 1982). PPTs were in groups - found higher levels of resistance than Milgram - 88% rebelled. Shows there is a link between peer support and resistance.


How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Allen and Levine what was it?

A

Conformity decreased when a dissenter was present in an Asch-type study. Even when the dissenter wore thick glasses and claimed to have bad vision. Shows that it is not the presence of another answer that causes resistance, but the dissenter allows us to be free of pressure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When was Holland on LOC

A

Holland 1967

Reaped the milligram study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When was Rotter LOC?

A

1982
Suggested the LoC only comes into play in novel situations. In familiar situations past experiences may be more important. This means that people who have conformed or obey in specific situations are likely to do so again. It suggests that locus of control can explain only a limited range of situations - maybe not as important as first thought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly