research methods Flashcards
Questionnaires:
Pre set list of questions to record thoughts and feelings
Most common type of self report technique
Self report tchnique:
any method in which a person us asked to state or explain their own feelings, opinions behaviours and /or experience related to a given topic
Open questions:
no fixed range of answers and participants are free to answer in any way they wish
Open ended questions tend to produce
what type of data
qualitative data
Closed questions
fixed number of responses or scale of 1-10
Closed response what type of data
tend to provide more quantitive data
Interviews
A live encounter where one person asks a set of questions to asses an interviewees thoughts and or experiences
Interviews; structured
Pre seteremied set of questions that are asked in a fixed order
It may be like a questionnaire but conducted face to face in real time the interviewer asks the questions and waits for a response
Inyterviews; instructed
No set questions
There is a general aim that a certain topic will be discussed and interaction tends to be free flowing
The interviewee is encouraged to expand and elaborate their answers as prompted by the interviewer
Interviews; semi structured
There is a list of questions that have been worked out in advance but interviews are also free to ask follow up questions based on previous answers
Emulations strengths of questionnaires
cost effective Questionnaires;
can be completed with or without researcher present
Data produced is usually straightforward to analyse so easy to conduct stats analysis and compare groups of people
Evolutions and limitations of questionnaires;
The response may not always be truthful
Respondents are keen to represents trhemsevleves Una positive light. This is a form of demand character called social desirability bias
Questionnaires often produce response bias which is where respondents tend to reply in a similar way or answering at same favoured end of a rating scale
Why respondents may complete assemnet too quickly and fail to read question properly
Acquiescence bias; response bias
Evaluation; strutted interviews
Benefits; straightforward to replicate thanks to standardised format. This also reduces differences between interviewers
Limitations; not possible for interviewers to deviate from the topic or explain their questions and this will limit richness of data collected and limit unexpected information
Evaluation; unstructed interviews
Benefits: flexibility, interviews can follow up points as they arise and is much more likely to gain insight into the worldview of interviewee and gets unexpected information
Limitation: increased risk of interviewer bias. Analysis from instructed interview is not straightforward
There is a risk that interviewee may lie due to social desirability
Likert Scales:
Respondent indicates their agreements or not with a statement using a scale
Scale ranges from strongly agree to strongly disagree
Rating scale
Rating scale works similar to a likert scale but gets respondents to identify a value gtghat represents their strength of felling a bout a particular topic
Fixed choice option
A list of possible options and respondents are required to indicate those that apply to them
(tick all those that apply)
dont want a yes no good alternative
Designing interviews
Interview schedule: list of questions that the interviewer intends to cover. This should be standardised to reduce contaminating effect of interview bias
intervoews can be with a single participants or through group interviews
What makes for a good interview?
Quiet setting away from other people
Start the interview with neutral questions to make interviwee feel relaxed and comfortable and stabilise a rapport
Remind interviewees throughout interview that answers are confidential
Questionaires designed
Aim and hypothesis Decide items for your questionnaires Pilot the questionnaires Sampling Consider ethical issues Analysis of data
Correlation
llustrates the strength and direction of an accusation between two or more co-variable
Zero correlation:
when there is no relationship between the co variables
Evualtion: strengths
of corrections
Corrections are useful preliminary tool for reasearch by assessing the strengths and driection of a relationship between variables
Corrections are often used as a strating point to asses possible patterns between variables before researchers commit to an experimental study
Correlations are quick and economical to carry out. Secondary data can be used is it is less time consuming
limitations of correlations
Due to lack of experimental manipulation and control study can only tell us how variables are related not why
Corrections do not demonstrate cause and effect between variables and therefore we do not know which co variable cause the other to change
Intervening variable may be causing the relationship between the two co variables
Summary: correclations can osmically be missed or misinterpreted because relationships can appear causal when they aren’t
Primary data
refers to orginal data that has been collected specifically for the purpose of the investigation by the researcher.
It is data that arrives first hand form the participants - through experiment
Secondary data
Data that has been collected by someone else and their data is available to use if they want
We already know if there is some interesting significant between the variables
Stuff you didn’t collect yourself for your experiment