sociological exp (gov become complicit in their actions)

Question 1

what is the first section

Answer 1

-“crimes of obedience” kerman and hamilton
-violent state encourage their members to carry out human rights abuses even if they don’t agree

Question 2

how do states encourage members to carry out human rights abuses even if they don’t agree
(the 3 ways )

Answer 2

authorisation, dehumanisation , routinisation

Question 3

what is authorisation

Answer 3

-making it clear they are acting in accordance to the policy

Question 4

what is dehumanisation

Answer 4

-making the group who are the victim appear like they are subhuman or deserving of the treatment

Question 5

what is routinisation

Answer 5

-making activities look as though they are apart of a routine
e.g going work, carrying them out, going home

Question 6

what examples of state crime illustrate “crimes of obedience”

Answer 6

uhyghurs = treated as if they were subhuman; watched and patrolled consistently

Question 7

how can we evaluate the crimes of obedience

Answer 7

-hard to explain/understand- crimes are hard to research
-ranges hard to apply the explanation to all