science and sociology Flashcards

1
Q

what is science

A

-hypothesis based on evidence and facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what would posititivists say ab socio being a science

A

-it can be if it uses the methods of natural sciences
(bio,chem , physics)
-Quantitative- higher in reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what would interpretivitsts say ab socio being a science

A

-say cannot or shouldnt be bc humans have free will - cant control humans - free will(understanding) priortise validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

key features of when science emerged

A

-post industrial revolution (enlightenment period)
-comte, durk, marx - positivsts - writing in this period - trying to understand society in a positivist way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does popper claim about science

A

uses a ‘hypo deductive method’
-draws up question or hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the 8 features popper mentions

A

-hypothesis formation, falsification, use of empirical evidence , replication, accumulation of evidence, prediction, theory formation, scrunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is hypothesis formation

A

-forming ideas of informed guesses about the possible cause of phenomena

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is falsification

A

-popper believed you should not alwyas try to prove a hypothesis correct you should try and falsify it
i.e prove it wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the swan example that popper suggests

A

-are all swans white?
-hypothesis that can be tested
-but cant be proven true
-theres always a possibility of a non white swan
-they can hunt for non white swans to falsify their theory rather than trying to prove it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is use of empirical evidence

A

no hypothesis can be regarded as scientific hypothesis unless it capable of being falsidied (proven wrong)
by testing againist measurbale evidence from obs or exp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is replication

A

-capable of being checked by other researchers who can repeat anf replicate the findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

whats accumulation of evidence

A

-scientific knowledge builds up overtime
-through constant hypothesis formation , falsification, testing of data and hypothesis formation until robust and accurate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

whats prediction

A

-establishing cause and effect relationships rooted in evidence , precise predcitions of what will happen in same circumstances in future can be established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

whats theory formation

A
  • if hypotheses can be tested againist evidence and cant be show as false , predcition appears sound
    -then hypo probs true -can become scientfic theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

whats scrutiny?

A

-scientific theory will be scurntinised by other scientists and stand only until new evidence comes along to prove exisitng one false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is science to popper?

A

-capable of being falsified rather than verified
-a discipline that makes big generalisaitons and bold statements
-open to crticism and review and this leads to better scientific advances and theories

17
Q

reasons for socio to be a science for popper

A

-capable of producing hypothesis which can be falsified
-makes big statement and generalisations
-open to critism e.g neo marx criticise marx

18
Q

reasons for socio to not be a science for popper

A

-much of socio is unscientific cant be put to the test and falsified
marx predciction of revolution hasent happened but still could happen

19
Q

how can popper be evaluated

A

-feryabend criticises popper for portraying scientific method as being cold and rational process
-he claims that in reality theres no logic in science as diff scientists follow their own rules e.g phsyics diff to biology in science