The behavioural approach to explaining phobias Flashcards

1
Q

3 ways behaviourist approach re enforces behaviour

A

classical- association - bell and food (pavlov dogs)
-operant- learning by reward e.g skinner - press lever and get food via positive and negative reinforcement
-vicarious reinforcement= see others rewarded- bandura bobo doll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the two process model by mowrer 1960?

A

stage 1 is acquisition = classical conditoming (getting)
stage 2 is maintenance= operant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were the aims of the little albert study?

A
  • to see what by nature albert was afraid of
  • to see if new fears can be conditioned
  • see if fear of rat transfers to other animals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the procedure of little albert?

A
  • presented w various animals
  • burning newspapers and santa claus mask
    (which had no reaction at first)
  • hitting large metal bar and exposed to rat repeatedly w noise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the findings of little albert study?

A

-metal bar caused him to be startled
- stimulus generalisation occurred
(he generalised a rat with the metal sound)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the convulsion of the little albert study?

A

-fear can be learnt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

bad ethics of little albert study?

A

-life long fear
-animals didn’t consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluating little albert study

A

-questionable validity
-poor population validity ( only little albert)
-results not replicated so unreliable
-unethical rules (animals and little albert)
-lasting damage- albert not de conditioned
-very cruel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is accquisiton classical conditoning?

A

-intially has no fear of the neutral stimulus
with something that already triggers fear reponse (the Ucs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

accquistioning in little albert?

A

-loud sound (UCS) = FEAR (UCR)
-rat(ns) and the (UCS) encountered close tg
-NS then becomes associated with the (UCS) and now produces fear
-rat becomes (CS) = fear (CR)
-conditoning now generalised w similar objects e.g santas beard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

whats accquiring?

A

-association fear with traumatic experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

whats maintanence?

A

-negative reinforcemnt to avoid unpleasant stimulus
-for desirbale consequence so behaviour is repeated (as anxiety is reduced so phobia maintained)
-behaviour is rewarded or punished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaulating two process model
strength

A

(real world app)
-exposure therapies e.g systematic disenstitation
- in phobias avoidance behaviour reinforced by the experince of anxiety reduction
-so when avoidance prevented = phobia cured
(phobia and trauma exp)
e.g lil albert frigheting exp led to phobia
-ad de jongh - those scared of dental treatment had traumatic exp w densitry or victim of violent crime (73%)
-comapred to control grp of (21%) only exp traumatic exp with low dentala anxiety
-so asscoiation with truama and phobia is strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaulating two process model
limitation

A

(cognitive aspects)
-only explains behaviours
-phobias arent only avoidance responses
-people hold irritational beliefs ab spiders e.g dangerous
-no explanaiton for phobic cognitions
-no full explamiatiom of phobic symptoms
(counterpoint phobia and trauma)
-some phobias arent caused by trauma
-e.g snake phobias
some never encountered a snake
-so association isnt strong
(learning and evolution)- alternative exp
-explained by evolution theory
-accquired phobia of things that been presented as danger in past
-e.g snakes = prepardness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly