dealing w offending behaviour:behaviour modificaiton in custody Flashcards

1
Q

what is behaviour modification in custody

A

-approach from behaviourist which bases princples of operant conditoning
-undesirbale behaviours are replaced w desirbale ones thru positive/negative reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the behvaiour princple

A

-if behvaiour is learnt it should be possible to unlearn it w the same princples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the behvaiour modification programme

A

-reinforce obedient behvaiour while punishing disobedience in hope it dies out
-done by token systems in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are token economy systems

A

-managed by prison staff to modify behaviour
-OPERANT CONDITIONING = reinforce the desirable behaviours and avoid conflict
-e.g rewarded for being quiet in cells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how do the tokens themseleves work

A

-the token itself isnt a reward’-the token is exhanged for something of desire e.g phone call/ extra food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the diff type of reinforcers in the system

A

PRIMARY reinforces= rewards
SECONDARY reinforcers = tokens (derives from its value as associaiton w the reward)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why is important about this system

A

-b ehaviours rewards made clear to prisoners in advance
-disobedience means rewards/ tokens are removed(punishment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are 3 steps to desigining and using the token system

A

-operationalise target behvaiours, scoring system, train staff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how are target behaviours operationalised

A

-broken down into componenets
-e.g target being improving intercations with inmates
-may be broken down into not touching others when going past them, speaking nicely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how should operationalised behaviours look

A

-objective and measurable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the scoring system

A

-should be made aware of how much each behaviour is ‘worth’
-demanding behaciour may get more rewards
-improved interactions may include ‘working coperatively in grp tasks’ and ‘ not swearing’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how may alternative token systems work

A

-may award directly or through points converted to tokens
-reinforcemnts should outnumber punishments by a ratio of 4:1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how should staff be trained

A

-involve sveral hrs of trianing for weeks
-aim to standardise procedures so staff reward in the same way
-staff need to record awareded token so progress of prisosners assesed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

whats the conjugal visit

A

-scheduleded visit where inmmate permitted to spend several hrs or days in priavte w a visiitor normal spouse
-may engage in sex
-illegal in UK
-legal in 6 states in USA
-may decrease sexual and physical vio in prisons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did cohen and filipczk find of the long term effects of the system

A

-token economy presented more desirbale behaviours then control grp
-and less likely to have re offedned
-however after 3 yrs eates of re offence was back to national stats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what do cohens and F’s findings suggest

A

-theres delayed recidivism
-benefits of beh modification may not generlaise beyond a prsion setting bc you cant get token system outside

17
Q

strenghts of this theory

A

(research support)
Hobbs and Holt (1976) observed a
significant difference is positive behaviour compared to the
non-token economy group.
Field et al (2004) found that a token economy system used with
young people with behavioural problems was generally effective,
although there were still some that did not respond.
Later they were placed on a special programme where the rewards
were more immediate and more frequent and the results were
more positive.
Suggests that token economy systems do work.

(easy to implement)
Unlike for other treatments e.g. anger management, behaviour
modification does not require specialist professionals. It is also
cost-effective and easy to follow This suggests that behaviour modification techniques can be
established in most prisons and accessed by most prisoners.

18
Q

weaknesses of this theory

A

(counterpoint to research support)
Bassett and Blanchard (1977) found that any benefits were lost
if staff applied the techniques inconsistently.
This was due to factors such as lack of training or high staff turnover
This suggests that behaviour modification schemes must ensure full and consistent staff participation if they are to work.

(little rehab value)
May not affect long-term behaviour.
Token economies, according to Blackburn (1993), “have little rehabilitative value” – any
positive changes may quickly be lost when offenders are released. Progress is unlikely to be
assured upon release since law-abiding behaviour is not rewarded/reinforced on the outside.
Rewards the offender receives from breaking the law (such as group status) may be more
powerful than abiding by the token economy.
Cognitive based treatments may be more effective likely to lead to a permanent change as
they require the offenders to understand the cause of their offending and to take
responsibility for their own rehabilitation.
Offenders can easily play along with token economy systems in order to access rewards with
little change in their character.
This may explain why once the token economy is discontinued, an offender may regress back
to their former behaviour.

19
Q

what are the ethical issues with this theory

A

The conditions of behaviour modification are regarded as manipulative and dehumanising
by some e.g. Moya and Achtenburg (1974).
Offenders are not given the option over whether they participate in the token economy.
Withdrawal of privileges such as exercise or phone calls to loved ones may also be ethically
questionable.
This questions the morality and fairness of using token economy systems.