PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS : DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what does differential association theory propose

A

individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques and motives for offending behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

continue with the differential association theory in essence …

A

one person may associate with people who have every negative attitudes to crime

another may be exposed to more positive attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 subtopics

A

scientific basis

offending as a learned behaviour

socialisation in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SCIENTIFIC BASIS - what tasks did sutherland set himself

A

the task of developng aset of scientific principles that could explain all types of offennding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SCIENTIFIC BASIS - what were the scientific principles sutherland developed

A

the conditions which are said to cause crime should be present when crime is present

and they shoudl absent when crime is absent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SCIENTIFIC BASIS - sutherlands theory was and is designed to

A

discriminate between individuals who become offenders and those who don’t

whatever tehir social clas or ethnic background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - offendinng behaviour may be acquired in the same way as

A

the same way as any other behaviour through the process of learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - how does offending behaviour learnign occur

A

most often through interactions with significant others who child values most and spemds the most time with

such as family and peer group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - what does differential association suggest

  • hint maths
A

it shoudl be possible to mathematically predict how likely it is that an individual will commit offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - what do we need to know how to mathematically predict how likely it is an indiviudal will commit offences

A

know the

-frequency
- intensity

and duration of exposure to deviant and non deviant norms and values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - offending arise from what two factors

A

learned attitudes towards offending

the learning of specific offending acts/techniques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING ATTITUDES - When a persons socialised into a group they will be exposed to

A

values and attitudes towards the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING ATTITUDES - when person socialised into a group theyre exposed to values and attitudes towards the law what will these values be

A

some values will be pro crime

others will be anti crime values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING ATTITUDES - what did sutherland argue about pro and anti crime attitudes int erms of weighting

A

if number of pro crime attitudes the perosn acquires outweights the number of anti crime attitudes

they will go onto offend

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING ATTITUDES - the learning process is the

A

same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING ATTITUDES - the learnign process is the same whether

A

a person is learning offending or conformity to the law

(or anything else for that matter)

17
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING TECHNIQUES -

in addition to being exposed to pro crime atittudes, the would be offender may also learn

A

particular techniques for comitting offences

18
Q

OFFENDING AS A LEARNED BEHAVIOUR - LEARNING TECHNIQUES - what may learning techniques include

A

how to break into someones house through a locked window

or how to disable a car stereo before stealing it

19
Q

SOCIALISATION IN PRISON - as well as offering an accoutn of how offending may x amongst x social groups and in x . sunderlands theory can also account for

A

as well as offering an account of how offending may breed amonfst specific social groups and in communties
sunderlands theory cna also account for

20
Q

SOCIALISATION IN PRISON - what can sutherlands thoery also account for

A

why so many convicts released from prison go onto reoffend

21
Q

SOCIALISATION IN PRISON - in terms of sutherlands theory or reoffending we can assume whilst inside prison , inmates learn

from other

that they may

A

specific techniques of offending

from other more experienced offenders

that they may put into practice upon their release

22
Q

SOCIALISATION IN PRISON - learning in prison may occur through

A

observaitonal learning and imitiation

direct tuition from offendnig peers

23
Q

LIMITAIOTN - LACKS OBJECTIVITY

A

Lacks objectivity – Although Sutherland promised to provide a scientific framework for crime, it is very difficult to measure the number of pro-criminal attitudes a person has been exposed to as many of the concepts cannot be operatoinalised ; Sutherland was not able to provide a measure that informed us of the point in which an individual would turn to crime i.e. the trigger point. Therefore, this undermined its scientific credibility.

24
Q

LIMITATION/ counterpoint - social sensitivity

A

Social sensitivity: This theory may lead to discrimination by creating a stereotypes that you can be perceived as a criminal through association. As Sutherland’s theory suggests that certain groups display similar crimes, it could mean that there is a danger of making assumptions that those who come from impoverished, crime-ridden backgrounds, will inevitably turn to crime.

which ignores the fact people may not choose to offend despite influences as not everyone who is exposed to pro-crime attiudes goes on to offend

25
Q

strenght - shift of focus

A

one strength of the differential association theory is, at the time it was first published, it changed the focus of offending explanations

Sutherland was successful in moving the emphasis away from early biological accounts of offending, such as Lombroso’s atavistic theory

as well as away from theories that explained offending as a product of individual weakness or immorality

differential association theory draws attention n to the fact that deviant social circumstances and environments may be more to blame for offending than deviant people

this approach is more desirable as it offers a more realistic solution to problem of offending instead of eugenics (biological solution) or punishment (morality solution)

26
Q

strength - wider reach

A

further strength of the differential association theory is that it can account for offending within all sectors of society

whilst Sutherland recognised that some types of offence, such as burglary, may be clustered within certain inner-city, working class communities, it’s also the case that some offences are clustered amongst more wealthy groups in society,

Sutherland was interested in corporate offences and how this may be a feature of middle-class social groups who share deviant norms and values

shows that it’s not just the ‘lower’ class who commit offences and that the principles of differential association can be used to explain all offences