2.6.2 Kohlberg Evaluation Flashcards
(ecological validity) why did Kohlberg’s research lack ecological validity?
hypothetical moral dilemmas e.g. cancer drug scenario
(ecological validity) Gilligan - Kohlberg’s research wasn’t based on real life what?
decisions
(ecological validity) Gilligan - the hypothetical scenarios would make little sense to who?
the younger children
(ecological validity) Gilligan’s own research was based on what?
people’s own moral dilemmas e.g. abortion
(ecological validity) what does it mean to lack ecological validity?
not reflective of real life
(population validity) what does population validity refer to?
whether the participants in the sample are representative of the whole population
(population validity) why was Kohlberg’s research androcentric, containing a beta gender bias?
all male sample
stages of development then generalised to women - says there is no difference
(population validity) Gilligan said men and women show different what?
morality
(population validity) Gilligan said men have a morality of what?
justice
(population validity) Gilligan said women have a morality of what?
care
(population validity) Gilligan - Kohlberg’s dilemmas were focused on justice which could make women be perceived as what?
morally inferior if using Kohlberg’s stages
(population validity) But Gilligan’s findings are not reliable, why?
both men and women use both types of reasoning
(population validity) Walter found women were not what?
rated differently using Kohlberg’s stages
(culture bias) the research was good as it was what?
cross cultural
(culture bias) why could Kohlberg’s moral dilemmas be viewed as eurocentric? and why is this an issue?
developed in west
they may be interpreted differently in non western cultures and therefore are not applicable