purp com midterm lesson 2 Flashcards
Effective persuasion demands formulating arguments along three types of appeals, also called
Rhetorical Triangle
three kinds of persuasive appeals that ancient rhetorician name
logos (logical appeal)
pathos (emotional appeal)
ethos (appeal to credibility of the person conveying the message).
information, argument reasons, evidence, date, structure
message
Beliefs, values
Knowledge, experience
Audience
Ethos, (credibility, authority
Correctness, appearance, eloquence
Communicator
aims to convince the reader of the author’s point.
Writing persuasive essay
refers primarily to the internal consistency and clarity of the message and to the logic of its reasons and support
Logos (Appeal to logic or reason)
often associated with “empathy”, that is , how you can vicariously make your audience feel the way you feel.
pathos(Appeal to emotion)
pertains to the way you establish trust in your audience-how you portray yourself as an authority
Ethos(Appeal to credibility)
in general term is an error in reasoning.
Fallacies
We all have committed using fallacies that are “deceptive or wrong arguments” (Espiritu, 2014)
To avoid using fallacies, is to learn good reasoning which includes understanding bad reasoning (Espiritu, 2014)
Some fallacies :
Argumentum against the person
Argument that goes in circle
Non sequitor or “It does not follow”
Argument that uses flattery or praise
Argument that appeals to force or threat
Hasty generalization
Argument from ignorance
Bandwagon argument
Appeal to pity
Fallacy of division
Appeal unqualified (or inappropriate authority)
Red herring
What is new is good
The arguer evades the real conclusion in new words, making the reasoning circular.
Argument that goes in circle
The arguer draws a conclusion not supported by the premises or fails to include assumptions that establish connections between ideas.
Non sequitor or “It does not follow”
the arguer directs his attack on the character
Argumentum against the person
we use praise to get what we want, to make other agree with us, or to seek approval of our arguments.
Argument that uses flattery or praise
One uses force or threat instead of reason. The threat may be physical or psychological.
Argument that appeals to force or threat
The arguer makes a conclusion based on a few instances or even from one single instance onlh.
Hasty generalization
This is arguing that because an arguer cannot prove the argument to be false; therefore, it is true.
Argument from ignorance
The argument appeals to the beliefs or prejudices of the crowd or masses. It justifies that “might is right” and “many people cannot be wrong”. This is widely used in advertisements and political campaigns.
Bandwagon argument
e resort to evoking pity or sympathy by pointing or referring to an unfortunate circumstance that has befallen us.
Appeal to pity
We argue that what is true of a whole or class is true to every member
Fallacy of division
when we cite the opinion or judgement of someone who commands respect and reverence but who is not a recognized authority on the subjec to who is prejudiced in some way.
Appeal unqualified (or inappropriate authority)
he arguer introduces an unrelated or irrelevant matter to draw the argument away from the real issue.
Red herring
The arguer contends or makes a case on the belief that what is new is good.
What is new is good