purp com midterm lesson 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Effective persuasion demands formulating arguments along three types of appeals, also called

A

Rhetorical Triangle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

three kinds of persuasive appeals that ancient rhetorician name

A

logos (logical appeal)
pathos (emotional appeal)
ethos (appeal to credibility of the person conveying the message).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

information, argument reasons, evidence, date, structure

A

message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Beliefs, values
Knowledge, experience

A

Audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ethos, (credibility, authority
Correctness, appearance, eloquence

A

Communicator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

aims to convince the reader of the author’s point.

A

Writing persuasive essay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

refers primarily to the internal consistency and clarity of the message and to the logic of its reasons and support

A

Logos (Appeal to logic or reason)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

often associated with “empathy”, that is , how you can vicariously make your audience feel the way you feel.

A

pathos(Appeal to emotion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

pertains to the way you establish trust in your audience-how you portray yourself as an authority

A

Ethos(Appeal to credibility)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

in general term is an error in reasoning.

A

Fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

We all have committed using fallacies that are “deceptive or wrong arguments” (Espiritu, 2014)

A

To avoid using fallacies, is to learn good reasoning which includes understanding bad reasoning (Espiritu, 2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Some fallacies :

A

Argumentum against the person
Argument that goes in circle
Non sequitor or “It does not follow”
Argument that uses flattery or praise
Argument that appeals to force or threat
Hasty generalization
Argument from ignorance
Bandwagon argument
Appeal to pity
Fallacy of division
Appeal unqualified (or inappropriate authority)
Red herring
What is new is good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The arguer evades the real conclusion in new words, making the reasoning circular.

A

Argument that goes in circle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The arguer draws a conclusion not supported by the premises or fails to include assumptions that establish connections between ideas.

A

Non sequitor or “It does not follow”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the arguer directs his attack on the character

A

Argumentum against the person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

we use praise to get what we want, to make other agree with us, or to seek approval of our arguments.

A

Argument that uses flattery or praise

15
Q

One uses force or threat instead of reason. The threat may be physical or psychological.

A

Argument that appeals to force or threat

16
Q

The arguer makes a conclusion based on a few instances or even from one single instance onlh.

A

Hasty generalization

17
Q

This is arguing that because an arguer cannot prove the argument to be false; therefore, it is true.

A

Argument from ignorance

18
Q

The argument appeals to the beliefs or prejudices of the crowd or masses. It justifies that “might is right” and “many people cannot be wrong”. This is widely used in advertisements and political campaigns.

A

Bandwagon argument

19
Q

e resort to evoking pity or sympathy by pointing or referring to an unfortunate circumstance that has befallen us.

A

Appeal to pity

20
Q

We argue that what is true of a whole or class is true to every member

A

Fallacy of division

21
Q

when we cite the opinion or judgement of someone who commands respect and reverence but who is not a recognized authority on the subjec to who is prejudiced in some way.

A

Appeal unqualified (or inappropriate authority)

22
Q

he arguer introduces an unrelated or irrelevant matter to draw the argument away from the real issue.

A

Red herring

22
Q

The arguer contends or makes a case on the belief that what is new is good.

A

What is new is good