3.2 Functionalists on Crime & Deviance Flashcards
what did Durkheim see crime as?
good and inevitable for society
why is crime inevitable (D)?
you cannot socialise everyone perfectly
not everyone will agree with authority and the value consensus
what is a society of saints? (D)
a society in which there is no crime committed
why would there still be deviance in a society of saints? (D)
there will always be something classed as unacceptable e.g. bad manners would become an offence
crime is functional (D) as it promotes social solidarity and strengthens bonds, how?
shared outrage
us and them response
crime is functional (D) as it reinforces collective conscience, how?
by telling us what is right and wrong
crime is functional (D) as it maintains boundaries, how?
it reinforces the line of acceptable and unacceptable
what is public degradation (Erikson)?
when members of a community participate in the confrontation of a criminal
(Erikson) public degradation was formerly carried out as public punishments, such as:
hangings
(Erikson) how is public degradation carried out today?
public trials and media coverage
(Erikson) give some examples of shifting boundaries: (things formerly as bad, but not now)
homosexuality
divorce
single parenthood
crime is functional (D) as it can be a warning of what?
something wrong e.g. anomie
what is anomie?
sense of normlessness
how might anomie lead to crime?
people don’t know how to behave
crime is functional (D) as it is the start of social change, give an example:
the suffragettes
marches, protests and illegal acts to gain attention
crime is functional (D) as it is a safety valve, how?
minor crimes allow people to let off stem preventing worsening crime
what did Davis say about prostitution?
safety valve
outlet for men, less threatening to the family unit
what are some strengths of Durkheim’s argument?
explains why crime is good and inevitable
societies perspective - social impact of crime