2.1 RM - Documents & Content Analysis Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What can documents be?

A
Written 
Photos 
Media 
Private 
Public 
Historical 
Maps 
Drawings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are practical strengths of documents?

A
  • quick and cheap
  • published ones are easily accessible
  • no personal risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are practical weaknesses of documents?

A
  • only access published ones

* qualitative data is hard to analyse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are ethical strengths of documents?

A

No issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are reliable strengths of documents?

A

Regularly published documents can be compared reliably and over time e.g ofsted reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are reliable weaknesses of documents?

A

Usually unstandardised can’t be repeated in same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are representative strengths of documents?

A

Large and representative sample of regularly published documents such as newspapers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are representative weaknesses of documents?

A
  • small samples of personal documents

* John Scott - can’t be sure that historical documents reflect typical ideas of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are validity strengths of documents?

A
  • insight into author - personal documents

* insight you wouldn’t be able to get otherwise - historical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain John Scott’s valid weaknesses of documents, authenticity:

A

Historical documents aren’t always authentic they can be forgeries or errors from year of copying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain John Scott’s valid weaknesses of documents, credibility:

A

The author may be deliberately misleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain John Scott’s valid weaknesses of documents, meaning:

A

Words can change meaning over time and different researchers will interpret differently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do media documents include?

A
Newspapers 
Novels 
Autobiography 
Adverts 
Tv 
Radio 
Posters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does formal content analysis attempt to do?

A

Quantify and classify content in an objective manner - count how many times something occurs using a category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give an example of formal content analysis:

A

E.g counting gender stereotyping instances in a tv show

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is good about formal content analysis?

A

Effective measure of straightforward aspects

17
Q

What is bad about formal content analysis?

A

Says little about the meaning of documents to their audience or producer

18
Q

What does thematic analysis do?

A

Looks for bias in the way things are reported - the motives and ideology underlying documents

19
Q

Give an example of motives underlying documents:

A

News reflecting interests of powerful groups

20
Q

What did Glasgow uni media group find using thematic analysis:

A

The news reflects pro-management anti Union bias in industrial disputes

21
Q

What are some criticisms of thematic analysis?

A
  • is the document being misinterpreted

* does the bias matter to its audience

22
Q

What does textual analysis do?

A

Examines text closely to see how it encourages particular reading

23
Q

Give an example of how headlines push for certain reading:

A

Innocent victim vs. Evil perpetrator

24
Q

What are criticisms of textual analysis?

A

Misinterpretation

not what producer intended

25
Q

What are strengths of content analysis?

A
  • Cheap
  • researcher can compare different sources longitudinally
  • quantitative - reliable repeated using same content analysis schedule
26
Q

What are weaknesses of content analysis?

A
  • time consuming - longitudinal
  • subjective - categories decided by researcher
  • analysing texts out of context
  • don’t tell us about society or public opinion
  • can’t assume bias messages impact audiences