Research; Part 2 Flashcards
Learning Outcomes:
- Biomedical research– The different types of research is implemented
- Reset ethics
- How to Read research
- What kind of research are best suited to natural medicine?
- Referencing and plagiarism
- Incorporating biomedical research into practice
- How should we engage in research as natural medicine practitioners?
Revision of basic concepts
It is important to realise that any activity that involves active experimentation with health outcomes is legitimate research.
* This includes the empirical research (based on observation) conducted by pioneers of natural medicine, no matter that is not been ‘verified’ by conventional ‘scientific’ research.
* Much biomedical research is reductionist, dealing only with reduced portions of the reality at stake. We have provisionally called this isolated research.
Biomedical research
Why learn about biomedical research?
* To be able to communicate with other professionals such as medical profession
* To understand concepts and mechanisms that might be applicable in clinical practice
* To avoid negative interactions between therapeutic choices
* To gain knowledge about levels of toxicity and safe upper limit for supplements or natural compounds
Research models: quantitative and qualitative
Two basic research types:
* Quantitative research: refers to any research based on numerical data that can be accurately and precisely measured, such as blood chemistry, etc. Most medical research is quantitative.
* Quantitative research: refers to research based on more abstract data, that is more challenging to accurately and precisely measure, such as the way people about something, or why they prefer one thing over another. More helpful in natural medicine
Quantitative biomedical research
Seeks to provide statistics in answer to specific questions and includes:
* In vitro (Latin = ‘in glass’) – done in laboratories
* Animal trials
* Human clinical trials, including RCTs
* Systematic review
* Literature review
* Meta-analysis
* Epidemiological studies
* Retrospective studies
* Prospect studies
Biomedical research: Systematic review
Systematic review: a review of all available literature (i.e. clinical studies) on a drug, in order to analyse the evidence for or against its effectiveness; PG review of all herbal medicines used anxiety.
Biomedical research: Literature review
Literature review: like systematic review, that may take other kinds of literature as evidence, such as the theory of pharmacology. Broader scope than the Systematic Review; e.g. review of the pharmacology and biological activity of Devil’s claw.
Biomedical research: Meta-analysis
Meta analysis: that is the core procedure for combining data from multiple studies. The reality is that it often distorts evidenced by including research that is flawed.
Biomedical research:
Epidemiological
Epidemiological: the ‘how and why’ of disease in particular population: e.g. “Why does Scotland have higher rates of multiple sclerosis?” (But often does not look at the whole picture).
Biomedical research: Retrospective study
Retrospective study: a historical investigation of a particular issue or factor in health; usually involves comparison with the non-affected group.
Biomedical research: Prospective study
Prospective study: follows a group of subjects over a period of time to find out what happens to them. Relies on the continuing availability and willingness of research participants.
Biomedical research:
Descriptive study
Descriptive study: describes the current situation, e.g. “how many cancer patients have also tried homoeopathic remedies?”
Ethics in research
Biomedical research: governed by Ethical codes of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
Common principles include:
* Beneficence – the act of doing good
* Non-malfeasance – “do no harm”
* Confidentiality of research subjects
* Right to quit research at any time
* Right of research to be fully informed
* Correct and complete disposal of personal data
* Maintenance of high standards in science
However: research conducted on animals is cruel and, therefore not ethical. Animals have feelings too.
Narrative Medicine (quantitative)
Narrative Medicine (quantitative): currently under development in the World Health Organisation as the counterbalance to the RCT model of quantitative research.
* An approach that utilises the narratives of patients in clinical practice and in research, in order to better understanding nature of their health problems.
* Involves paying particular attention to what patients actually say in the medical consultation
Case studies
Case studies: Notes practitioners take in consultations with patients are an invaluable source of information about what works in treatment.
* Sharing case studies is a invaluable way for practitioners to compare notes and share their experiences of what works in practical applications
* Case studies deal with real people in all their complexity and are therefore useful in identifying individual responses to treatments
* Case studies are rich source of data
Outcomes Research
Outcomes Research:
* Assesses the delivery of care in a particular context
* Can be used to demonstrate the effectiveness of specific therapeutic interventions
* Assesses the use of resources
* Is a multidisciplinary investigation, capable of covering a variety of issues
* Assesses the benefit to the users– Patients
* Is well-suited to the delivery of care in general, as opposed to the effectiveness of individual medications.
Outcomes Research – Methods and Aims
Outcomes Research – Methods and Aims
* Questionnaire to all patients in clinic to get their impressions, levels of satisfaction, success of their treatment.
* May also assess the cost, convenience, geographical accessibility and patient preferences, as well as actual treatment.
* Enables service providers to insure the best use of resources
* Patients also have a stake in outcome research because it facilitates decision-making: what treatment is best for them, given they are ultimately paying service.