Medical Law Flashcards
Purpose of the law
To establish and define standards of acceptable (e.g. respect for autonomy)
To maintain standards and punish ‘offences’
To protect the vulnerable (e.g. certain ‘consent’ cases must come before a court)
Above all – to achieve the resolution of disputes
Types of the law
Criminal law Civil law (e.g. Contract & Tort) Public law (e.g. Judicial Review (JR))
Sources of law
Statute
Common law/ case law
Statute - source of law
Abortion Act 1967 Human Tissue Act 2004 Human Fertilisation & Embryology Act 1990 Human Rights Act 1998 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005
Common Law/ Case Law
Judge – made law based on a system of Precedent
Judgements made by higher courts (i.e. Supreme Court & Court of Appeal) have to be followed by lower Courts and in future cases
Regulation and professional guidances
EU Directive – European Working tine Directive; consumer protection
GMC – licensing of doctors
Regulatory bodies – HSE, PHSO, Human Tissue Authority, HFEA
What must a pt establish to make a negligence claim
- That they were owed a duty of care
- That the duty of care was ‘breached’
- That they have sustained an injury (loss)
- Injury was ‘caused’ by that breach of duty (causation)
Must be within limitation period
Breach of duty
‘Failing to act in accordance w/ the standards of reasonably competent medical men acting in the relevant field at the relevant time’
Example of something that is not ethical but lawful
Under old Human Tissue Act (1961) patients agreed to retention of ‘tissue’ - but didn’t realise this could involve whole organs
Example of something that is not lawful but ethical
Mercy killings
Advance decisions - MCA
Refusal of life saving treatment:
18+ and mentally competent
Must be in writing
Be signed and witnessed
Must be clear what treatment is being refused & under what circumstances
State clearly that the decision applies, even if life is at risk
Where does the duty of confidentiality come from
Legal - HRA 1998, DPA 2008
Professional codes of conduct
Terms of employment
Tech problems causing confidentiality issues
Misdirected emails where 2 people have similar names
Email forwarding
Info lost, left somewhere or stolen e.g. unencrypted memory sticks, ward/team handover notes
Casual convo problems causing confidentiality issues
Many improper disclosures are unintentional
Patients in the public eye
Social media problems causing confidentiality issues
GMC Doctors’ Use of Social Media (2013)
Facebook/ Twitter
Peer Group Forums
Consequences of a breach of confidentiality
Serious persistent failure to follow GMC guidance puts your registration at risk
Criminal prosecution
Dismissal
Embarrassment and bad publicity for employer
Financial penalty for your employer
Who are entitled rot same duty of confidence as adults
Young people aged 16-17
Sliding scale of competence
Younger you are, harder to demonstrate you have ability to make decisions for yourself; perverse – right to consent treatment but not deny
What rights does a child have if they are Gilick competent
Rights of the child to have confidential advice and treatment more important than any rights of the patient
What are child <16 owed if they are not Gilick competent
A duty of confidentiality, which may not arise in practice due to inability of giving consent
Adults who lack capacity
Owed a duty of confidentiality
However, s4(7) MCA 2005 states that people who are in involved in their care should be consulted about their wishes and any relevant values and beliefs
Discussions must be limited and disclosures in the best interest of pt
Confidentiality and deceased pt
Generally considered that duty of confidentiality survives death
Circumstances in which relevant info has to be disclosed e.g. to assist coroner or when required by law
Cases where you can breach confidentiality
- Consent of patient (implied or expressed)
- In the patient’s best interests
- Required by Law (statue and judge-ordered)
- For the protection of patients and others – ‘public interest’
Breach confidentiality - consent
Pt must understand what Is to be disclosed and why
Disclosure kept to a minimum