Medical Law Flashcards
Purpose of the law
To establish and define standards of acceptable (e.g. respect for autonomy)
To maintain standards and punish ‘offences’
To protect the vulnerable (e.g. certain ‘consent’ cases must come before a court)
Above all – to achieve the resolution of disputes
Types of the law
Criminal law Civil law (e.g. Contract & Tort) Public law (e.g. Judicial Review (JR))
Sources of law
Statute
Common law/ case law
Statute - source of law
Abortion Act 1967 Human Tissue Act 2004 Human Fertilisation & Embryology Act 1990 Human Rights Act 1998 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005
Common Law/ Case Law
Judge – made law based on a system of Precedent
Judgements made by higher courts (i.e. Supreme Court & Court of Appeal) have to be followed by lower Courts and in future cases
Regulation and professional guidances
EU Directive – European Working tine Directive; consumer protection
GMC – licensing of doctors
Regulatory bodies – HSE, PHSO, Human Tissue Authority, HFEA
What must a pt establish to make a negligence claim
- That they were owed a duty of care
- That the duty of care was ‘breached’
- That they have sustained an injury (loss)
- Injury was ‘caused’ by that breach of duty (causation)
Must be within limitation period
Breach of duty
‘Failing to act in accordance w/ the standards of reasonably competent medical men acting in the relevant field at the relevant time’
Example of something that is not ethical but lawful
Under old Human Tissue Act (1961) patients agreed to retention of ‘tissue’ - but didn’t realise this could involve whole organs
Example of something that is not lawful but ethical
Mercy killings
Advance decisions - MCA
Refusal of life saving treatment:
18+ and mentally competent
Must be in writing
Be signed and witnessed
Must be clear what treatment is being refused & under what circumstances
State clearly that the decision applies, even if life is at risk
Where does the duty of confidentiality come from
Legal - HRA 1998, DPA 2008
Professional codes of conduct
Terms of employment
Tech problems causing confidentiality issues
Misdirected emails where 2 people have similar names
Email forwarding
Info lost, left somewhere or stolen e.g. unencrypted memory sticks, ward/team handover notes
Casual convo problems causing confidentiality issues
Many improper disclosures are unintentional
Patients in the public eye
Social media problems causing confidentiality issues
GMC Doctors’ Use of Social Media (2013)
Facebook/ Twitter
Peer Group Forums
Consequences of a breach of confidentiality
Serious persistent failure to follow GMC guidance puts your registration at risk
Criminal prosecution
Dismissal
Embarrassment and bad publicity for employer
Financial penalty for your employer
Who are entitled rot same duty of confidence as adults
Young people aged 16-17
Sliding scale of competence
Younger you are, harder to demonstrate you have ability to make decisions for yourself; perverse – right to consent treatment but not deny
What rights does a child have if they are Gilick competent
Rights of the child to have confidential advice and treatment more important than any rights of the patient
What are child <16 owed if they are not Gilick competent
A duty of confidentiality, which may not arise in practice due to inability of giving consent
Adults who lack capacity
Owed a duty of confidentiality
However, s4(7) MCA 2005 states that people who are in involved in their care should be consulted about their wishes and any relevant values and beliefs
Discussions must be limited and disclosures in the best interest of pt
Confidentiality and deceased pt
Generally considered that duty of confidentiality survives death
Circumstances in which relevant info has to be disclosed e.g. to assist coroner or when required by law
Cases where you can breach confidentiality
- Consent of patient (implied or expressed)
- In the patient’s best interests
- Required by Law (statue and judge-ordered)
- For the protection of patients and others – ‘public interest’
Breach confidentiality - consent
Pt must understand what Is to be disclosed and why
Disclosure kept to a minimum
Implied consent - confidentiality
Can disclose info to other members of the healthcare team and family unless pt has explicitly said not to
Breaching confidentiality in the best interest of the pt
Emergency situations e.g in A&E
Only disclose relevant info
Breaching confidentiality - law statute
Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 NHS counter Fraud Investigations GMC – investigation of a doctor’s fitness to practice
Breaching confidentiality in public interest
To prevent and support detection, investigation and punishment of serious crime
And/or prevent abuse or serious harm to others
Public good outweighs confidentiality obligations
Extent of disclosure in the public interest
Proportionate and limited to the relevant details
Each decision must be on its own merits
Wherever possible disclosure should be discussed w/ the individual concerned and consent sought
Record should be kept to show the circumstances in which the decision to disclose was made
Healthcare professionals should not see their role as police informants
Police and public interest discussion
Serious crime and national security e.g. murder, rape, treason, kidnapping or serious harm to the surety of the state or to public order, crimes involving substantial financial gain
Theft, fraud or damage to property where loss and damage is not substantial doesn’t warrant breach in confidence
Caldicott principles
Staff who have access to personal info should handle them as defined by the Caldicott principles
Responsibility of Caldicott Guardians
Safeguarding and governing the uses of patient information within the Trust and acting as the ‘conscience’ of the Trust
Right of rectification
Data subjects have the right to correct data if it is inaccurate or incomplete
Do clinical opinions count as inaccurate data
Even if it turns out not to have been correct, can allow a patient to add a note to records indicating that they disagree
Right of erasure
Allows an individual to request removal or deletion of personal data where the example the data is no longer necessary for the purpose it was collected
Doesn’t apply to healthy records
What constitutes a battery
Performing the wrong operation
Ignoring a spp prohibition against treatment
Ignoring a withdrawal of consent e.g. continuing to ventilate a patient
Performing unnecessary treatment e.g. procedures that aren’t clinically indicated
What constitutes valid consent according to DOH
- Patient must have capacity to consent to intervention
- Patient must be appropriately informed
- Must be given voluntarily – no under any undue influence
Key principles of MCA
PLUMB
Presumption of capacity Least restrictive Unwise decisions Maximise capacity Best interests
Presumption of capacity - MCA
Most people can make some decisions
Least restrictive - MCA
Consider all the ways to promote rights and freedom
Unwise decisions - MCA
Remember unwise is not the same as unable
Best interests - MCA
If an individual lacks capacity, any decision made/ actions taken must be made in their best interest (in a wider sense)
Stages of determining capacity
Stage 1 – is the patient suffering from an impairment of, or a disturbance in the functioning of, the mind or brain?
Stage 2 – does the disturbance/ impairment make a person unable to make decision for himself, at the time. Use a functional test
Functional test - capacity
a. To understand the info relevant to the decision
b. To retain that info; or
c. To use or weigh that info as part of the process of making the decision; or
d. To communicate his decision (whether by talking, using sign language or any other means)
Mental capacity and mental illness
A patient can still have mental capacity even where they have a mental disorder e.g. schizophrenia: Re C (Refusal of Treatment) [1994] – had gangrene and thought he was doctor so refused treatment
Temporary factors that can erode capacity
Shock, pain or drugs
Re MB [1997] – Needle phobia render a patient temporarily incapable of making a decision, needed C-section but was too afraid so doctors did it anyways and won case
What should we do for pts who lack capacity
Section 1(5) MCA - If the patient lacks capacity to make a decision, clinicians must act in their ‘best interests’
Section 4 MCA
For patients who don’t have capacity
- Encourage patient participation and find out their views by speaking to next of kin
- Identify all the relevant circumstances e.g. religion
- Avoid discrimination/ assumptions
- Assess whether the patient will regain capacity
- Does the decision concern life sustaining treatment?
- Duty to consult others
Material risk
Would a reasonable person in the patients position attach significance to it, or the DR knows that a patient would attach sig. to it
Considerations for material risk
Effect on that patient
The importance to the patient of the benefits/ desire to have treatment Alt. treatments available Risks associated w/ alt. treatment
Choosing reasonable alternatives to suggested treatment
Must know about procedure
Must be accepted practice
Must be an appropriate option, not a possible option
Not a variant of current treatment
Consent - undue influence
Consent must be given voluntarily and freely, without pressure or undue influence - DOH Re T (Adult: Refusal of medical treatment) [1992] – refusal of blood transfusion, undue influence from mother who was a Jehovah witness. Suffered haemorrhage and died
Standard consent forms
Form 1 – adults or children w/ mental capacity
Form 2 – parental consent to treatment/ investigation of a child or YP
Form 3 – procedure spp consent form
Form 4 – adults who lack mental capacity
Negligence
Any act or omission which falls short of the standard to be expected
Part of civil law
Examples of clinical negligence
Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis
Incorrect treatment
Surgical mistakes
Prescribing inappropriate medication
Causation - negligence claims
The claimant must show the breach of duty caused (or materially contributed to) the harm or injury
The burden of establishing that the breach caused harm rests w/ the claimant
What does a Dr need to successfully defend a negligence claim
Call evidence that shows:
A reasonable body of doctors
Skilled in that particular speciality
Would’ve done just the same as the defendant doctor did
With the exception of consent cases the Bolam test is applied to all aspects of the doctor/ patient rship
What should happen if a Dr goes against guidelines
Clear documentation of the reasoning behind the decision should be made
How can you discharge your duty of care
Seek advice the assistance from more senior colleagues
Make a note of advice in the medical records: date, time, who spoke to and the agreed plan
The responsibility then falls on the more senior colleague
The ‘but for’ test
To establish causation the claimant must answer “but for the Defendant’s negligence would the harm have occurred to the claimant in any event?”
Balance of probabilities is also used