Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

MBBS - Year 1 > Ethics > Flashcards

Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

What is ethics

A

The science of moral decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Moral theories

A

Virtue ethics
Duty ethics
Consequentialism (utilitarianism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Virtue ethics

A

Balance between the extremes (the mean)

Perception of ‘the good’ related to human flourishing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty ethics

A

Morality is a matter of adhering to fixed standards, of performing duties
Categorical imperative
People as ends, never just means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Categorical imperative

A

‘Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it become a universal law’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who founded virtue ethics

A

Aristotle (384-322 BCE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who founded duty ethics

A

Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consequentialism

A

Outcomes are what matter
Promote ‘greatest happiness for the greatest number’
No absolute prohibitions
Ends justify the mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who founded consequentialism

A

John Stuart Mill (1806 - 1873)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 principles of ethics

A

Autonomy
Non-maleficence
Beneficence
Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Autonomy

A

Self-rule: the capacity to make reasoned decisions and act on them; recognising patients as people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Non-maleficence

A

First do not harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Beneficence

A

Make the care of your patient your first concern)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Justice

A

Fairness, respect for rights)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hypothesis

A

Believed to be true subject to empirical falsification or verification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Value judgement

A

Held to be true but empirical evidence/ inference cannot establish truth or falsity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Origin of values

A

Thick concepts

Thin concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Thick concepts

A

Descriptive + normative

‘rude, kind, sympathetic, violent’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Thin concepts

A

Moral judgement over facts

‘good, bad, right, wrong’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When is an argument valid

A

If the premises are true then the conclusion MUST be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Does a valid argument need a true conclusion

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Truth preservation

A

From true premises to a true conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Fallacious reasoning

A
  1. A beautiful garden always includes a water feature
  2. My next-door neighbour’s garden has a water feature
    - Therefore my nest-door neighbour’s garden is beautiful

Premises are true but conc false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

GMC on values

A

Work in partnership w/ patients
Listen to, and respond to, their concerns and preferences
Give patients the info they want or need in a way they can understand
Respect patients’ right to reach decisions with you about the treatment and care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What do clinicians tend to significantly underestimate

A

Patient’s willingness to undergo toxic treatments to improve length/quality of life
Desire of patients to have full info even if they don’t act on it – or even believe it!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What does respect for autonomy in medicine entail

A

Providing accurate, truthful info
Facilitating informed consent
Maintaining confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Mill’s Harm Principles

A

“…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others …over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Why is confidentiality important

A

Pt’s interest in taking control of their life – incl decisions about who should access personal info
Implied promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Is autonomy and confidentiality absolute

A

No, may be overridden by other concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Confidentiality and duty

A

Duty based ethics:
Dr/ pt. relationship viewed as a contract
Confidentiality an implicit part of this contract
Breach of confidentiality involves the violation of terms of contract
Breach of confidentiality is a transgression against the integrity of the relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Important things to consider with confidentiality

A

Nature of ship

Some types of info deemed intrinsically personal, therefore implicitly confidential (social standards)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Motivations for sharing info

A

Malicious intent (incl gossip)
Benefit to an individual e.g pt, or their family
Benefitting someone else or the wider public

33
Q

Attributes of the virtuous medic

A 
Reliability 
Trustworthiness 
Professionalism 
Integrity 
Honestly 
Beneficence, non-maleficence
34
Q

Non-maleficence and confidentiality

A

Harm may result from divulging personal info
Loss of personal trust in that Dr
May spread to general distrust of medical profession – pt. may undermine trust of other pt.
Anger/ distress to pt.

35
Q

Sources of duty of confidentiality

A

English law recognises a breach of confidence. Derived from:
- Common law
- Statute: Human Rights Act 1998 – Article 8 v Article 10, Data Protection Act/ GDPR
GMC and DOH guidance
Terms of employment

36
Q

Common law and confidentiality cases

A

Hunter v Mann [1974]
AG v guardian Newspapers No2 [1990]
Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers [2004]

37
Q

Human Rights Act 1998 - Article 8

A
  1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life his home and his correspondence
  2. There shall be no interferences by a public authority with this right expect as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in the interest of national security, public safety …. For prevention of disorder or crime, for protection of health or morals
38
Q

When can you disclose confidential info

A 
Consent of the pt. (implied or expressed)
Another member of the healthcare team 
In the pt.’s best interest 
Required by law 
Legislation/ statute 
Court order/ court proceedings 
Public interest
W v Edgell [1990]
X v Y [1998]
39
Q

Disclosure in the public interest

A

Pt’s fitness to drive and reporting concerns to the DVLA or DVA
Reporting gunshot and knife wounds
Disclosing info about serious communicable diseases

40
Q

The police and public interest disclosures

A 
Dr’s can disclose info to police for detection or prevention of serious crime and in the interests of national security 
Serious crime (assault, robbery, murder)
Police must make a Section 29 request
41
Q

What does DOH say on disposing confidential info

A

Murder, manslaughter, rape, treason, kidnapping, child abuse or other cases where individuals have suffered serious harm may warrant breaching confidence
A knife attack may be sufficient to justify a public interest disclosure of confidential info even where consent is not given, where it likely to assist on the prevention and detections of a serious crime

42
Q

Achieving reflective equilibrium

A

Critical application of moral theories & principles
Identify conflicts
Recognise and question initial assumptions
Consider counterargument
Arrive at a conclusion supported by reasons

43
Q

Where are animals used in research

A

Universities and medical schools
Commercial organisations
Charities
Government (incl departments, NHS, public bodies, public health labs)

44
Q

What are animals used in research

A 
Creation and breeding of genetically modified animals (mainly mice)
Basic research (how it works)
Regulatory testing 
Research that translates animal-human 
Protection of natural environment 
Preservation of animal species
45
Q

Species used in biomedical research

A 
Mice 
Fish 
Rats 
Birds 
‘Specially protected’ species (cats, dogs, horses and primates)
46
Q

Moral question of using animals in research

A

Moral value of animals vs value of research + moral value of humans and human wellbeing
Does (potential) benefit to humans justify causing harm and suffering of non-human animals?

47
Q

Necessity argument for using animals in research

A

In-vitro or in-silico investigations simply cannot replicate the function of complex living systems

48
Q

Comparative moral value argument

A

Human wellbeing is paramount, and it is even less morally acceptable to experiment on humans

49
Q

Animal v human subjects for research

A

Paying research subjects risks selecting for the neediest, vulnerable groups (economic coercion)
Many do regard people as having more moral work than other animals
BUT should we trade lives, pain and suffering for human knowledge? However altruistic the aim?

50
Q

Principles put in place by Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board (AWERBS)

A

Replacement
Reduction
Refinement - bredding, accom and care, methods mand procedures used

51
Q

Factors for consideration for vivisection

A

How important is the possible result (cancer vs eczema)?
How likely is it
Possible benefit vs certain harm
Act certainty v omission possibility: animals will surely suffer by the act, human might suffer without the research

52
Q

What % of drugs shown dafe and effective in animal,als fail human trials

A

92%

53
Q

Tuskegee Syphilis experiment

A

1932 -1972, US
399 AA men w/ untreated syphilis monitored for 40 years
Told only that they would be getting free medical care
Not told of their dx – given placebos rather than treatment

54
Q

HeLa cell line

A

AA woman’s cancer cells grown in culture
An ‘immortal’ human cell line
Consent from her or her family never sought
Total mass of HeLa cells > 50 million tonnes
Still in use today

55
Q

Nazi experiments on prisoners

A

Nazis claimed not to see some people as fully human but still used for medical research
Denial of humanity Indifference to suffering
Some experimental results still in use today

56
Q

The Nuremberg Code

A

Ethical guidelines to ensure that medics never again participate in atrocities
Forerunner of ‘four pillars’ approach
Enshrines (first rule) voluntary consent of the subject
Not officially adopted in any jurisdiction

57
Q

Five “rules” of ethical (human) research

A

Not transferable to non-human subjects

  1. Obtain informed consent
  2. Minimise risk of harm to ppts
  3. Protect anonymity and confidentiality
  4. Be transparent to subjects (avoid deception)
  5. Respect ppt right to withdraw
58
Q

When did the UK lose their ‘Measles Free’ status

A

2019

59
Q

Cases and deaths of measles in 2018

A

353, 236 cases worldwide

Although most deaths have been in developing world, 72 children died in Europe

60
Q

Pro-compulsion - vaccines

A

Beneficence – good for the individual
Utilitarian – “herd immunity” (60-70%) leads to general reduction in suffering
Non maleficence – unvaccinated individuals are at risk of harm
Justice – compromising herd immunity by refusing to be vaccinated or to vaccinate one’s own child is not fair to others

61
Q

Con compulsion - vaccines

A

Autonomy – individuals right to choose or parent’ right to make treatment decisions for their children
Fear of “other kinds of harm”
Distrust of medical profession
Distrust of ‘big pharma’
Vehemence (sometime violent) of some anti-vaxxers

62
Q

Wakefield scandal

A

1998 – paper linking MMR vaccine with conditions incl autism published
2004 – co-authors withdraw support
2010 – Wakefield struck off
2010 – present: Wakefield stands by conclusions

63
Q

Public health v individual liberty - vaccination

A

Measles vaccination target for herd immunity 95% (WHO)
Threshold for COVID-19 not known (WHO)
Should the state override the pt.’s or parents’ decisions?
Is the state entitling to restrict individual liberties to protect the group?

64
Q

Hard problems of a parent - vaccination

A

Harm vs Benefit – will the vaccine benefit my child
Will it harm my child (e.g., MMR “controversy”)?
Knowledge vs belief – “do you know that the vaccine is safe?”
Individual vs population vs pt autonomy – “why should I put my child at risk for the sake of this ‘herd immunity’?”

65
Q

Autonomy and parental rights

A

Parenthood needs imply and absolute right to choose for children

66
Q

Questioning autonomy when it comes to vaccination

A

Can parents choose to risk harm to their own children
Is it morally permissible to override parental autonomy if their actions harm their children or others?
Is a failure to vaccinate a child ‘harm’ in the same category as abuse or neglect?
Consistency – should we override parents’ decisions about education? Or religion? Food?

67
Q

From a parent’s, what is risking possible harm by omission different from

A

Causing (albeit unlikely) harm by a +ve arc

68
Q

Trust and knowledge - vaccination

A

How can one prove that something is safe – or establish relative risk?
How do we know that journals, clinical trails are reliable - Wakefield
Do Dr’s always tell truth - Harold Shipman
Do policymakers always tell the truth?
Do doctors/ policymakers always know the truth?

69
Q

Vaccine ‘passports’

A

Certificate to permit access to some venues or transport etc
Refusal to admit those without a passport

70
Q

Issues with vaccine passports

A

Not everybody can be vaccinated
Might lead to some “collateral damage”
- Alienation from health services and professions
- Discrimination against groups or those refusing vaccination
- Some might feel compelled to get vaccinated

71
Q

Reasons for mandatory childhood vaccination

A

Herd immunity more important than individual freedom
Good for community
Good for individual child
Concerns against vaccines irrational/ ignorant

72
Q

Reasons against mandatory childhood vaccinations

A

Individual freedom is more important than herd immunity
Right not to vaccinate on a par with other civil liberties
Bad for child if there if there are real worries related to vaccines

73
Q

Who founded consequentialism ethics

A

John Stuart Mill

74
Q

When is an action right according to virtue ethics

A

If, and only if, it is what a virtuous agent would do in the circumstances

75
Q

When is an action right according to duty (deontological) ethics

A

If, and only if, it is in accord with a moral rule or principle

76
Q

When is an action right, according to consequentialism ethics

A

If, and only if, it promotes the best consequences

77
Q

Paternalism

A

A decision made for the sake of someone’s best interests, against their will

78
Q

Soft/ weak paternalism

A

Situations where a pr’s capacity and understanding of a situation are not known
E.g. in emergency situations

79
Q

Hard/ strong paternalism

A

A pt’s wishes are ignored even though they have relevant facts and capacity

MBBS - Year 1 (93 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions