Lecture 7: Building Intimacy Flashcards

1
Q

self-concept

A
  • What we know and believe about ourselves
  • “Who am I?”
  • Our attributes, abilities, values, and goals
  • Descriptive and evaluative components
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the looking glass self

A

Charles Horton Cooley: we develop our self-concept through interactions with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 steps of the looking glass self

A
  1. Imagine how we appear to others
  2. Interpret others’ reactions
  3. Develop & revise self-concept based on these perceptions & judgments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the active role of the individual

A
  • Not simply passively internalizing interactions with others
  • Individual plays an active part in selecting & interpreting perceived judgments & perceptions of others
  • Also attempts to manage others’ perceptions through self-presentation strategies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

symbolic interactionism

A
  • Our sense of sense is a social construction, developed & maintained via inferences from experiences with others
  • Sense of self is experienced in relation to some audience (real or imagined; specific or generalized)
  • Imagining reactions of others may be a conscious or non-conscious process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

private beliefs & imagined audiences study method

A
  • A study in two ostensibly unrelated parts
  • First part: visualization exercise: they were told to visualize either their last interaction with a close friend or an older family member
  • Second part: read and rate passages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

private beliefs & imagined audiences study findings

A
  • Participants who had previously thought about friends reported the erotic passage being more enjoyable, pleasurable, and exciting than those who had thought about older relatives
  • Private beliefs are tailored for public acceptance, although we may not be consciously aware of this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

self-esteem

A
  • Evaluative component of self-concept
  • How good or bad we feel about ourselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

trait level self-esteem

A
  • Enduring level of self-regard
  • Fairly stable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stable level self-esteem

A
  • Dynamic, changing feelings about the self
  • Vary from moment to moment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

sociometer theory

A

Self-esteem as a gauge to assess the degree of acceptance by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

self-esteem and acceptance

A

Trait self-esteem strongly correlates with perceptions of acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

individual and group decision making study

A
  • Exchange description of yourself with other group members, indicate which group members you want to work with
  • Then they were told they had to work alone either 1) because of random assignment or 2) because other group members did not choose them (rejection condition)
  • Rejected participants felt worse about themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intrapersonal view of self-esteem

A

private self-valuation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

example of the intrapersonal view of self-esteem

A

ratio of one’s success to one’s failures (James, 1890)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Interpersonal view of self-esteem

A

believing that one possesses ceratin attributes should only affect self-esteem to the extent that one considers these attributes to be judged positively or negatively by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

example of the interpersonal view of self-esteem

A

Cady trying to fit in with the plastics in Mean Girls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

interpersonal self-esteem correlational study method

A

Participants filled out global measures of self-esteem 2) rated themselves in 5 domains and 3) indicated how important those domains were for social approval or disapproval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

interpersonal self-esteem correlational study findings

A
  • Interaction between self-evaluations and the perceived approval value of the domain
  • How closely your performance in a given domain is tied to your self-esteem depends on how much you think people around you value that domain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

interpersonal self-esteem causational study method

A
  • Phase 1: what research ideas are you thinking about these days?
  • Phase 2: 2-ms exposure from a professor that was either approving or disapproving
  • Phase 3: how good is this idea? How important is it?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

interpersonal self-esteem causational study findings

A
  • When primed with the approving face, students felt really good about their reserach
  • When primed with the disapproving face, they felt much worse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

self-concepts and relationships

A

As we grow closer to a relationship partner, our self-concept expands to incorporate aspects of the other

23
Q

self-expansion model

A
  • People are motivated to expand their potential efficacy
  • Accrue resources, knowledge, perspectives, abilities, identities, etc. that make it possible to achieve future goals
24
Q

self-expansion model in relationships

A
  • One means to expand one’s efficacy is through close relationships
  • In a close relationship, we incorporate our partner’s identities, perspectives, skills, and resources in the self
25
Q

falling in love study

A
  • Students provided assessments of their sense of self: self-esteem, self-efficacy & spontaneous self-concept every 2 weeks over a 10 week period
  • They asked participants which significant life events they had experienced
  • Those who had fallen in love experienced greater increase in self-concept compared to before falling love & participants who did not fall in love
  • Also increases in self-esteem and self-efficacy
26
Q

cognitive confusion of the self & others

A

Evidence that individuals cognitively confuse the self & close others

27
Q

cognitive confusion of the self & others study method

A
  • Phase 1: how well does this trait describe you, a partner, or a stranger
  • Phase 2: researchers asked participants “for which target was this word presented?”
28
Q

cognitive confusion of the self & others study findings

A

-There was more confusing between the self and close other
- This was not explainable by familiarity or similarity: closeness appears to be the key ingredient

29
Q

what do we include in self-expansion model?

A
  • Resources: knowledge, material, and social assets
  • Identity: their traits become seen as your traits
  • Perspectives: seeing the world from a different point
30
Q

falling in love as a process of self-expansion

A
  • Movement toward desired goal is associated with positive affect
  • The velocity with which we approach a desired goal is an important predictor of positive affect
  • Self-expansion is very rapid in the early stages of the relationship
  • It gives rise to a sense of exhilaration
  • This may be the sensation of falling in love
31
Q

upward spiral of self-expansion

A
  • Relationship between self-expansion & positive affect may be reciprocal
  • Self-expansion fuels positive affect
  • Positive affect, in turn, broadens our understanding of the world
  • Fosters curiosity & interest, desire for novelty, increased tendency to approach & engage with the world
32
Q

longitudinal roommate task

A

positive affect predicts more complex understanding of roommate and greater perception of the self-other overlap

33
Q

self-expansion over time

A

The rate of self-expansion slows over time

34
Q

self-expansion and infidelity

A
  • In monogamous relationship, we may begin to look outside the relationship if the need for self-expansion is not being met
  • Potential for future self-expansion negatively predicts susceptibility to infidelity
35
Q

self-disclosure

A

sharing personal information about teh self

36
Q

self-disclosure and intimacy

A

self-disclosure is central to the development of intimacy

37
Q

self-disclosure and liking

A
  • We tend to like those who share personal information with us
  • We also tend to like people better after disclosing personal information to them
38
Q

self-disclosure task method

A
  • Lab-based task for creating feelings of closeness
  • Reciprocal exchange
  • 3 x 12 questions gradually escalating in intimacy within and across sets
39
Q

self-disclosure task findings

A
  • Greater feelings of closeness with a partner following the disclosure task (relative to the small-talk control)
  • Does not matter if the dyad was mismatched on important attitudes, participants expected to like each other, or getting close was an explicit goal
    -There was no difference between all-women and all-men pairs
40
Q

social penetration theory

A
  • we gradually move from exchanging superficial information to more intimate information over time
  • Breadth and depth of topics both increase, but breadth increases more quickly
  • We balance our desire for expansion & connection with the desire to feel safe (approach & avoidance movies)
41
Q

risks of self-disclosure

A
  • Evaluation: could be judged negatively
  • Maintenance: could disrupt the relationship
  • Defence: information could be used against you
  • Communication problems: could be difficult to talk about
42
Q

responsiveness

A

The degree to which:
- You believe that your partner understands your situation, emotions, needs, and opinions
- You believe that your partner values, respects, and validates yourself
- You believe that your partner acts in ways that care for and support the self

43
Q

responsiveness and intimacy

A

resposiveness is a key aspect of the development of intimacy

44
Q

intimacy process model

A
  • a’s disclosure -> b’s responses -? a’s reaction to b’s responses
  • each step is influenced by the interpreter’s interpretive filter and their motives, needs, goals, and fears
45
Q

support for the intimacy process model

A
  • Event-contingent recording (type of experience sampling) studies (1 or 2 weeks)
  • Provide information immediately after social interaction
  • Perceptions of the dating partner’s responsiveness mediated the effect of personal disclosures and the experience of intimacy
  • Disclosure on its own may not be sufficient for the development of intimacy
46
Q

the self and relationships as reciprocal influences

A
  • The self is not the simple result of experiences with others; it also plays an important role in shaping experiences
  • Iterative, reciprocal process
  • We choose what part of the self-concept to display
47
Q

2 motives that drive how we want to be seen

A

self-enhancement and self-verification

48
Q

self-enhancement

A
  • Drive to be seen positively
  • Satisfied partners perceive partners more positively than objectively warranted, turn faults into virtues
49
Q

self-verification

A

drive to maintain a coherent self-view (wanting to be known)

50
Q

reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification

A
  • We may value partners that combine global adoration and specific accuracy
  • We may prefer enhancement on critically important qualities (ex. attractiveness) but verification for less critically important qualities
  • We may also wish for our partners to understand how we see ourselves without necessarily weaning them to agree
51
Q

relatedness vs autonomy

A
  • As many as 57% of dating undergraduates report feeling too close to their partners (their desired level of closeness is lower than their actual level of closeness)
  • They describe the experience as suffocating, smothering, and overwhelming
  • The Common theme that causes these feelings: a real or perceived threat to personal control
  • Constrains one’s ability to expand in domains external to the relationship
  • Over-expansion may lead to a sense of exhaustion
52
Q

autonomy

A

feeling that one’s actions are entirely freely chosen and not coerced

53
Q

benefits of autonomy

A
  • Autonomy is associated with more openness and greater well-being
  • It predicts more constructive and less defensive responses to conflict and more satisfaction even after conflict
  • Partner’s autonomy also predicts the actor’s satisfaction & decreased defensiveness
  • Autonomy is linked to more effective support provision in close relationships
54
Q

reconciling relatedness and autonomy

A

In successful relationships, we need to balance both relatedness & autonomy needs