Lecture 25: The Neurobiology of Love & Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

neurobiological view of attachment

A
  • There is no single attachment system dedicated exclusively to the formation of social bonds
  • Rather, a set of more general purpose affective-emotional systems for which attachments emerge with learning
    (ex. Separation distress, Felt security and social pleasure, Motivation to seek out & engage with close others)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Affective neuroscience

A

a branch of neuroscience focused on understanding emotions in humans & other mammals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Emotions

A

complex psychological states involving physiological changes, subjective experience, and behaviours/expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Affect

A

the subjective experience of emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key assumptions of affective neuroscience

A
  1. Emotions & associated feelings evolved to serve specific purposes in relation to biologically significant and life-challenging situations
  2. Felt aspects of emotional systems (affects) serve 3 key adaptive purposes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

3 adaptive purposes of pheromones

A
  • Highlight survival & reproductive issues in the environment
  • Motivate behaviour for survival & reproduction
  • Aid in memory construction through reinforcement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

current neurobiological research

A
  • Much of the research pertains to animals
  • May not generalize perfectly to humans
  • Ex. humans appear to lack dedicated neural machinery for detecting pheromones
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

social pain

A
  • Distress we experience when important social ties are threatened or lost
  • Often, we use physical pain words to describe such experiences
  • This tendency is cross-cultural
  • The propensity to feel social pain may be rooted in separation distress children experience when separated from the caregiver; generalized to maintaining other social relationships given the benefits of group living
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evolution of social pain

A
  • May have evolved from general pain mechanisms
  • Pain serves an important adaptive purpose: it captures our attention & demands action
  • Individuals with congenital insensitivity to pain are highly susceptible to physical injury have reduced life spans (often die in childhood)
  • For highly vulnerable infants, being left alone is a life-or-death situation
  • Experiences of social pain motivate behaviour to re-establish proximity with caregiver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

two components of pain

A
  1. sensory component
  2. affective/motivational components
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

sensory component of pain

A
  • Specific information about what’s happening
  • What, where, how intense is it?
  • Involves the somatosensory cortex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

affective/motivational component of pain

A
  • The aversiveness of the experience & motivation to stop it
  • The alarm component
  • Involves a different set of neural regions (ex. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) anterior insula (AI))
  • Activation in some areas (ex. dACC) may trigger physiological stress response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

social pain in the brain

A
  • Increased activation in the affective pain regions (ex. dACC, AI) during various kinds of social pain experiences, like
    1. Reminders of deceased for bereaved individuals
    2. Reminders of ex-partners for those who had been recently dumped
    3. Social exclusion: Strength of the activation is correlated with feelings of rejection/exclusion
  • Interestingly, some studies have observed activation in the somatosensory cortex as well
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

interoception

A
  • Ability to perceive signals originating within the body
  • Ex. breathing, hunger, thirst
  • Crucial for being able to maintain a steady internal state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

insula

A
  • Plays a key role in processing these signals & imbuing them with emotional & motivational significance
  • Ex. may interpret signals of sympathetic nervous system activation as anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

types of mechanoreceptors in the skin

A

fast-conducting & slow-conducting mechanoreceptors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

fast-conducting mechanoreceptors

A

allow for fine discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

slow-conducting mechanoreceptors

A
  • Respond to low-pressure, low-velocity tactile stimulation (ex. Slow and light stroking)
  • This type of stimulation is typically found in intimate affiliative interactions and is experienced as subjectively pleasant
  • Signal travels directly to the insula (may serve an all-clear signal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

felt security

A
  • Once contact with caregiver is regained, experience strong feelings of pleasure & comfort
  • Reinforces the attachment bond
  • In adulthood, symbolic proximity-seeking may be sufficient to restore the sense of comfort & security
  • Some parallels to the literature on physical pain & placebos: cognitive factors like mere expectation of pain relief can alleviate pain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

pain relief as a reward

A
  • Relief from pain (i.e. omission/reduction of an aversive event/punishment) is more than simply an attenuation of pain; it is rewarding & pleasurable
  • Pleasure of relief is derived from the violation of negative expectancy
  • `Pessimists (who generally hold more negative expectations) experience greater dread of adverse event & greater relief when the adverse event is avoided
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

endogenous opioid system

A

system of opioid receptors & their respective ligands (chemical messengers that bind to a receptor)

22
Q

μ-opioid receptors

A
  • Bind drugs like morphine & heroin, mediate their analgesic & rewarding effects
  • Normally bind internally produced (endogenous) chemical messengers like β-endorphin
  • Play an important role in pain relief, placebo effects, hedonic responses to rewards like food
23
Q

Brain opioid theory of social attachment (BOTSA)

A
  • Opioids mediate attachment through dual mechanisms
  • Declining levels of opioids during separation contribute to social pain/separation distress
  • Increasing levels of opioids during reunion contribute to feelings of reward & comfort
24
Q

receptor agonist

A

chemical substance that binds to & activates a certain receptor

25
Q

receptor antagonist

A
  • Chemical substance that binds to & blocks a certain receptor, thereby blocking or dampening normal biological responses
  • Seeing how typical behavioural responses change after the administration of an antagonist allows us to infer the neurochemical mechanisms behind the typical response
  • Naloxone & naltrexone are common opioid receptor antagonists
26
Q

BOTSA Hypothesis 1

A

if separation distress reflects state of endogenous opioid withdrawal, stimulation of opioid activity should diminish behavioural manifestations of separation distress (e.g., distress vocalizations (DVs), clinging)

27
Q

pharmacological approach to BOTSA hypothesis 1

A

activation of μ-opioid receptor agonists like morphine or β-endorphin reduce DVs & proximity-seeking behaviour like clinging in variety of non-human animals species

28
Q

brain-stimulation approach to BOTSA Hypothesis 1

A
  • Electric stimulation of the periventricular gray (PVG) produces the release of β-endorphin, physical analgesia, and the reduction of DVs in isolated guinea pigs.
  • Both analgesia & education in DVs can be reverse with the administration of an opioid receptor antagonist (naloxone)
29
Q

BOTSA hypothesis 2a

A

social contact leads to the release of endogenous opioids

30
Q

evidence for BOTSA hypothesis 2a

A

Large increases in cerebrospinal fluid concentration of β-endorphin following grooming in monkeys

31
Q

BOTSA hypothesis 2b

A

If this release of endogenous opioids mediates (drives) the comforting effects of social contact, should be able to block the comforting effects of social contact by blocking endogenous opioids

32
Q

evidence for BOTSA Hypothesis 2b

A

Young animals treated with opioid receptor antagonists like naltrexone continue to cry & cling to mom even after reunion

33
Q

further BOTSA animal evidence

A
  • Further evidence that opioids mediate the formation of attachment bonds
  • Genetic knock-down of the μ-opioid receptor in mouse pups causes deficits in attachment
  • Oprm - - pups emit fewer separation distress calls relative to wild-type controls (oprm + +)
  • Do not develop preference for the mother’s olfactory cues (in contrast to wild-type controls)
  • Attachment & separation distress go hand-in-hand: the pain of separation is the price we pay for attachment
34
Q

indirect evidence for BOTSA in human research

A
  • Social contact decreases physical pain in real-life (e.g., heel lance in infants, labour) and experimental settings
  • Even viewing picture of a loved one decreases pain during lab task
  • However, not clear if this is opioid-mediated
35
Q

imaging evidence for BOTSA in human research

A

When thinking of an experience of social loss, deactivation of opioid neurotransmission in regions to pain affect

36
Q

pharmacological evidence for BOTSA in human research

A
  • Naltrexone (vs. placebo control) decreases feelings of warmth & connection participants experience while reading affectionate notes from close others or looking at their photographs. Also decrease activity in the left ventral striatum (reward-related region of the brain) while looking at pictures of close others
  • Participants received naltrexone or placebo before completing a self-disclosure task. There was no effect on feelings of closeness toward partner, but blocked the increases in positive affect and self-esteem that placebo participants experienced after the task. This suggests that opioids may contribute to positive feelings we experience in different kinds of affiliative situations
37
Q

OPRM1 A118G

A

linked to variation in both physical pain sensitivity & rejection sensitivity (the G allele being the sensitive variant)

38
Q

genetic evidence for BOTSA in human research

A
  • Couples filled out a questionnaire after each interaction they had over a period of 3 weeks
  • Found that individuals carrying at least 1 copy of the G allele reported steeper declines in felt security when their partner behaved more coldly or hurtfully towards them than usual
39
Q

implications of opioid research

A

Opioid drugs may be a substitute for unmet belonging needs

40
Q

oxytocin

A
  • A neurochemical messenger that plays a key role in parturition & lactation, is released during copulation
  • Also postulated to play an important role in social behaviour & bonding
  • Has received more research attention (in humans) than opioids, but their precise function still remains unclear
41
Q

oxytocin research in animals

A
  • Early evidence indicating that oxytocin may play a role in social bonding came from the comparison of two closely related species with very different social structures
  • Prairie voles: typically form pair bonds after mating, exhibit biparental care
  • Montane voles: live in isolation, no evidence of pair bonding
  • Different responses to separation in infancy: prairie voles respond with DVs and stress hormone secretion; montane voles do not exhibit behavioural/physiological reaction
  • Prairie voles have high density of oxytocin receptors in regions related to reward & reinforcement (nucleus accumbens), whereas montone voles have few receptors in these areas
  • Can facilitate partner bonding in prairie voles by injecting exogenous oxytocin (even if the voles have not mated)
  • Oxytocin receptor antagonist blocks partner preference formation following matin in prairie vole
42
Q

initial oxytocin research in humans

A
  • First study to examine social effects of oxytocin in humans found that intranasal oxytocin increases trust during an economic trust game
  • A subsequent flurry of research found many prosocial effects:
    emotional recognition & empathy, generosity & cooperation, more positive communication behaviours during couple conflict discussions, increases in social motivation
43
Q

subsequent oxytocin research in humans

A
  • As research accumulated, it became clear that the effects of oxytocin are not always consistent
  • Some studies found no effects, very small effects, or negative/antisocial effects
  • Ex. oxytocin actually decreases trust towards out-group members ad those with clinically high levels of rejection sensitivity (borderline personality disorder)
  • Effects of oxytocin may depend on interpersonal & intrapersonal context
44
Q

Social salience hypothesis

A

oxytocin may focus attention on social cues

45
Q

evidence for the social salience hypothesis

A
  • Oxytocin has been found to increase gaze to the eye region & lead to changes in functional connectivity among brain regions indicative of the heightened attention
  • In mice, oxytocin enables maternal care behaviour (pup retrieval) by fine-tuning neurons in the auditory cortex so pup distress calls become more salient
46
Q

psychological/behavioural effects of increased social salience

A
  • Psychological/behavioural effects of increased social salience will depend on contextual factors
  • Might magnify prosociality when dealing with close or trusted others
  • But, diminish prosociality when the situation or the individual’s disposition biases them to construe social information negatively
  • Ex. oxytocin administration makes individuals low in attachment anxiety remember their mom as more caring & close; opposite effect for individuals high in attachment anxiety
47
Q

fMRI passion study

A
  • fMRI study of early-stage intense romantic love (dating 7 months on average)
  • While in the scanner, they viewed photos of a loved and familiar acquaintance
  • Activation of the ventral tegmental area and related regions that receive projections from this area
  • Part of the dopamine reward pathway
  • Note: fMRI does not allow for measuring activity of a specific neurotransmitter, but other research has found increased dopamine release in these regions in response to rewards like money
48
Q

replicating fMRI passion study

A
  • Finding since replicated cross-culturally and with same-sex couples
  • Also replicated in long-term marriages who reported being still “madly in love” with their spouses
  • Replicated using stronger control condition (close, long-term friend)
  • Activity in the VTA correlates with feelings of passionate love
  • But, not with scores on friendship-based love scale
49
Q

dopamine

A
  • Commonly described as a “reward neurochemistry”
  • Contributes to the incentive/motivation to pursue rewards
    (wanting vs. liking distinction)
  • Unlike opioids, does not appear to mediate the pleasure of sensation
  • At the affective level, this may be experienced as anticipatory exhilaration, eagerness, and euphoria
  • Allows animals to pursue various rewards important for survival
  • Responds to incentives in the environment and imbalances in homeostatic needs
  • May contribute to the experience of passionate, romantic love; but likely also plays a role in attachment figures and care behaviour
50
Q

case of Leonard L

A
  • Childhood encephalitis led to a destruction of dopamine brain circuits
  • After being treated with L-DOPA (precursor of dopamine), able to experience a sense of engagement with the world, energy, and excitement