Chapter 2: Research Methods in Relationship Science Flashcards

1
Q

the short history of relationship science

A
  • Relationship science began in the 1930s, with studies of children’s friendships, courtship, and marriage
  • An explosion of studies put the field on the map in the 1960s and 70s
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

relationship science today

A
  • Often uses diverse samples of people
  • Examines varied types of family, friendship, and romantic relationships
  • Studies both the pleasant and unpleasant aspects of relationships
  • Often follows relationships in their natural setting
  • Uses sophisticated technology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

developing a research question

A

The first step in any scientific endeavour is to ask a question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

relationship questions can come from:

A
  • Personal experience
  • Social problems
  • Previous relationships
  • Suggestions from theories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

two broad types of research questions

A
  1. Describe events
  2. Establish causal connections between them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

convenience sample

A

using anyone who is readily available and who consents to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

representative sample

A

strives to ensure that collectively, participants resemble the entire population of people of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what types of samples are best?

A

Representative samples are better than convenience samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

where is most research conducted?

A

in WEIRD samples (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

are studies with convenience samples still important?

A

yes, even small studies using convenience samples can make important contributions to relationship science! no study is perfect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

volunteer bias

A

of the people invited to participate, those who do may differ from those who don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

correlations

A

describe patterns in which change in one event is accompanied to some degree by change in another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

positive correlation

A

as the independent variable increases, so does the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

negative correlation

A

as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a correlation could mean:

A
  1. X causes y
  2. Y causes x
  3. A third variable may explain the relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

experiments

A
  • Provide straightforward information about causes and their effects
  • Can determine causal connections
17
Q

self-reports

A

asking people to report on their experiences

18
Q

pros of self-reports

A
  • Allow us to get inside people’s heads
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to obtain
19
Q

cons of self-reports

A
  • Involve interpretation of questions
  • Difficulties in recall or awareness
  • Bias in participants’ reports
20
Q

social desirability bias

A

participants’ reluctance to tell researchers anything that makes them look bad or portrays them in an undesirable light

21
Q

observations

A

Researchers can collect information about relationships by observing behaviour directly

22
Q

how are observations conducted?

A
  • Measuring behaviour with sophisticated tools
  • Carefully training colleagues to make observations that are accurate, reliable, and detailed
23
Q

ecological momentary assessment

A

uses intermittent, short periods of observation to capture samples of behaviour

24
Q

pro of observations

A

Avoid the challenges of self-reports

25
Q

cons of observations

A
  • Don’t allow us to understand people’s perceptions of their experiences
  • Expensive
  • Time-consuming
  • Reactivity
26
Q

reactivity

A

people may change their behaviour when they know they’re being observed

27
Q

physiological measures

A
  • Observing behaviour that people cannot consciously control
  • Assessed responses such as heart rate, muscle tension, genital arousal, brain activity, and hormone levels to determine how our physical states are associated with our social behaviour
28
Q

archival materials

A

Using stores of data collected by others

29
Q

pro of archival material

A

nonreactive

30
Q

con of archival material

A

limited to the data that already exists

31
Q

research ethics

A
  • Researchers inquiries may alert people to relationship problems or frustrations that they didn’t know they had
  • Relationship scientists are ordinarily very careful to safeguard the welfare of their participants
  • It’s important to continue studies in relationship science because we can gain knowledge that will benefit humanity
32
Q

how do researchers safeguard the welfare of their participants?

A
  • They provide detailed information so that they can decide whether or not to participate
  • They ask for informed consent
  • They provide prompt feedback that explains any experimental manipulations
  • They conduct final decisions
  • They may provide information about couple’s counselling, and sometimes, free psychological services
33
Q

interpreting and integrating results

A

We conduct statistical analyses to determine whether the results are statistically significant

34
Q

open science

A

research materials and data are shared with other scientists who wish to replicate one’s work

35
Q

Challenges and complexities of relationship data

A
  • paired interdependent data
  • three sources of influence
36
Q

paired interdependent data

A

most statistical procedures assume scores are independent of each other, but responses obtained from relationship partners are often interdependent, so special statistical procedures are needed

37
Q

three sources of influence

A

relationships are influenced by two individual partners and their idiosyncratic relationship, which requires sophisticated statistical analyses

38
Q

meta-analyses

A

studies that statistically combine the results from several prior studies

39
Q

should we proceed with scientific caution?

A

Scientific caution is appropriate but it shouldn’t be mistaken for weakness