Chapter 2: Research Methods in Relationship Science Flashcards

1
Q

the short history of relationship science

A
  • Relationship science began in the 1930s, with studies of children’s friendships, courtship, and marriage
  • An explosion of studies put the field on the map in the 1960s and 70s
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

relationship science today

A
  • Often uses diverse samples of people
  • Examines varied types of family, friendship, and romantic relationships
  • Studies both the pleasant and unpleasant aspects of relationships
  • Often follows relationships in their natural setting
  • Uses sophisticated technology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

developing a research question

A

The first step in any scientific endeavour is to ask a question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

relationship questions can come from:

A
  • Personal experience
  • Social problems
  • Previous relationships
  • Suggestions from theories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

two broad types of research questions

A
  1. Describe events
  2. Establish causal connections between them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

convenience sample

A

using anyone who is readily available and who consents to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

representative sample

A

strives to ensure that collectively, participants resemble the entire population of people of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what types of samples are best?

A

Representative samples are better than convenience samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

where is most research conducted?

A

in WEIRD samples (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

are studies with convenience samples still important?

A

yes, even small studies using convenience samples can make important contributions to relationship science! no study is perfect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

volunteer bias

A

of the people invited to participate, those who do may differ from those who don’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

correlations

A

describe patterns in which change in one event is accompanied to some degree by change in another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

positive correlation

A

as the independent variable increases, so does the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

negative correlation

A

as the independent variable increases, the dependent variable decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a correlation could mean:

A
  1. X causes y
  2. Y causes x
  3. A third variable may explain the relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

experiments

A
  • Provide straightforward information about causes and their effects
  • Can determine causal connections
17
Q

self-reports

A

asking people to report on their experiences

18
Q

pros of self-reports

A
  • Allow us to get inside people’s heads
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to obtain
19
Q

cons of self-reports

A
  • Involve interpretation of questions
  • Difficulties in recall or awareness
  • Bias in participants’ reports
20
Q

social desirability bias

A

participants’ reluctance to tell researchers anything that makes them look bad or portrays them in an undesirable light

21
Q

observations

A

Researchers can collect information about relationships by observing behaviour directly

22
Q

how are observations conducted?

A
  • Measuring behaviour with sophisticated tools
  • Carefully training colleagues to make observations that are accurate, reliable, and detailed
23
Q

ecological momentary assessment

A

uses intermittent, short periods of observation to capture samples of behaviour

24
Q

pro of observations

A

Avoid the challenges of self-reports

25
cons of observations
- Don’t allow us to understand people’s perceptions of their experiences - Expensive - Time-consuming - Reactivity
26
reactivity
people may change their behaviour when they know they’re being observed
27
physiological measures
- Observing behaviour that people cannot consciously control - Assessed responses such as heart rate, muscle tension, genital arousal, brain activity, and hormone levels to determine how our physical states are associated with our social behaviour
28
archival materials
Using stores of data collected by others
29
pro of archival material
nonreactive
30
con of archival material
limited to the data that already exists
31
research ethics
- Researchers inquiries may alert people to relationship problems or frustrations that they didn’t know they had - Relationship scientists are ordinarily very careful to safeguard the welfare of their participants - It’s important to continue studies in relationship science because we can gain knowledge that will benefit humanity
32
how do researchers safeguard the welfare of their participants?
- They provide detailed information so that they can decide whether or not to participate - They ask for informed consent - They provide prompt feedback that explains any experimental manipulations - They conduct final decisions - They may provide information about couple’s counselling, and sometimes, free psychological services
33
interpreting and integrating results
We conduct statistical analyses to determine whether the results are statistically significant
34
open science
research materials and data are shared with other scientists who wish to replicate one’s work
35
Challenges and complexities of relationship data
- paired interdependent data - three sources of influence
36
paired interdependent data
most statistical procedures assume scores are independent of each other, but responses obtained from relationship partners are often interdependent, so special statistical procedures are needed
37
three sources of influence
relationships are influenced by two individual partners and their idiosyncratic relationship, which requires sophisticated statistical analyses
38
meta-analyses
studies that statistically combine the results from several prior studies
39
should we proceed with scientific caution?
Scientific caution is appropriate but it shouldn’t be mistaken for weakness