Chapter 13: Dissolution and Loss Flashcards
the prevalence of divorce and marriage in the US today
- The divorce rate in the US is around 50%
- The length of the average marriage in the US is 18 years
- Only 46% of adult women in the US are presently married
- 23% of American children now live in single-parent homes
the prevalence of divorce over time
There was a large increase in the rate of divorce in the second half of the 20th century
Potential reasons for the increasing divorce rate
- We expect more of marriage, holding it to higher standards
- Working women have more financial freedom and better access to attractive alternatives, and they experience more corrosive conflict between work and family
- Creeping individualism and social mobility leave us less tied to, and less affected by, community norms that might discourage divorce
- New laws have made divorce more socially acceptable and easier to obtain
- Casual cohabitation weakens commitment to marriage
- Children of divorce are more likely to divorce when they become adults
- More of us have friends who are divorced
Levinger’s barrier model
Argues that three elements influence the breakup of relationships
3 elements of Levinger’s barrier model
- Attraction: enhanced by the rewards of a relationship offers and is diminished by its cost
- Alternates: any alternative to a current relationship
- Barriers: factors that make it hard to leave a relationship
key contributions of Levinger’s barrier model
- Highlights the fact that unhappy partners who would like to break up may stay together because it would cost them too much to leave
- Points out that many barriers to divorce are psychological
Karney and Bradbury’s vulnerability-stress-adaptation model
Highlights three factors that can contribute to divorce
3 elements of Karney and Bradbury’s vulnerability-stress-adaptation model
- Enduring vulnerabilities: increase one’s risk of divorce. Include one’s inborn traits and past experiences.
- Adaptive processes: processes with which people respond to stress
- Stressful events: require partners to provide support to one another and adjust to new circumstances
stress spillover
bringing surly moods home and interacting irascibly with our innocent partners
Processes of Adaptation in Intimate Relationships (PAIR) Project
kept track of 168 couples who married in 1981 and focused on the manner in which spouses adapted to their lives together
findings of the PAIR project
after 13 years, 35% of couples had divorced, 20% weren’t happy, and 45% were happily married
3 possible explanations for the PAIR project findings
- enduring dynamics model
- emergent distress model
- disillusionment model
enduring dynamics model
suggests that spouses bring to their marriages problems, incompatibilities, and enduring vulnerabilities that surface during their courtship
interventions for enduring dynamics model
keeping ambivalent couples from ever marrying
emergent distress model
suggests that problematic behaviour that ultimately destroys a couple begins after they marry
interventions for emergent distress model
encourage spouses to remain cheerful, generous, attentive, and kind
disillusionment model
suggests that as time goes by, spouses stop working as hard to be charming and the romance fades
interventions for the disillusionment model
maintain dispassionate and accurate perceptions of one’s lover
which models did the PAIR project support?
- The PAIR project found that the enduring dynamics and the disillusionment model, but not the emergent distress model predicted divorce
- Couples whose marriages were short-lived began their marriages with less love and those who divorced after longer periods were especially affectionate
- This is consistent with the disillusionment model (they had further to fall)
Two main conclusions from the PAIR project
- The size and speed of changes in romance best predict which couples will divorce
- The problems couples bring into their marriage determine how quickly a divorce will occur
Early Years of Marriage (EYM) Project
followed Black and white couples in Detroit to determine how the social conditions they experience affect their marital outcomes
EYM project findings
Found that Black couples were more prone to divorce
Potential reasons for higher divorce rate in Black couples
- Black couples had cohabitated for a longer period
- They were more likely to have had children before getting married
- They had lower incomes
- They were more likely to have come from broken homes
Three broad influences on marital outcomes
Cultural context
Personal contexts
Relational context