Education: Topic 6- Education policy and inequality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Education policy in Britain before 1988

What as education like in Britain before 1988?

A
  • Before, there were no state schools, and it was only available for those who could pay, though churches and charities did offer some for the poor.
  • Industrialisation increased need for education, resulting in compulsory education for 5 to 13 in 1880
  • M/C were given education preparing them for profession careers
  • W/C were given basic learning for factory work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Education policy in Britain before 1988

Explain the tripartite system.

A
  • This allowed the selection of pupils, based on aptitudes and abilities through 11+ exams
  • Introduced Grammar schools (M/C), Secondary modern schools (W/C), technical schools
  • Rather than promoting meritocracy, it reproduced class inequality as each school has unequal opportunities
  • Produced gender inequality, requiring girls to gain higher marks than boys to enter schools.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Education policy in Britain before 1988

Explain comprehensive schools

A
  • Introduced to overcome class division from the tripartite system
  • 11+ exams were abolished along with grammar & secondary moderns, replaced with comprehensive schools
  • But schools being replaced was up to the local education authority to decide and not all did
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Education policy in Britain before 1988

What are marxists view on the role of comprehensives?

A
  • They reproduce inequality from one generation to the next through streaming and labelling
  • The ‘myth of meritocracy’ legitimises class inequality by making unequal achievement seem fair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Education policy in Britain before 1988

What are functionalists view on the role of comprehensives?

A
  • Sees it as fulfilling essential functions like social integration by bringing children with different background together but there was still streaming
  • It brings meritocracy giving pupils a longer time to develop and show their abilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marketisation

What were the 2 points that created an ‘education market’?

A

Marketisation introduced consumer choice and competition resulting in an education market by:
* Reducing direct state control
* Increase school competition and parental choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Marketisation

What does David argue about parentocracy?

A

The idea that parents are in charge of the education system. This encourages diversity among schools, gives parents more choice and raises standards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Marketisation: Parentocracy

What policies promote marketisation?

A
  • League tables and Ofsted inspections
  • Business sponserships
  • Open enrollment
  • Specialist schools
  • Formula funding
  • Schools opting out of local authority control
  • Competing for pupils
  • Tutition fees for higher education
  • Parents can set up free schools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Marketisation: The reproducion of inequality

How does Ball and Whitty criticise marketisation?

A

Policies such as exam league tables and formula funding reproduces class inequalities by creating inequaliies between schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marketisation: League tables and cream-skimming

How does league tables encourage cream-skimming and silt-shifting?

A

Publishing league tables ensures schools achieve good results are in more demand and attract pupils. This encourages:
* Cream-skimming: ‘Good’ schools are selective and recruit M/C pupils
* Silt-shifting: ‘Good’ schools avoid taking less able pupils to reduce damages on league table

This produces unequal schools and social class inequalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Marketisation: The funding formula

Explain formula funding

A
  • Popular schools get more funds as they have more pupils, so they can afford better-qualified teachers and better facilities
  • Unpopular schools lose income and find it difficult to match teachers skills and facilities of their rivals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Marketisation

Explain the study of parental choice by Gerwitz

A

Study 14 london school. He found that differences in parents economic and cultural capital leading to class differences. He found 3 parent types:
* Priviliged skilled choosers: M/C, use economic, cultural capital to gain education capital for children
* Disconnected-local chooser: W/C, Choices are restricted ny their lack of economic, cultural capital
* Semi-skilled chooser: W/C who are ambitious but lack cultural capital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Markertisation: A03

What does Ball argue about the myth of parentocracy?

A
  • It makes it appear that all parents have the same freedom to choose which school to send their child too
  • M/C have a higher advantage
  • This reproduces class inequality and makes it appear inevitable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Marketisation: New labour and inequality

What policies did the new labour government 1997-2010 introduce to reduce inequality?

A
  • Designated depreived areas as education action zones, providing them resources
  • Aim higher to raise aspirations of groups who are under-represented
  • Education Maintenance Allowance (EMAs): Payments to students with low income backgrounds to encourage them to stay in school after 16
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

What happened to the education system from 2010-2015 by the conservative government?

A

The gov accelerated the move away from an education system based on comprehensive schools.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

Explain acadamies?

A

From 2010 all schools were encourged to become acadamies. By 2021-78% schools became academies
They can decide:
* Curriculum
* Term dates
* School hours
* Budget

17
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

Explain free schools

A

Schools are set up and run by parents, teachers, faith organisations, or business’. They can improve standards by taking control from the state and to themselves.
They can:
* Set own pay
* Change school length
* Dont follow national curriculum

18
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

What does Allen argue about free schools?

A

Argues that research from Sweden, with 20% free schools, shows that only M/C children benefited.

19
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

What does Ball argue about fragmented centralisation?

A

He argues that promoting academies and free schools has led to an increase in fragmentation and increased centralisation of control over education

  • Fragmentation: Comprehensive system replaced by patchwork of diverse providers, involving private providers, leading to inequality in opportunities
  • Centralisation of control: Central gov alone has the power to allow schools to become free or academies, funded by gov, there growth has reduced authorities in education
20
Q

Conservative government influence from 2010

What are some policies to reduce inequality?

A
  • Free school meals: For all children in reception, yr1, yr2
  • The pupil premium: Money schools recieves for each disadvantaged pupils
21
Q

Privatisation in education

What is the privatisation of education?

A
  • The transfer of public assets like schools to private companies.
  • Education has become a source of profit for capitalists, Ball calls education service industry (ESI)
  • Companies in the ESI are involved in building schools, providing supply teachers, work-based learning, careers advice, Ofsted inspection services
22
Q

Privatisation in education

What does Pollack argue about blurring the public/private boundary?

A

Many public sectors like head teachers leave to work for private sector education businesses. These companies bid for contracts to provide services to schools
* Pollack argues this allows companies to buy ‘insider knowledge’ to win contracts

23
Q

Privatisation in education

What does Ball argue about privatisation and the globalisation of education policy?

A

Many private companies are foreign-owned. Edexcel is owned by the US educational publishing and testing giant Pearson.
* Ball argues some Pearsons GCSE exam answers are now makred in Sydney.

24
Q

Privatisation in education

What does Molnar argue about the cola-isation of schools?

A

The private sector is penetrating education indirectly, E.g. vending machines on schools premises to develop brand loyalty through logos and sponsorships
* Molnar argues schools are targeted by private companies because schools carry goodwill and can confer legitmecy on anything associated with them, like a product endorsement.

25
Q

Privatisation in education

How does Beder criticise the cola-isation of schools?

A

Schools involvment is limited.
* UK families spent £110,000 in tesco supermarkets in return for a single computer for schools

26
Q

Privatisation in education

What does Ball argue about education as a commodity?

A

Ball concludes that a fundemental change is taking place in which privatisation is shaping education policies. Policy is increasingly focused on moving to be provided by private companies.