legal aspect of substance use Flashcards

1
Q

what 3 steps of establishing liability for criminal offence?

A
  1. A guilty act( actus Reus (action)
    2.A guilty mind (Mens Rea (intention)
    3.No defence (no legal excuse)
    this will lead to criminal liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

why is a guilty mind important ?

A

1.Individuals should be held accountable for their action if they are acting on their autonomous wish.
2.Impaired capacity = impaired autonomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 3 types of mental capacity for criminal responsibility?

A
  1. cognitive capacity
    2.volitional capacity
    3.capacity for emotion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive capacity

A

involves rationality and knowledge for understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Volitional capacity

A

the ability to control oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Capacity for emotion

A

referred to as an affective capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a general defence?

A

dealing with mental condition of the defendant at the time that the offence was committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the rationale of the insanity defence?

A

‘the principle that criminal punishment should only be imposed upon those who are responsible for their conduct’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the (The M’Naghten rule?

A

There is a presumption that every man is sane;
This presumption can be rebutted by the defendant who must prove, on a balance of probabilities, that at the time of committing the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who made the insanity test?

A

(The M’Naghten rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the 2 reasonings of The M’Naghten rule?

A

accused was suffering from a detect of reason caused by a disease of the mind=
1. that he did not know the nature and quality of the act
or
2. that he did not know that what he was doing was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is insanity?

A

Requires proof of an internal factor (of those which originate from ‘within’ the individual); expert evidence will be required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are 3 examples of insanity?

A

1.sleepwalking;
2.epilepsy
3.brain tumour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 2 critics of insanity defence?

A

1.stigmatising terminology
2.language out of step with modern psychiatry thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when was statutory defence induced?

A

Homicide Act 1957 as a result of criticism of the defence of insanity.
-only available to murder only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

in statutory defence what will the partial defence , successful plea of diminished responsibility reduce

A

defendants liability to manslaughter

16
Q

what are the elements of the defendants responsibility?- the defence must prove that…

A

defendant was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning:
arising from a recognised medical condition- which impairs defendants ability to understand nature of his conduct -form a rationale judgement or exercise self control
-or provides an explanation for the defendant’s actions in the killing or is a significant factor contributing to the defendant’s conduct

17
Q

Diminished responsibility:elements: abnormality of mental functioning- what 2 things does this function include?

A

1.Involves internal processes and faculties
2.A legal construct rather than a psychiatric term

18
Q

in diminished responsibility what 2 things does recognised medical condition include?

A

1.The abnormality of mental functioning must be supported by medical evidence
2.Medical evidence is important, but jury will decide.

19
Q

can voluntary intoxication be a defence on its own

A

no
may negate the mens rea of an offence

20
Q

what 2 things is in involuntary intoxication ?

A

1.not aware that one is consuming alcohol or drugs, or
2.not at fault in taking a drug, unaware of the effect it will have on oneself.

21
Q

what 2 modals can be used to conceptualise the nature of addiction?

A

1.choice modal
2.disease modal

22
Q

Disease modal

A

Has a strong neuroscientific focus ;addiction is a chronic and relapsing brain disease.

23
Q

Choice model

A

Focuses on the natural recovery and the environmental correlates to quitting addiction;addiction is a consciously willed behaviour.

24
Q

what is the concept of ‘mens rea’?

A

guilty mind