genetic and neural explanations of OB Flashcards

1
Q

what are the different components of the genetic explanation

A

twin studies (inc adoption studies)
diathesis stress and epigenetics
candidate gene studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what do genetic exps assume: that criminality is the result of …

A

an inherited characteristic
proposing that one or more genes predispose individuals to criminal B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the examples of twin studies

A

lange
christiansen
raine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

lange twin study: investigated … MZ and …. DZ twins, where one of the twins…

they then explored how many of them…

and what did they find and what does this conclude

A

13mz
17dz

where one of the twins in each pair had served time in prison

and then explored how many of them had a co-twin who had also spent time in prison (concordance rate)

found no with cotwin in prison:
10 for mz
2 for dz

therefore suggests that genetic factors must play a predominant role in OB AND the more genes shared the more similarity in conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are limitations of lange’s twin study

A

the sample size is small and so there is a lack of generalisability

they judged whether the twins were mz/dz based off appearance and not off a dna test and so this could lead to a lack of validity. (there are some mz twins who dont look the same and so could be thought of as dz)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

christiansen explored the concordance rate of offending in mz and dz twin pairs

they had …. mz pairs and …. dz pairs
concordance rates were…

and what does this support the view of…
but what is the problem with these results

A

87 mz pairs , ccr = 33%
147 dz pairs, ccr = 12%

supports he view that OB may have a genetic component

BUT you would expect mz twins to have a higher if not 100% ccr and so this suggests that other factors have a role and it isnt due to genetics entirely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

raines twin evidence, raine reviewed delinquent B of twins and found what ccr for mz and dz

what are limitations of this

A

mz ccr- 52%
dz ccr- 21%

delinquent b is very broad and so this was not operationalised, so the difference in rates could be due to type of delinquency/how it was measured, delinquent not necessarily convicted so the difference could be due to convicted vs not

the sample was also very small so cant necessarily generalise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are general lims of twin studies: cant separate

A

the role of genetics and the E and MZ have a more similar E and so this doesnt represent how others see the world, dz because they look different they may be treated different and so that could be a reason the ccr was less as they have more different experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the examples of adoption studies

A

crowe
mednick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

mednick studied … adoptees and looked at their risk of OB

what was the % of adopted sons who went on to be criminals

A

with both adoptive and bio parents having criminal convictions: 24.5%

bio crim parents- 20%

crim ad parents- 15%

neither bio nor ad parents had criminal convictions- 13.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are lims of mednick

A

they didnt look at daughters and so by not separating this is could act as confounding variable, ie results could be because sons offend more than daughters.

only petty crime was studied so cant generalise to serious crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did crowe find- adoption study

adoptees risk of having a criminal record by age 18 for having either a biological or adoptive parent with a criminal record

A

biological- 50% greater risk
adoptive- 5% risk

suggests that inherited genes are a marginally more significant factor than E influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the lims of adoption studies

A

adoption could happen at any ages, the reason for adoption could be because the parent is in prison, could still be eg visiting biological parent, more traumatic when older &raquo_space; E factors

cant separate all factors so assumes the role of genetics and the E

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the components of the neural exp of OB

A

regions of the brain
mirror neurones
neurotransmitters

17
Q

what is APD

A

antisocial personality disorder (formerly psychopathy) and most evidence for neural exp comes from offender with ADP.

characterised by lack of empathy, reduced emotional responses, and it characterises many criminals

18
Q

what is the evidence regions of the brain: raine cited … brain imaging studies showing …

also raine found …% reduction in

prefrontal cortex

A

71 showing offenders (murderers, psychopaths, violent individuals) have decreased functioning in the prefrontal cortex

11% reduction in volume of grey matter in prefrontal cortex of people with APD compared to controls

19
Q

what is the prefrontal cortex involved in

A

regulating emotion and controlling moral B, a decrease in activity = impulsiveness and loss of control

20
Q

what is the evidence regions of the brain: raine found that … who were found ….

limbic system

A

murderers who were found not guilty by insanity, compared to control, were found to have abnormal asymmetries in limbic system, especially the amygdala having reduces activity on the left and increased on the right

21
Q

what is the limbic system responsible for

A

it is a set of subcortical structures including the hypothalamus, amygdala. it is linked to emotion and motivation

22
Q

what are mirror neurones

A

an exp that says that criminals with APD can exp empathy but more sporadically then everyone else

christian keysers found that criminals could empathsise when asked to (when shown a video of a person in “pain”) and this activates an empathy reaction suggesting APD can have a neural switch controlled by mirror neurones whereas a normal brain has empathy permanently on

23
Q

what is the evidence for neurotransmitters: serotonin, seo suggested that ..

A

low serotonin levels predispose individuals to impulsive aggression > ob, this is because low S > lack of inhibition of impulsive aggressive urges by the prefrontal cortex

dopamine hyperactivity may enhance this effect

24
Q

what is the evidence for neurotransmitters: noradrenaline

A

very high OR very low noradrenaline levels is associated with aggression, violence and criminality (Wright)

very high: causes activation of the sns and the f/fr which leads to aggression

very low: reduces ability to react to perceived threats

25
what is the evidence about the relationship between brain injury and criminality
is it commonly observed that criminals report having some head injury (in general 8.5/% of the US pop have a brain injury compared to 60% in US prisons (harmon) therefore brain differences may be due to nurture, or they may be inherited (nature)
26
strength of neural exp: rwa, methods of treatment
if low serotonin levels are related to increased aggressiveness in criminals, could be given special diets that enhance their serotonin and so aggression is decreased artificial sweeteners are high in phenylalanine and low in tryptophan both of which make the production of serotonin difficult therefore this suggests that drugs and or changes in diet could be used to help some individuals
27
limitation of neural exp: it is based on research into aggression rather than OB (what are the impacts of this generally in terms of the use of the research)
eg for studies into neurotransmitters it is aggressiveness being studied NOT criminality so validity is reduced. also some studies use non-human animals which undermines the potential relevance of the info in relation to understanding OB also with genetic evidence, there is not 100% correspondence with any of the brain or neurotransmitter. therefore the data cannot be used to predict who might become an offender and the research cannot be generalised to non-violent crimes
28
limitation of neural exp: issues about c +e, one issue is about whether abnormalities
one issue is about whether abnormalities in regions of the brain or levels of neurotransmitters are the cause of OB, the result of OB or just an intervening variable. research only highlights a correlation between head injuries and later criminality. eg someone who grew up in a violent household might be more likely to suffer head injury, so the link between head injury and OB could be because of a violent childhood therefore neural exps only highlight an association not a causal link with crime
29
30
31
32