22: Khrushchev years part 2- economic and social developments Flashcards
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: how much of the USSRs industrial capacity had been destroyed by ww2
70%
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: what effect did ww2 have on the ussrs workforce
severely reduced it
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: why did the USSR face a huge defence budget
as it policed its new satellite states and met the costs of the emerging cold war
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: what did stalin refuse to allow territories under soviet influence to receive in 1947
US marshall aid
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: why did stalin establish cominform
to counter western propaganda
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: why did stalin establish comecom
to link the eastern European countries that formed the soviet bloc economically
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: why did the redistribution of industry in the war years provide a broad base for industrial recovery
expanded eastern industrial areas permitted exploitation of new sources of raw materials and energy
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: what was essential to rebuild
the devastated western areas
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: what did gosplan coordinate to meet soviet needs
two more 5yp following the same target setting methods that had been used before the war
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: fourth 5yp
1946-50
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: aims of fourth 5yp
- catch up with USA
- rebuild heavy industry and transport
- revive Ukraine
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: detail of 4th 5yp
- use of extensive reparations from East Germany
- maintenance of wartime controls on labour force- long hours, low wages etc
- ‘grand projects’- canals and HEP plants
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: results 4th 5yp
- USSR became second to USA in industrial capacity
- most targets in heavy industry met
- prod doubled and urban workforce increased
- by end 1947, Dnieper Dam power station in action again
- industrially stronger than pre war
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: 5th 5yp
1951-55
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: aims 5th 5yp
- continuation of development of heavy industry and transport
- post 1953, under Malenkov, consumer goods, housing and services received stronger investment
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: detail 5th 5yp
- continuation 4th 5yp but resources diverted to rearmament during Korean war
- after stalins death, Malenkov reduced expenditure of military and heavy industry
industrial development under stalin 1945-53: results
- most growth targets met
- national income increased 71%
- Malenkov’s changes met opposition resulting in hi loss of leadership 1955
industrial development under Khrushchev 1953-64: which issues were one of most hotly debated areas during leadership struggle after 1953
economic issues
industrial development under Khrushchev 1953-64: which Malenkov proposal did Khrushchev initially oppose
to move the economic focus away from heavy industry to light industry
industrial development under Khrushchev 1953-64: what effect did the industrial changes that K introduced when in power have
went some way to changing rigid Stalinist planning system that he inherited and also took steps towards developing new industrial areas
decentralisation and industrial planning: issues with Stalinist system: ministers in moscow
set different industrial targets for each enterprise
decentralisation and industrial planning: issues with Stalinist system: administrators
too few to make the system work properly
decentralisation and industrial planning: issues with Stalinist system: exceeding targets
- enterprises judged and given bonuses according to success in fulfilling output targets
- exceeding targets would mean targets raised next year
- managers preferred to play safe, hide productive capacity of their enterprises and avoid too much innovation and improvement
decentralisation and industrial planning: issues with Stalinist system: disincentive to modernisation
- output targets assessed usually by weight
- heavy goods favoured over lighter ones
- regardless of what consumers wanted