observational techniques- research methods Flashcards
naturalistic and controlled observations
naturalistic- take place in the setting or context where target behaviour usually occur, aspects of environment free to vary
controlled- control certain aspects, some control over variables and control of confouding or extraneous variables
covert and overt observations
covert-behaviour recorded wihtout obtaining consent, pps unaware they are the focus of th study and their behaviour observed in secret, must be public and happening anyway for it to be ethical
overt-pps know their behaviour is being observed and have given their informed consent before
participant and non participant observations
pp- observer becomes part of group
non pp-researcher remains separate from those they are studying and records behaviour in more objective manner
all observations eval
+capturing what people actually do which may be unexpected behvaiour, do not act the same as theysay they would
+ special insight into behaviour
- observer bias- interpretation of situation may be affected by their expectations
- cannot demonstrate causal relationships
naturalistic eval
+ high external validity findings can be generalised, behaviour studied within the environment where it would normally occur
- replication difficult lack of control, uncontrolled confounding or extraneous variables that make it more difficult to judge pattern of behaviour
controlled eval
- produce findings cant be as readily applid to veeryday life
+ confounding or extraneous variables less of a factor so replication becomes easier
covert eval
+ removes demand characteristics and ensures any behaviour will be natural, increases internal validity
-ethics questionned, may not wish to have their behaviours noted
overt eval
+ethically acceptable
- knowledge pps have that they are being observed may act as a significatn influence on their behvaiour
pp eval
+researcher can experience situation as pps do giving them increased insight into lives of the people being studied, increase external validity of the findings
- researcher may come to identify too strongly with those they are studying and lose objectivity, refer to this as adopting local lifestyle when the line between researcher and being pps becomes blurred
non pp eval
+ allow researcher maintain objective psychological distance from pps so less o danger adopting local lifestyle
- lose valuable insight to be gained in pp observation as they are far too removed from he people and behaviour theyre studying