Modern Liberalism (late 19th Century-present) Flashcards
What time era was the modern liberalism period in?
Late 19th century- present
Mill did not just offer solutions to the dilemmas of liberalism in the late nineteenth century; he also
raised a number of possibilities that later liberals could develop.
A particular possibility that Mill raised, later liberals could develop
Mill’s notion of individuality began to prompt fresh questions about the precise nature of ‘liberty
Mill’s notion of individuality began to
prompt fresh questions about the precise nature of ‘liberty’
What were some of the questions Mills notion of individuality raised about the precise nature of ‘liberty’?
In order to liberate an individual’s potential, was it really enough just to leave them alone as supporters of negative freedom would argue)?
Was it enough for the state simply to guarantee equal political rights and equality before the law?
Answer to the questions Mills notion of individuality raised about the precise nature of ‘liberty?’
The answers to such questions would produce a new and radical interpretation of what liberty involved, one that would lead to a very different form of liberalism. It was one that had a number of distinguishing characteristics.
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a number of English philosophers were known as the ..?
‘new liberals’
During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, what did a number of English philosophers — later known as the ‘new liberals’ — do?
re-examined the core principles of liberalism and reached radical conclusions about liberty, individualism and society
Positive freedom
A vital aspect of modern liberalism, this term denotes the belief that individuals left alone are often inhibited rather than
‘free’. Such individuals may need enabling so that they are ‘free’ to exercise their individual talents.
Which three ‘new liberals’ were prepared to argue that: modern, advanced societies made a mockery of the idea that individuals were innately autonomous?
T.H. Green (1836-82)
L.T. Hobhouse (1864-1929)
J.A. Hobson (1854-1940)
What were T.H. Green (1836-82), L.T. Hobhouse (1864-1929) and J.A. Hobson (1854-1940) prepared to argue?
were prepared to argue that: modern, advanced societies made a mockery of the idea that individuals were innately autonomous.
What did T.H. Green (1836-82), L.T. Hobhouse (1864-1929) and J.A. Hobson (1854-1940) argue about the nature of modern economics and society?
The nature of modern economics and society, they argued, meant individuals were increasingly subject to socio-economic forces beyond their control. Such forces would then make it impossible for affected individuals to seek self-determination and self-realisation, even though they might not have caused the socio-economic problems now restricting their liberty.
As a result these new liberal T.H. Green (1836-82), L.T. Hobhouse (1864-1929) and J.A. Hobson (1854-1940) argued that ?
As a result these new liberals argued that social justice, as well as legal justice, was now required if individuals were to fulfil their potential.
What did the notion of new liberals arguing that social justice, as well as legal justice, was now required if individuals were to fulfil their potential lead to?
This led Green and others to revise the meaning of liberty, so as to make it a less ‘negative’ concept. In other words, instead of freedom being seen merely as the absence of restraint, it would now be interpreted as something more cooperative and altruistic, namely some individuals enabling or empowering other individuals.
Green and others new approach to revise the meaning of lie thy go make it a far less negative concept allowed what?
This approach - helping others to help themselves — would then allow certain individuals to act in a way that would have been impossible had they simply been left alone: a concept that became known as positive freedom.
The new liberals thus asserted that individuals had to be
enabled in order for them to be free from socio-economic problems (such as poor health care, unemployment or a lack of education) and for social justice to be secured.
The new liberals thus asserted that individuals had to be enabled in order for them to be free from socio-economic problems but this raised…?
But this raised an obvious question: how might this ‘enabling’ take place? This leads to the second feature of modern liberalism.
Earlier in the chapter, classical liberalism was strongly associated with the idea of what type of government ?
As we saw earlier in the chapter, classical liberalism was strongly associated with the idea minimal government — one that was closely linked to a belief in ‘negative’ liberty.
By contrast to CL, modern liberalism had no qualms about
claiming that only a larger state could repel the new, socio-economic threats to freedom and individualism.
Modern liberals like who found themselves justifying a substantial extension of the state
John Rawls (1921-2002)
What did modern liberals like John Rawls (1921-2002) found themselves justifying ?
a substantial extension of the state in the name of individual liberty: more laws, more state spending, more taxation and more state bureaucracy. In short, this brand of liberalism became strongly linked to collectivism
Modern liberals like John Rawls found themselves justifying a substantial extension of the state in the name of individual liberty what did this brand of liberalism become strongly linked to?
this brand of liberalism became strongly linked to collectivism
What does substantial extension of the state in the name of individual liberty look like?
More laws
More state spending
More taxation
More station bureaucracy
Bureaucracy
A system of government in which most of the important decisions are taken by state officials rather than by elected representatives
Enabling state
Linked to the notion of positive liberty, an enabling state was one that extended its activities so as to ‘liberate’ individuals from restrictive social and economic problems, thus ‘enabling’ them to fulfil their potential.
Having embraced collectivism, modern liberalism faced the charge
that it had betrayed the fundamental principles of classical liberalism and had seriously blurred the distinction between liberalism and socialism.
From who did modern liberalism faced the charge that it had betrayed the fundamental principles of classical liberalism ?
from liberal critics like Friedrich von Hayek
Later modern liberals, notably John Rawls, resisted such a suggestion, of modern liberal betraying fundamental principals of CL arguing
arguing that only an enlarged state could guarantee the equality of opportunity necessary to enable individual freedom.
Later modern liberals resisted such a suggestion, of modern liberal betraying fundamental principals of CL such as?
John Rawls