GP- Global Governance: Political & Economic-The role of global civil society and non-state actors Flashcards
1
Q
The Role of Global Civil Society and Non-State Actors
* Positive Roles:
A
- Charitable NGOs (e.g., International Red Cross, Oxfam) support global development projects.
- International foundations (e.g., Carter, Clinton, Gates) encourage sustainable development.
- Human rights NGOs (e.g., Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International) publicize human rights violations.
- Gender equality groups (e.g., Global Fund for Women) promote action.
- Environmental groups (e.g., Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace) raise climate crisis awareness.
- Social groups (e.g., Black Lives Matter) encourage debate on issues like racial inequality.
- Global opinion-formers (e.g., David Attenborough, Malala Yousafzai) promote action on global issues.
- MNCs (multinational corporations) can commit to corporate social responsibility (e.g., Disney, Microsoft).
2
Q
The Role of Global Civil Society and Non-State Actors
* Negative Roles:
A
- MNCs (e.g., H&M, GAP) can exploit workers in developing countries.
- MNCs (e.g., Shell) can cause environmental damage.
- The internet and social media can spread extremist views, fake news, and misinformation.
3
Q
Does Economic Global Governance Reduce Global Poverty?
- Arguments for “Yes”:
A
- ECOSOC’s MDGs and SDGs have made progress (e.g., reduced extreme poverty, increased access to safe water).
- The WTO has expanded membership and resolved trade disputes.
- World Bank SAPs can help developing countries benefit from global trade.
- The IMF provides emergency relief during economic crises.
- The reduction of poverty in developing nations shows a reduction in the north south divide.
4
Q
Does Economic Global Governance Reduce Global Poverty?
* Arguments for “No”:
A
- Global crises (e.g., COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, Ukraine war) have reversed progress.
- The WTO has limitations (e.g., failure of the Doha trade round, inability to resolve US/China trade war).
- World Bank SAPs are not always appropriate for developing countries.
- IMF austerity programs can harm vulnerable populations.
- Economic global governance does not fully protect workers’ rights or the environment.
- Economic growth is uneven, with sub-Saharan Africa benefiting the least.