Electoral Systems- First-Past-The-Post (plurality system) Flashcards

1
Q

Majority government

A

One party is in power and enjoys a majority of seats in the House of Commons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hung parliament

A

Occurs when no party has a majority of seats; either a minority government or a coalition government is formed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Coalition government

A

Where two or more parties are in power. While no party enjoys a majority of seats on their own, combining the seats of the parties in power gives them a majority of seats overall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minority government

A

One party makes up the government, but it does not have a majority of seats. It often governs by making deals with other parties to support it on key votes, which is what the Conservatives did with the DUP between 2017 and 2019.
Such deals are called ‘confidence and supply’ arrangements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Safe seat

A

A constituency where one party is so dominant that it is almost unthinkable that it will not win the seat at every election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marginal seat

A

A constituency where more than one party has a realistic chance of winning the seat at an election and the outcome of the election is likely to be close.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Winner’s bonus

A

First-past-the-post tends to reward those parties whose votes are highly concentrated and efficient, winning just enough votes in each constituency to win multiple seats. This phenomenon leads to the largest party having a disproportionate seat share compared to their national share of the vote.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tactical voting

A

When voters choose a candidate who might not have been their preferred choice in order to keep the candidate they least like from winning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Plurality

A

A term used to describe ‘the most votes’. If a candidate receives a plurality then they have won more votes than any other candidate. That does not mean that they have received an ‘absolute majority, which is what happens when a candidate wins 50%+ of the vote. Under FPTP, a winning candidate only requires a plurality of the vote, not an absolute majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

First-past-the-post

A

The electoral system used in UK general elections; the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins a seat in the House of Commons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The main features of FPTP:

A

+ The country is divided into constituencies.

+ Each constituency elects one Member of Parliament (MP).

+ Each party can nominate only one candidate to stand for election in each
constituency.

+ Voters have only one vote each and they choose their candidate by marking an X next to their favoured candidate’s name.

+ The winner of the election
is the candidate who wins more votes than any other candidate. This is known as a plurality.

+ The winner does not require an absolute majority (50%+) of the votes cast.

+ This system is used for elections to the Westminster Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The outcomes of FPTP include:

A

+ Many seats are safe seats, which means that the same party wins the seat at every election and there is no realistic possibility that any other party could win the seat.

+ Only a minority of seats are marginal seats, which are seats where more than one party has a chance of winning

+ The winning party often wins enough seats to govern on its own with a clear mandate; it tends to produce ‘strong government’. However, the 2010 and 2017 general elections did not produce this sort of result.

+ It discriminates in favour of parties whose vote is highly concentrated in one area (if a party’s vote is ‘efficient’). This phenomenon allows the winning party to enjoy a winner’s bonus.

+ It discriminates against parties whose vote is thinly spread throughout the country (those who secure only a few votes in each constituency).

+ Voters are more likely to engage in tactical voting.

+FPTP is therefore associated with a two-party system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of FPTP

A
  • usually a clear single winner

-close constituency

-accountability clear

-prevents extremist parties

-reflects regional differences

-simple choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advantages of FPTP
- usually a clear single winner

-example

A

FPTP usually produces a single clear winner that can form a majority government, with a clear mandate to govern.

Example: the Conservative Party won a commanding majority at the 2019 general election, winning a mandate to ‘get Brexit done’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantages of FPTP
-close constituency

-example

A

It produces one single representative for each constituency and so creates a close constituency-MP bond, with MPs gaining a reputation for standing up for constituents.

Example: in 2019, Jess Phillips MP stood outside a school in her Birmingham Yardley constituency to defend teachers who taught primary school children about LGBTQ+ relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Advantages of FPTP
-accountability clear

A

Accountability of the individual MP is clear to the electors.
Example: several MPs who represented constituencies that voted to leave the EU lost their seats at the 2019 general election after the MPs campaigned for a second referendum.

17
Q

Advantages of FPTP
-prevents extremist parties

-example

A

It helps to prevent ‘extremist’ parties from breaking into the system. Example: the British National Party received over half a million votes in the 2010 general election but failed to win a seat.

18
Q

Advantages of FPTP
-reflects regional differences

+example

A

The system helps to reflect regional differences in voter preferences. Example: the SNP is strong in Scotland, the Labour Party is strong in inner cities and the Conservative Party’s popularity is reflected by how many rural seats the party wins.

19
Q

Advantages of FPTP
-simple choice

A

Voters are faced with a simple choice — they simply place a cross next to their preferred candidate.

20
Q

Disadvantages of FPTP

A

-not always guarantee a winner

-outcome not proportional

-votes wasted

-political inertia

-unequal values of votes

-encourages tactical voting

21
Q

Disadvantages
-not always guarantee a winner

Example

A

FPTP does not always guarantee a clear winner and by extension a clear mandate.

Example: in 2010 and 2017 FPTP failed to give an absolute majority to any party but delivered a hung parliament instead. The Conservative Party had to form a coalition with the Liberal Democrats between 2010 and 2015 and govern as a minority government between 2017 and 2019.

22
Q

Disadvantages
-outcome not proportional

Example

A

The overall outcome is not proportional or fair. Some parties win more seats than their overall support warrants while others win fewer than they deserve.

Example: the Liberal Democrats won almost 12% of the vote in the 2019 general election but just under 2% of the seats.

23
Q

Disadvantages
-votes wasted

A

It means that many votes are effectively wasted because they can have no impact on the outcome in safe seats.
Many seats become part of party ‘heartlands’ where there is no possibility of a realistic challenge from other parties. It also produces ‘electoral deserts’ where there is effectively no party competition.

24
Q

Disadvantages
-political inertia

Example

A

It prevents new parties breaking into the system and so produces political ‘inertia.

Example: UKIP won broad support across the country in the 2015 general election with almost 4 million votes, yet it only secured one seat.

25
Q

Disadvantages
-unequal values of votes

Example

A

Votes are of unequal value in that votes in safe seats are less valuable than votes in marginal seats.

Example: the Electoral Reform Society estimated that almost three-quarters of votes in the 2015 election either went to losing candidates or were surplus to what the winning candidate needed to gain a plurality.

26
Q

Disadvantages
-encourages tactical voting

A

It encourages tactical voting among some voters and so they abandon the party they really want to support. Example: the Electoral Reform Society estimated that some 6.5 million voters engaged in tactical voting in the 2017 election.