LAW P1 CASES (theft + robbery) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the case for the AR of theft (S3)?

A
  • R v Morris, there was an interference of the owners rights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the case for the AR of theft (S4)?

A
  • R v Kelly and Lindsay, a corpse is not property but acquired body parts can be
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the case for the AR of theft (S5)?

A
  • R v Basildon magistrates court, the bags and their contents outside the shop remained the property of the donor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the case for the MR of theft (S2)?

A
  • Ivey v Genting casinos, a jury must decide whether what was done was dishonest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the case for the MR of theft (S6)?

A
  • R v Velumyl, the exact money could not be replaced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly