LAW P1 CRIM (CAUSATION) Flashcards
What is causation?
Causation is a set of rules which help determine whether a defendant is responsible for the prohibited consequence.
What are the two types of causation?
Factual and legal causation.
What is factual causation?
Factual causation consists of the but for test, which asks whether the prohibited consequence would have occured ‘but for’ the defendants conduct (an act or omission)
What is the case for factual causation?
R v White, the defendant is not guilty of murder as e was not the factual cause of the victims death
What is legal causation?
Legal causation consists of:
- de minimus principle
- novus actus interveniens
- Thin skull rule
What is the de minimus principle?
The de minimus principle states that it has to be shown that the defendant made more than minimal contribution to the consequence.
CASE - R v Kimsey, there was more than a ‘slight or trifling link’ between the defendants actions and the result caused.
What is novus actus interveniens?
Novus actus interveniens can be defined as an intervening act which has the potential to break the chain of causation and negate liablity.
Types of intervening acts:
- Acts of the victim
- acts of a third person
- unforeseeable natural events
CASE - R v Roberts, there was not something ‘unexpected’ that would sufficiently break the chain of causation
What is the thin skull rule?
The thin skull rule is the idea that the defendant must take their victim as they find them.
If the victim has any charactersitics that could worsen the injury, the defendant will be liable for the full extent of that consequence.
CASE - R v Blaue, the victim died due to the stab wounds the defendant inflicted.
