LAW P1 CRIM CASES (assault, battery, ABH, GBH) Flashcards

1
Q

What are the cases for the AR of assault?

A
  • Read v Coker, a threat of violence can amount to an assault
  • R v Ireland, silent phone calls can amount to an assault or psychiatric injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the cases for the MR of assault?

A
  • R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
  • R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the cases for the AR of battery?

A
  • Haystead v DPP, direct force can be applied through someone’s action, it doesnt require direct physical contact
  • DPP v K, battery can occur indirectly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the cases for the MR of battery?

A
  • R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
  • R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the cases for the AR of ABH?

A
  • R v Ireland, silent phone calls can amount to an assault or psychiatric injury
  • R v Miller, ABH includes not just physical injuries but also psychiatric injuries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the cases for the MR of ABH?

A
  • R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
  • R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the cases for the AR of GBH?

A
  • R v Eisenhower, there is a break in the continuity of skin needed for grievous bodily harm
  • DPP v Smith, the question is asked of would a reasonable man contemplate that the actions would lead to an offence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the cases for the MR of GBH?

A
  • R v Mowatt, the defendant should have foreseen consequences to his actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly