LAW P1 CRIM CASES (assault, battery, ABH, GBH) Flashcards
1
Q
What are the cases for the AR of assault?
A
- Read v Coker, a threat of violence can amount to an assault
- R v Ireland, silent phone calls can amount to an assault or psychiatric injury
2
Q
What are the cases for the MR of assault?
A
- R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
- R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
3
Q
What are the cases for the AR of battery?
A
- Haystead v DPP, direct force can be applied through someone’s action, it doesnt require direct physical contact
- DPP v K, battery can occur indirectly
4
Q
What are the cases for the MR of battery?
A
- R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
- R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
5
Q
What are the cases for the AR of ABH?
A
- R v Ireland, silent phone calls can amount to an assault or psychiatric injury
- R v Miller, ABH includes not just physical injuries but also psychiatric injuries
6
Q
What are the cases for the MR of ABH?
A
- R v Mohan, attempting to cause injury is an intentional offence
- R v Cunningham, the defendant should have foreseen that harm would occur and was therefore reckless
7
Q
What are the cases for the AR of GBH?
A
- R v Eisenhower, there is a break in the continuity of skin needed for grievous bodily harm
- DPP v Smith, the question is asked of would a reasonable man contemplate that the actions would lead to an offence
8
Q
What are the cases for the MR of GBH?
A
- R v Mowatt, the defendant should have foreseen consequences to his actions