Unit 2 Module 5 (review!!) Flashcards
In which version of IDEA was Assistive technology first introduced?
A. 1975 Version
B. 1990 Version
C. 1997 Version
D. 2004 Version
B. 1990 Version
Which version of IDEA first mandated that the assistive technology be provided at no cost to the student?
A. 1975 Version
B. 1990 Version
C. 1997 Version
D. 2004 Version
D. 2004 Version
What version of IDEA first mandated that IEP teams consider assistive technology for all students with disabilities?
A. 1975 Version
B. 1990 Version
C. 1997 Version
D. 2004 Version
C. 1997 Version
PL 45–186 authorized funding for the production of Braille materials by the American Printing House for the Blind. Louis Braille published the Braille code (Blackhurst, 2005a).
A. 1900
B. 1958
C. 1953
D. 1832
D. 1832
Electric amplifying devices for individuals with hearing impairments were introduced.
A. 1900
B. 1958
C. 1953
D. 1832
A. 1900
PL 85–905 provided funding to purchase and distribute closed-captioned films to state schools for the deaf. invention of devices to magnify printed material.
A. 1900
B. 1958
C. 1953
D. 1832
C. 1953
PL 90–247, Elementary and Secondary Education Amendments of 1968, legislated the provision of educational technology for students with disabilities.
A. 1973
B. 1968
C. 1975
D. 1988
B. 1968
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act was passed. It was the first federal civil rights protection for people with disabilities in the United States.
A. 1973
B. 1968
C. 1975
D. 1988
A. 1973
PL 94–142, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) passed, ensuring services to children with disabilities throughout the United States.
A. 1973
B. 1968
C. 1975
D. 1988
C. 1975
PL 100–407, Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act, also known as the “Tech Act,” passed.
A. 1973
B. 1968
C. 1975
D. 1988
D. 1988
PL 101–476, reauthorization of IDEA, passed. It included the Tech Act’s definition of assistive technology as well as provided for assistive technology if the Individualized Education Program (IEP) team determined it was needed.
A. 1998
B. 1997
C. 2004
D. 1990
D. 1990
IDEA was reauthorized again and mandated that IEP teams consider assistive technology for all students with disabilities, shifting the focus of assistive technology as primarily for students with more severe or low-incidence disabilities (for example, students with visual impairments or students with severe intellectual disability) to also include students with high-incidence disabilities, such as individuals with learning disabilities.
A. 1998
B. 1997
C. 2004
D. 1990
B. 1997
The Tech Act was reauthorized.
A. 1998
B. 1997
C. 2004
D. 1990
A. 1998
The Tech Act was reauthorized again as the Assistive Technology Act, and IDEA was reauthorized as The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.
A. 1998
B. 1997
C. 2004
D. 1990
C. 2004
SETT involves the identification and consideration of the student (for example, strengths, needs, preferences); the environments in which the student functions; and the tasks the student is expected to perform.
A. Matching Person and Technology (MPT)
B. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI)
C. Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT)
C. Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT)
The MPT framework also suggests that assistive technology devices or tools should match with the student (strengths, challenges, attitudes, and interests); work within the student’s contexts; and fit the student’s tasks (Bryant & Bryant, 2003; Raskind & Bryant, 2002; Scherer & Craddock, 2002).
A. Matching Person and Technology (MPT)
B. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI)
C. Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT)
A. Matching Person and Technology (MPT)
The WATI team developed an assessment system to help identify the types of technology that may benefit students with various disabilities, based on each student’s individual abilities and challenges, environments, and tasks (Gierach, 2009).
A. Matching Person and Technology (MPT)
B. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI)
C. Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT)
B. Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI)
The UKAT Toolkit provides resources in the form of worksheet-like pages for an IEP team to complete in order to guide the team through assistive technology decision making. (Lahm et al. (2002)
A. University of Kentucky Assistive Technology (UKAT) Toolkit
B. C. Student, Environments, Tasks, and Tools (SETT)
C. National Assistive Technology Research Institute (NATRI) Assistive Technology Planner
A. University of Kentucky Assistive Technology (UKAT) Toolkit