Unit 2 Module 4 Flashcards
1954
Educational segregation
Segregation of students by race ruled unconstitutional.
A. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
B. Diana v. State Board of Education
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
D. Mills v. Board of Education, District of Columbia
A. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
1972
Right to education
Extended the Pennsylvania decision to include all children with disabilities. Specifically established the constitutional right of children with exceptionalities to a public education regardless of their functional level.
A. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
B. Diana v. State Board of Education
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
D. Mills v. Board of Education, District of Columbia
D. Mills v. Board of Education, District of Columbia
1970
Class placement
Linguistically different students must be tested in their primary language as well as English.
A. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
B. Diana v. State Board of Education
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
D. Mills v. Board of Education, District of Columbia
B. Diana v. State Board of Education
1972
Right to Education
State must guarantee a free public education to all children with intellectual disability ages 6–21 regardless of degree of impairment or associated disabilities.
A. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
B. Diana v. State Board of Education
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
D. Mills v. Board of Education, District of Columbia
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
1974
Equal educational opportunity
A milestone case in the field of bilingual education. U.S. Supreme Court ruling noted that “there is not equality in treatment merely by providing students with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum; for students who do not understand English are effectively foreclosed from a meaningful education.” Decision significantly affected the education of culturally and linguistically diverse learners.
A. Armstrong v. Kline
B. Larry P. v. Riles
C. Tatro v. State of Texas
D. Lau v. Nichols
D. Lau v. Nichols
1979
Class placement
Landmark case parallel to the Diana suit. African American students could not be placed in classes for children with mild intellectual disability solely on the basis of intellectual assessments found to be culturally and racially biased. Ruling applies only to the state of California.
A. Armstrong v. Kline
B. Larry P. v. Riles
C. Tatro v. State of Texas
D. Lau v. Nichols
B. Larry P. v. Riles
1980
Extended school year
State’s refusal to pay for schooling in excess of 180 days for pupils with severe disabilities is a violation of their rights to an appropriate education as required by PL 94-142 (IDEA).
A. Armstrong v. Kline
B. Larry P. v. Riles
C. Tatro v. State of Texas
D. Lau v. Nichols
A. Armstrong v. Kline
1980
Related services
U.S. Supreme Court held that catheterization qualified as a related service under PL 94-142 (IDEA).
A. Armstrong v. Kline
B. Larry P. v. Riles
C. Tatro v. State of Texas
D. Lau v. Nichols
C. Tatro v. State of Texas
1999
Related services
U.S. Supreme Court expanded and clarified the concept of related services.
A. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
B. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
C. Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education
B. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
1989
Class placement
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a segregated class was an appropriate placement for a student with Down syndrome. Preference for integrated placement viewed as secondary to the need for an appropriate education.
A. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
B. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
C. Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education
C. Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education
1982
Appropriate education
First U.S. Supreme Court interpretation of PL 94-142 (IDEA).
A. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
B. Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F.
C. Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education
A. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley
Consider each of the following provisions and indicate whether it is a part of the ruling in Diana v. Board of Education.
If a student’s primary language was not English, he or she must be tested in both English and his or her primary language.
Yes
No
Yes
Consider each of the following provisions and indicate whether it is a part of the ruling in Diana v. Board of Education.
Culturally biased items should be eliminated from all tests used in the assessment process.
Yes
No
Yes
Consider each of the following provisions and indicate whether it is a part of the ruling in Diana v. Board of Education.
Using intelligence tests in the assessment process needed to take into account Mexican American culture.
Yes
No
Yes
Consider each of the following provisions and indicate whether it is a part of the ruling in Diana v. Board of Education.
Using IQ tests as the assessment measure for placing African American students with intellectual disability in special education was found to be discriminatory.
Yes
No
No
What landmark case declared segregation unlawful and laid the groundwork for increasing educational access for students with disabilities?
A. Armstrong v. Kline
B. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
C. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
B. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
Determine if each of the following issues was addressed regarding IQ testing and African Americans In the Larry P. v. Riles case.
IQ tests actually measure achievement rather than ability.
YES
NO
NO
Determine if each of the following issues was addressed regarding IQ testing and African Americans In the Larry P. v. Riles case.
The underlying assumption of IQ tests is the measure of one’s intelligence.
YES
NO
YES
Determine if each of the following issues was addressed regarding IQ testing and African Americans In the Larry P. v. Riles case.
IQ tests lead to classifications of more African American students with intellectual disabilities.
YES
NO
YES
Under which amendment of the U.S. Constitution did the court rule in the Brown v. Board of Education case that it was illegal to practice or arbitrarily discriminate against any group of people?
A. Fourteenth Amendment
B. First Amendment
A. Fourteenth Amendment
Jesse receives several evaluations done by an occupational therapist, a physical therapist, and a school psychologist.
A. Nondiscriminatory assessment
B. Parental participation
C. LRE
A. Nondiscriminatory assessment
Victor’s parents are invited to meet with all of the school staff who work with him to review the results of recent assessments.
A. FAPE
B. IEP
C. Parental participation
C. Parental participation
Sofia’s parents met with the school principal to review her records and also scheduled an evaluation with a private practice speech-language pathologist.
A. Procedural due process
B. LRE
C. Nondiscriminatory assessment
A. Procedural due process
For the upcoming school year, Nicole will be in a general education classroom and also have individual pull-out sessions with a reading specialist three times a week. She will also use a computer with graphic organizer software.
A. Procedural due process
B. LRE
C. Nondiscriminatory assessment
B. LRE
As a result of a comprehensive assessment, Ian will receive occupational therapy, physical therapy, and adapted physical education to assist him in benefiting from special education. Ian will also use a computer with an adaptive input device.
A. FAPE
B. IEP
C. Parental participation
A. FAPE
A report is written for Nate detailing his current level of performance, educational goals for the year, and a plan specifically designed to meet his needs.
A. FAPE
B. IEP
C. Parental participation
B. IEP
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
Requires assessment of assistive technology needs for each student.
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
Individual transition plan (ITP) required by age 16.
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
Services for preschoolers with disabilities.
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
Nondiscriminatory assessment.
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
A. Component of PL 94–142
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
A free appropriate public education (FAPE)
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
A. Component of PL 94–142
For each of the following, identify whether it was originally part of PL 94–142 or was a component of one of the IDEA reauthorizations between 1986–1997 that expanded and extended services for individuals with disabilities.
General educators are part of the IEP team.
A. Component of PL 94–142
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
B. Component of IDEA reauthorizations
Many state departments of education are moving toward performance-based standards with the focus on the learning outcomes of students and establishing educational equity among all learners.
True
False
True
The enactment of this law has ushered in an era of what is now commonly referred to as “high-stakes testing” or “high-stakes assessment.”
A. Is an Implication
B. Is Not an Implication
A. Is an Implication
Greater emphasis will most likely be placed on ensuring that pupils in special education are exposed to the general education curriculum and that their IEP goals align to those standards.
A. Is an Implication
B. Is Not an Implication
A. Is an Implication
Provides a free appropriate public education to children and youth with specific disabilities.
A. IDEA
B. Section 504
A. IDEA
Prohibits discrimination on the basis of a person’s disability in all programs receiving federal funding.
A. IDEA
B. Section 504
B. Section 504
Thirteen disabilities defined according to federal regulations plus state/local definition of developmentally delayed.
A. IDEA
B. Section 504
A. IDEA
Defined as a person with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity, who has a record of such impairment, or who is regarded as having such impairment.
A. IDEA
B. Section 504
B. Section 504