Issues and debates: holism and reductionism Flashcards
what is reductionism?
.breaking down a phenomenon into its constituent parts and ignoring the interactions/connections between parts
what are the 3 levels of explanation of reductionism?
.social and cultural explanation
.psychological explanation
.biological explanation
what are the 2 types of reductionism?
.biological reductionism
.environmental reductionism
what is biological reductionism?
.biological psychologists try to reduce behaviour to a physical level and explain it in terms of neurotransmitters, hormones, brain structure
what is environmental reductionism?
.behaviourists assume that all behaviour can be reduced to a stimulus and response
what is a strength to taking a reductionist approach?
reductionism is more scientific so gives psychology more credibility because objective evidence can be collected
what is a negative to taking a reductionist approach?
.oversimplifies behaviour and doesn’t explain why the behaviour is happening
what is holism?
.idea that human behaviour should be viewed as a whole integrated system and not as separate parts
who suggested in the 1920’s/30’s that ‘the whole is greater than the sum of its parts?’
gestalt psychologists
what do gestalt psychologists do?
.they adopt a holistic approach to perception: when we perceive something in the real world, we do so as a whole rather than as a collection of bits and pieces
which approach supports the idea of holism?
.humanistic approach
how does the humanistic approach support the idea of holism?
.the approach argues that humans react to stimuli as an organised whole rather than a set of stimulus-response links.
.it investigates all aspects of the individual as well as interactions between people
what is a strength to taking a holistic approach?
.gives a more complete understanding of behaviour and acknowledges interactions between people are important
what’s an example of where taking a holistic approach gave a more complete understanding of behaviour?
Zimbardos Stanford prison experiment -couldn’t be understood by studying the participants as individuals, it was the interaction between people and behaviour that was most important
what is a negative to taking a holistic approach?
.can’t get evidence for holism as it’s not scientific however humanists would argue that’s not a problem
how is taking a holistic approach not scientific?
.because behaviour cannot be studied in a lab because there are so many factors that could be influencing behaviour