Memory: eyewitness testimony (leading questions) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who conducted the study?

A

Loftus and palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim for study 1?

A

To see if an eyewitness’s memory of an event can be influenced by leading questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the sample for study 1?

A

-45 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure for study 1?

A

-participants shown 7 different video clips of a car crash
-asked to estimate the speed of the car
-participants were split into five groups and each group were asked a different critical question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the critical question for study 1?

A

‘How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which verb changed for every critical question?

A

‘Hit’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What different verbs were used?

A

-contacted
-hit
-bumped
-collided
-smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the estimated speeds for each verb?

A

-contacted: 32mph
-hit: 35mph
-bumped: 38mph
-collided: 39mph
-smashed: 41mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a strength to study 1?

A

-highly controlled lab study
-high reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were some negatives to study 1?

A

-response bias (don’t remember the speed but the verb acts as a clue)
-lacks ecological validity (yuille and cutshall found leading questions had no effect on witnesses to a real armed robbery)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the sample for study 2?

A

-150

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the procedure for study 2?

A

-shown videos of car crashes
-split into 3 groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the 3 groups asked for study 2?

A

-group 1: ‘how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?’
-group 2: ‘how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’
-group 3: control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the follow up question for study 2?

A

‘Did you see any broken glass’
-there was no broken glass in the video

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How long after the original study were they asked the follow up question?

A

-1 week later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the findings for study 2?

A

-group 1 were significantly more likely to incorrectly recall seeing broken glass

17
Q

What are some strengths to study 2?

A

-bigger sample
-removes response bias (week has passed and verb no longer biases their response)