Memory: eyewitness testimony (leading questions) Flashcards

1
Q

Who conducted the study?

A

Loftus and palmer (1974

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the aim for study 1?

A

To see if an eyewitness’s memory of an event can be influenced by leading questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the sample for the study?

A

-45 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the procedure for the study?

A

-participants shown 7 different video clips of a car crash
-asked to estimate the speed of the car
-participants were split into five groups and each group were asked a critical where the verb differed. eg: ‘smashed’, ‘contacted’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the critical question for the study?

A

‘How fast were the cars going when they hit each other?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which verb changed for every critical question?

A

‘Hit’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What different verbs were used?

A

-contacted
-hit
-bumped
-collided
-smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the estimated speeds for the verbs ‘contacted’ and ‘smashed’?

A

-contacted: 32mph
-smashed: 41mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was a strength to the study?

A

-highly controlled lab study so high reliability.
-real world application: improved legal system as police carefully wording interview questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were some negatives to the study?

A

-response bias (don’t remember the speed but the verb acts as a clue)
-lacks ecological validity (yuille and cutshall found leading questions had no effect on witnesses to a real armed robbery)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly