Forensic Psychology - 8. Psychological Explanations: 3. Cognitive Distortions Flashcards
What are cognitive distortions according to Gibbs et al?
Errors or biases in people’s information processing characterised by irrational thinking
What do offenders do due to cognitive distortions?
They attempt to rationalise or deny their crimes
What do cognitive distortions allow criminals to do?
Legitimise their behaviour and maintain a positive view of the self
Two examples of cognitive distortions
Hostile attribution bias
Minimalisation
What does hostile attribution bias suggest?
Suggests offenders misinterpret social cues and justify their actions
Example of hostile attribution bias
Thinking someone wants to fight you because they are rolling their sleeves up
Under hostile attribution bias, what is violence caused by?
Causes by the perception that other people’s acts are aggressive
Thinking of individuals with hostile attribution biaas
Always thinking the worst of people and situations
Who carried out research into hostile faces? When?
Wegrzyn et al (2017)
Participants of Wegrzyn et al’s study in hostile faces
62 males including 30 violent criminals, 15 with a history of sexual abuse and 17 non-criminals (control)
Method of Wegrzyn et al’s study into hostile faces
Participants shown 20 ambiguous faces and asked to them them out of how much anger and fear they were showing
Results of Wegrzyn et al’s study into hostile faces
Violent criminals rated the faces as angry more than the control group
What is minimalisation?
Downplaying the seriousness of an offence or justifying it
What will minimalisation reduce the feeling of for the offender?
Reduce the feeling of guilt
What type of criminals are particularly prone to minimalisation according to research?
Sexual offenders
Who conducted research support for minimalisation?
Kohlberg
Sample of Kohlberg’s study into minimalisaton
75 young American males aged 10-16 at start of study
Method of Kohlberg’s study into minimalisaton
Conducted a longitudinal study over a 12 year period
Findings of Kohlberg’s study into minimalisaton
Majority of criminals didn’t progress from the pre-conventional level of moral reasoning
What did Barbaree find about 26 imprisoned rapists?
98% exhibited some minimisation
54% denied they had committed an offence at all
40% minimised the harm they caused the victim
Positive evaluation for cognitive distortions: real-life application
Knowing that offenders potentially think differently to non-offenders is beneficial in the treatment of offenders through intervention programmes where offenders can be taught how to think rationally and how to correctly interpret social cues
Negative evaluation for cognitive distortions: potential
Cannot be used to identify potential offenders and even if you have a cognitive distortion, you aren’t going to necessarily turn to crime
Negative evaluation for cognitive distortions: source of behaviour
Cognitive distortions don’t allow the source of the behaviour to be identified (where it came from). Do cognitive distortions only come about after crime as a coping mechanism or do cognitive distortions cause crime?
Negative evaluation for cognitive distortions: research
Most research relies on the use of hypothetical stories to determine responses that are in a lab condition (E.g. seeing a picture of a face). This cannot be generalised to the wider population