Forensic Psychology - 7. Psychological Explanations: 2. Cognitive Explanations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

3 things that the cognitive approach focuses on

A

The way we think
How we process information
Our brains are like computers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Babies concept of right and wrong

A

Babies have no concept of right and wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happens to our morals as we age?

A

They develop and become more sophisticated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who investigated morality for this topic?

A

Kohlberg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who was Kohlberg most influenced by?

A

Piaget, who saw development as going through stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the levels of moral reasoning?

A

A series of stages than an individual uses to think about whether an action is right or wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many levels make up Kohlberg’s levels of moral reasoning? What are they?

A

3 levels:
1. Pre-conventional
2. Conventional
3. Post-conventional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many stages are in each level of moral reasoning?

A

2 stages are in each level (6 in total)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What 2 stages make up the pre-conventional level?

A
  1. Doing something because of fear of punishment
  2. Doing it for personal gain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What 2 stages make up the conventional level?

A
  1. Doing something according to the majority
  2. Doing it because it’s your duty/helps society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 2 stages make up the post-conventional level?

A
  1. Doing something even if it’s against the law because the law is too restrictive (E.g. illegal protesting)
  2. Doing it because of your inner conscience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What level of moral reasoning are most criminals classified at according to Kohlberg? Why is this?

A

Most criminals classified at pre-conventional level (level 1). This is because criminals are most likely to carry out crime if they think they aren’t going to get caught (stage 1) or because they are gaining some type of reward (stage 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Other than criminals, who is at the pre-conventional level of moral reasoning?

A

Children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When do people at the pre-conventional level of moral reasoning think crime is justified?

A

If the rewards outweigh the costs or if punishment can be avoided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When do people at the conventional level of moral reasoning think crime is justified?

A

If it helps maintain relationships (E.g. stealing to provide for their family)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When do people at the post-conventional level of moral reasoning think crime is justified?

A

If the law violates an individual’s rights, committing a crime will be justified

17
Q

Difference of levels of moral reasoning between criminals and non-criminals according to Kohlberg

A

Criminals have a lower level of moral reasoning than non-criminals

18
Q

What did Kohlberg aim to discover in his research?

A

Aimed to discover how moral reasoning changes as people grew older

19
Q

Sample of Kohlberg’s research

A

Sample made up of 72 Chicago boys aged 10-16

20
Q

How was Kohlberg’s study a longitudinal study?

A

58 boys were followed up at three-yearly intervals for 20 years

21
Q

Method of Kohlberg’s study

A

Each boy given a 2 hour interview where they were talked through 10 dilemmas

22
Q

Results of Kohlberg’s study

A

The reasons that the children gave for their decisions in the dilemmas changed as they got older

23
Q

Positive evaluation of the cognitive explanation: cultural universality

A

Kohlberg demonstrated that his moral stages were universal as he later studied children in Britain, Mexico, Turkey and USA

24
Q

Positive evaluation of the cognitive explanation: research between delinquents and non-delinquents

A

Palmer and Hollin compared moral reasoning between female non-offenders, male non-offenders and convicted offenders. Found that offenders showed less mature moral reasoning than the non-offenders

25
Q

Positive evaluation of the cognitive explanation: association of crime to level of moral reasoning

A

Thornton and Ried found pre-conventional moral reasoning tends to be associated with crimes such as robbery

26
Q

Positive evaluation of the cognitive explanation: real-life application

A

Understanding the importance of the levels of moral reasoning can be useful in shaping intervention programmes to prevent crime

27
Q

Negative evaluation of the cognitive explanation: alternative theory

A

Gibbs proposed an alternative thoery, stating that there are only two levels of moral reasoning

28
Q

Negative evaluation of the cognitive explanation: what may the level of moral reasoning actually depend on?

A

It may depend on the kind of offence committed

29
Q

Negative evaluation of the cognitive explanation: does moral reasoning necessarily lead to moral behaviour?

A

This theory is based on thinking instead of actual actions. Thinking in a certain way doesn’t mean you are behaving in that way (E.g. those who have high levels of moral reasoning may still commit petty crimes)

30
Q

Negative evaluation of the cognitive explanation: gender bias

A

Much of Kohlberg’s research focuses on males. This also leads to beta bias as it eliminates the potential differences between men and women