Criminal: Topic Four Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is topic four?

A

Psychology and the courtroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the key research for this topic?

A

Dixon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Dixon look into?

A

The role of accent and context in perceptions of guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What research method did Dixon use?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Dixon’s aim?

A

To test the hypothesis that a Brummie accent suspect would receive a higher rating of guilt than a suspect with a standard accent and also whether race or type of crime would make a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the sample in Dixon’s study

A

119 white undergrad students who participated due to course requirements (University College Worcester)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How long was the recorded conversation that the P’s had to listen to? (Dixon)

A

2 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the conversation based on? (Dixon)

A

A transcript of an interview in Birmingham Police Station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the suspect (Dixon)

A

A student in his 20s who spoke both accents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the example used of a blue collar crime?

A

Armed robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the example used of a white collar crime?

A

Cheque fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did P’s have to do after listening to the tape? (Dixon)

A

Complete a rating scale on a 7 point scale from innocent to guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What significant effect was found? (Dixon)

A

The suspects accent to the attribution of guilt by the P’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which accent was rated higher in guilt? (Dixon)

A

Brumie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What 3 way interaction was found?

A

Accent, race and crime type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which combination of factors created the most guilty suspect?

A

Brummie, black and blue collar crime

17
Q

What did Penrod and Cutler look into?

A

Witness confidence

18
Q

What resource did P’s have to analyse? (P&C)

A

A videotaped mock trial

19
Q

What was the IV? (P&C)

A

Whether the key female witness stated that she was 80% or 100% confident with what she had seen

20
Q

When the witness was 100% confident, what percentage of the jury found D guilty? (P&C)

A

67%

21
Q

When the witness was 80% confident, what percentage of the jury found D guilty? (P&C)

A

60%

22
Q

What did Castellow look into?

A

Attractiveness

23
Q

What were mock jurors asked to read? (Castellow)

A

A trial summary

24
Q

Describe the trial summary given to P’s (Castellow)

A

A 23 year old secretary was accusing her male employer of sexual harrassment

25
Q

What were the mock jurors shown to help them to decide whether D was guilty? (Castellow)

A

Photos of the claimant and the defendant

26
Q

What did Castellow find?

A

That when D was less attractive than V then he would more likely be found guilty than an attractive D

27
Q

What did Pennington and Hastie look into?

A

Story order

28
Q

What hypothesis were P and H testing?

A

That jurors are more easily persuaded by ‘story order’ than ‘witness order’

29
Q

What is story order? (P and H)

A

Presenting evidence in the sequence that events occurred

30
Q

What is witness order? (P and H)

A

Presenting witnesses in the order most likely to persuade a jury

31
Q

What did P and H find?

A

That story order was shown to be more persuasive than witness in prosecuting defendants

32
Q

What did Broeder look into?

A

Inadmissible evidence

33
Q

What was Broeder’s aim?

A

To examine the effect of information being ruled inadmissible by a judge

34
Q

What was Broeder’s main question?

A

Is it possible that for at least some jury members, being told to disregard info makes it even more important?

35
Q

What was the scenario given to people at the university of Chicago? (Broeder)

A

The case of a woman who was injured by a careless male driver

36
Q

What were the results from Broeder?

A

Insurance - $37,000
No Insurance - $33,000
Disregard no insurance - $46,000