Cognitive area: Loftus and Palmer Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of the study?

A

To investigate the effect of language on memory (in particular, leading questions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the research methods of Loftus and Palmer’s study?

A

Lab experiment and self report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the sample used in experiment one?

A

45 students from the University of Washington, Seattle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a strength of Loftus and Palmer’s sample? (experiment one)

A

Good sample size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the weaknesses of Loftus and Palmer’s sample? (experiment one)

A

9 per group may not show consistent effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the IV’s in experiment one?

A

Contacted, bumped, hit, collided, smashed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the DV in experiment one?

A

Speed estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many film clips were shown in experiment one?

A

7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How long was each film clip in experiment one?

A

5 - 30 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many of the clips in experiment one contained car crashes and what was the purpose of this?

A

4 of them in order to reduce order effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where were the films sourced from and what type of video were they? (experiment one)

A

Seattle Police Department safety promotion videos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

After each video what were P’s asked to do? (experiment one)

A

Give an account of what they had just seen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

After giving an account of what they had just seen what did P’s have to do?

A

Answer a set of questions (including a speed estimate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for ‘smashed’ condition?

A

40.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for ‘collided’ condition?

A

39.3mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for ‘bumped’ condition?

A

38.1mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for ‘hit’ condition?

A

34.0mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for ‘contacted’ condition?

A

31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What type of data was collected in experiment 1?

A

Ordinal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Conclusion: P’s aren’t good at…..

A

Estimating the speed of moving vehicles

21
Q

Conclusion: Intensity of the verb…..

A

Impacts speed estimates

22
Q

What affect did the leading questions have on P’s memory?

A

It altered it

23
Q

Outline how the P’s exhibited response bias

A

The wording of the question caused P’s to alter their answer to what they actually believed

24
Q

What was the experimental design used in experiment 2?

A

Independent measures

25
Q

Describe the sample used in experiment 2

A

150 students split into 3 groups of 50

26
Q

What were the 3 conditions for the IV in experiment 2?

A

Smashed
Hit
Control group

27
Q

What was the DV in experiment 2?

A

Speed estimates

Whether broken glass was reported or not

28
Q

What were participants required to do on the first day? (experiment 2)

A

To watch the film and then fill in the questionnaires

29
Q

What did the first questionnaire ask? (experiment 2)

A

To describe the accident and then answer a series of questions

30
Q

What was the critical question from experiment 2?

A

‘About how fast were the cars going when they hit/smashed into each other?’

31
Q

When did P’s return to complete part 2 of experiment 2?

A

One week later

32
Q

What did P’s have to do in part 2 of experiment 2?

A

Fill out a questionnarie

33
Q

What was the critical questions in part 2 of experiment 2?

A

‘Did you see any broken glass?’

34
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for the ‘smashed’ condition? (experiment 2)

A

10.46mph

35
Q

What was the mean speed estimate for the ‘hit’ condition? (experiment 2)

A

8mph

36
Q

How many P’s in the ‘smashed’ condition stated that they could see broken glass? (experiment 2)

A

16 out of 50

37
Q

How many P’s in the ‘hit’ condition stated that they could see broken glass? (experiment 2)

A

7 out of 50

38
Q

How many P’s in the control group stated that they could see broken glass? (experiment 2)

A

6 out of 50

39
Q

What two things did Loftus and Palmer conclude that word use will affect?

A

Speed estimates and affects p’s thinking of seeing broken glass

40
Q

What did Loftus and Palmer conclude that use of a more intensive verb will affect?

A

More intensive verb = higher speed and more likely to report broken glass

41
Q

What is Loftus and Palmer’s study a good piece of evidence for?

A

Reconstructive memory

42
Q

What 2 things did Loftus and Palmer propose memory is made up of?

A

Info from the original scene

Post-event info

43
Q

How did Loftus and Palmer uphold protection from harm?

A

Clips shown did not show gruesome or distressing images

44
Q

How did they break consent?

A

P’s weren’t fully aware of the experiment and believed it to be purely about memory

45
Q

How did they break the ethical guideline of deception?

A

There was mild deception about hypothesis as filler questions were used

46
Q

Was the study internally reliable? (standardised procedure and replicable)

A

Yes - high level controls and standardised instructions make it replicable

47
Q

Was the sample large enough to suggest a consistent effect? (external reliability)

A

Study 1 - No, only 9 in each group

Study 2 - Yes, 50 in each group

48
Q

What type of validity did the study lack?

A

Internal and ecological

49
Q

Why did the study lack internal validity?

A

P’s knew they were in a study so may have answered yes as they thought that’s what they were supposed to say