Clinical Reasoning Flashcards
where can clinical reasoning go wrong?
- Fail to think laterally – generate enough diagnoses
- Fail to appreciate the patient’s agenda
- Close down differential too soon
- Generate inappropriate working diagnosis
- Cognitive bias
strategies for developing skills in clinical reasoning
- Widening differential – surgical sieve
- Reading around presentation syndromes
- Deliberate practice
- Compare and contrast different diseases
- Processing to medical language to facilitate problem representation
- Considering red flags/must not miss diagnoses
hypothetico-deductive model of making a diagnosis
• Analytical reasoning
• Using information to generate ideas about possible diagnoses
o Epidemiology – age, gender etc
o Presenting symptoms
o Clarifying enquiry start with open questions
• Consider what aspects of the case do not fit the possible diagnosis
o Key and differentiating features
• Using focused questions to confirm or refute diagnosis
Turning a symptom into a diagnosis:
• Consider all the possible diagnoses
• Narrow it down to a likely ballpark
• Then using all available information, reduce DD to the one(s) that best fit the patient. Why do
you think these are the most likely diagnoses?
dual process theory model of making a diagnosis
• Intuition easy “pattern recognition” o Pathognomic presentation and using heuristics o System one thinking o Thinking fast • Deliberate analytical approach o Extensive information gathering, and hypothesis generation o System two thinking o Thinking slow
cognitive load theory model of making a diagnosis
• Human short-term working memory can only process so many pieces of information
simultaneously (7±2 or 4±2 depending on field)
• Memory chunks into larger units for easier storage and access
• Chunking uses long-term working memory which is believed to have endless capacity
illness scripts model of making a diagnosis
• Experts store a limitless number of packets of information in their brain known as illness
scripts, a different cognitive structure than novices use
• They are shaped by reading and refined by clinical experience
• Their structure facilitates compare and contrast thinking and access of information in a clinical
environment
• Reading in presentation syndromes may facilitate the development of illness scripts
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: anchoring
tendence to fail to adjust initial impression in light of later information
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: availability
judge diagnosis as being more likely if readily comes to mind. common things are common
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: confirmation bias
tendence to give preferential attention to confirming evidence for a diagnosis rather than disconfirming evidence
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: diagnosis momemtum
once diagnostic label becomes attached to patient it tended to stick
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: framing effect
how diagnosticians see things be strongly influenced by how they have been framed by other individuals
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: overconfidence bias
tendency to believe we know more than we do acting in incomplete information, intuitions or hunches
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: premature closure
accepting a diagnosis before it has been fully verified
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: search satisficing
call off search once something is found missing something else
the Murtagh Diagnostic model: triage cueing
patient triaged in a particular direction cues their subsequent management