Research Misc. Flashcards

1
Q

Describe Face validity

A

The extent that a tool measures what it is supposed to from a superficial perspective
(looking at yourself in the face, superficial without a deep dive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe concurrent Validity

A

Comparing a tool to the gold standard (comparing to another current tool)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe construct validity

A

How much does a tool measure an abstract concept
(construct=abstract ideas, does it match with the theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Content validity is what

A

How much does the tool measure the specific subject matter
(e.g does algebra test have algebra or geometry questions, getting deeper into the content)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Validity vs Reliability

A

Validity: How close to truth. This is why I say people ae not valid. They are far from truth

Reliability: How consistent are you. I say kyrie isn’t reliable b/c them 9 point games

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a quasi-experimental design

A

Research that seeks to establish causality without manipulation (no randomization)

compared to an experimental design when the independent variable is manipulated (difficult in PT because can’t hide intervention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the null hypothesis

A

Means No relationship between groups.

We want to DISPROVE THIS, meaning prove that there is relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Independent vs dependent

A

Input vs output/result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an alternate hypothesis

A

When there is a relationship between groups (typically what we want to be correct)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Normal curve

A

Would have mean, median and mode at same point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intra-rater vs inter-rater

A

Intra-rater in how likely is same person going to get consistent same results

vs

inter-rater is “between” diff researchers how consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Internal vs external validity

A

Internal validity - any other reasons for outcomes (confounding factors)

External validity - Is it generalizable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nominal scale

A

Named, no significance besides the given name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ordinal scale

A

E.g is Borg RPE scale. Subjective scale with order.

MMT grading. Cant tell exact difference just know order/direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Interval scale

A

Distance between each is meaningful. E.g is temperature or PH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ratio scale

A

An absolute zero.
E.g is weight no such thing as negative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

T-test

A

The degree to which TWO groups of data are different. (Means divided by variability of groups)

=Comparing the means of 2 groups to see how diff they are

*z test would be the same only unknown

18
Q

If P<0.05

A

Reject Null Hypothesis
This means there is a relationship which is what we are looking for

19
Q

If P>0.05

A

Accept Null hypothesis, there is no relation or change that comes due to independent variable

20
Q

Chi-squared test (X^2 test)

A

Assesses difference between observed and expected values to determine how they are or are not related.

21
Q

Pearson Correlation Coefficient

A

Positive correlation: x and y increases. Notice line goes up from left to R

Negative correlation: y increases as x increases
Notice line goes down from R to L

No correlation: random points = 0.0

-1 to 1

closer to -1 or 1 means stronger and more linear in either direction

22
Q

Regression analysis

A

using correlation coefficients to predict values

23
Q

What percent of people fall within 2 SD

A

95

23
Q

Standard deviation

A

Determining how far off value is from mean

T-score for bone uses this

-1 to 1 is healthy

-1 to -2.5 is osteopenia

less than -2.5 is osteoporosis

Use 50 percent to assist you on SD math questions

23
Q

what percent of people fall within 1 SD in normal curve

A

68

24
Q

What percent of people fall within 3 SD

A

99.7 (more spread out)

25
Q

ANOVA Testing

A

Analyzing 3 more data sets

26
Q

Sensitivity

A

% if pt Correctly identified positives

What percent of true positives were detected

SnOUT
High SENsitive test NEGative result can be confidently ruled OUT

27
Q

Specificity

A

% of pt Correctly identified negatives

What percent of true negatives were detected

SpIN

High SPecificity and POSitive result means can be confident that positive rules IN

28
Q

Likelihood ratio

A

Determines how much a diagnostic test increases or decreases likelihood of having condition

29
Q

+LR

A

Indicates a positive test rules in (higher the number the greater the likelihood that it rules in) starting at 1

30
Q
  • LR
A

Indicates a negative test rules out (lower the number the greater the likelihood that it rules out) starting at 1and decreased towards 0. the smaller the greater likelihood

31
Q

Z-score

A

Strictly used SD to describe how far from mean (compared to population NOT norms )

32
Q

T score

A

Compares individual to normative value NOT population (e.g healthy individual) with SD

of sample pop

e.g for bone density T score

33
Q

Alpha level

A

Determined by researchers…what is the set level for probability of rejecting null hypothesis when it is actually true. Usually set at <0.05

34
Q

P level

A

The probability of that results are lucky/due to chance if hypothesis is true. meaning typically less than 5% chance that it null hypothesis is true due to luck

If p value is less than alpha level, you rject the null hypothesis

35
Q

List levels of research from most reliable/least bias to least reliable/most bias

A
  1. Systematic Review (:
  2. RCT
  3. Cohort study
  4. Case control
  5. Cross sectional/survey
  6. Case report
    7 Mechanistic studies
  7. Editorial/ expert opinion
36
Q

Type 1 error does what

A

Rejects the null hypothesis when null hypothesis is true (false positive)
e.g Telling someone they have ACL tear when they do not
This is false positive b/c your fall is about what is true

37
Q

Type 2 error does what

A

Accepts null hypothesis when it is false (not true)
False negative

False either way cause its an error. This is false negative b/c its a double negative

e.g Telling someone they do not have an ACL year hen they do

38
Q

MCD vs MCID

A

MCID: Smallest change that would be important to patient
Thats why its minimal CLINICALLY important difference

MCD: smallest amount of change that can be detected and is reliable

50 meter change is MCID for 6MWT

39
Q

NNT

A

Number needed to treat to prevent one bad outcome

The ideal number is 1 (meaning each treatment is effective at preventing a negative outcome)

40
Q

Case studies

A

Are for describing a single phenonomenon