Psychology Unit 9 Flashcards
Social psychologists focus on the
situation
Social Psychology
The scientific study of how we think about, influence, and relate to one another
The study of social influences explains why
the same person acts differently in different situations
Who proposed attribution theory
Fritz Heider
Attribution Theory
The theory that we explain someone’s behavior by crediting either the situation or the person’s disposition
Situational attribution vs. Dispositional Attribution
Disposition: Attribute to a person’s stable traits
Situational: Attribute to the situation
Fundamental Attribution Error
The tendency for observers, when analyzing others’ behavior, to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personal disposition
Summary of FAE
Overestimate: influence of personality
Underestimate: influence of the situation
What factors affect our attributions?
- Culture: individualist nations attribute behavior more to traits. East Asian cultures are sensitive to situation.
Self-serving bias in FAE
We are sensitive to when the situation influenced our own bad behavior
We most often commit FAE when
Strangers act badly
Two important exceptions to our view on our actions
- We attribute our deliberate admirable actions to our good reason and not the situation
- As we age, we tend to attribute our younger selves’ behavior to mostly our traits
Those who reflect on the power of choice are more likely to think
that people get what they deserve
Attitude
Feelings, often influenced by our beliefs, that predispose us to respond in a particular way to objects, people, and events
Attitudes affect our actions but actions do not affect our attitudes (T/F)
F, Two-way road
What can override attitude-action connections?
Strong peer pressure (ex. Republicans publicly supporting trump)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model
Suggest that efforts to persuade generally take to forms:
1. Peripheral Route Persuasion
2. Central Route Persuasion
Peripheral Route Persuasion
Occurs when people are influenced by incidental cues, such as a speaker’s attractiveness
Central Route Persuasion
Occurs when interested people focus on the arguments and respond with favorable thoughts
Example of peripheral route persuasion
Hot model endorsing a lipstick
Example of central route persuasion
Fact that tanning leads to skin cancer
Foot-In-The-Door Phenomenon
The tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request
How does the foot-in-the-door phenomenon work?
People are less likely to say no after they have already said yes once to you
Cognitive dissonance
Role
A set of expectations (norms) about a social position, defining how those in the position ought to behave
Philip Zimbardo
Conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment
Conclusion of Stanford Prison Experiment
The longer to conform to a role, the more real and true to yourself it becomes
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
The theory that we act to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) we feel when two of our thoughts (cognitions) are inconsistent. For example, when we become aware that our attitudes and our actions clash, we can reduce the resulting dissonance by changing our attitudes
Who made the cognitive dissonance theory
Leon Festinger
Core of attitudes-follow-behavior principle
We cannot directly control all our feelings, but we can influence them by altering our behavior
Norms
Understood rules for accepted and expected behavior. Norms prescribe “proper” behavior
Chameleon Effect
Unconscious mimicking of noticed behavior by other people (yawning, looking up at the sky, etc.)
Mood Contagion
The chameleon effect for mimicking emotional tones
Mood linkage
The sharing of moods
Positive herding
Positive ratings generate more positive ratings
Conformity
Adjusting our behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard
Solomon Asch
Devised the Solomon Asch experiment
Solomon Asch conclusion
More than one-third of the time, the smart college students were willing to call the wrong answer succumbing to everyone’s previous answer
We are more likely to conform under these seven conditions
- Made to feel incompetent or insecure
- Are in a group with at least three people
- Are in a group where everyone else agrees (if just one other person disagrees, the odds of our disagreeing greatly increase)
- admire the groups status and attractiveness
- have not made a prior commitment to any response
- Know that others in the group will observe our behavior
- Are from a culture that strongly encourages respect for social standards
Normative social influence
Influence resulting from a person’s desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval
Informational social influence
Influence resulting from one’s willingness to accept others’ opinions about reality
Stanley Milgram
Conducted the Yale shock experiment
Stanley Milgram Findings
More than 60 percent complied all the way in the shock experiment
Milgram’s finding found that obedience is highest in these four conditions
- The person giving orders was close by and seems legitimate as authority
- The authority figure was supported by a powerful or prestigious institution
- The victim was depersonalized or at a distance, even in another room
- There were no role models for defiance
Social control vs. personal control
Social: The power of the situation
Personal: the power of the individual
Social psychology vs. Sociology
Social psychology: Explores situations and its effect on people
Sociology: Groups interacting with groups
Attitude is NOT knowledge because
knowledge is a TRUE belief
How do you change an attitude?
- Change the default reaction
- Change the belief about the stimulus
Looking Glass Effect
When we are aware of attitudes we let them guide us, and therefore do it more.
“Oh he said I’m loud so I guess I really am loud”
The looking glass effect helps us:
If you like someone’s behavior point it out. If you don’t, don’t! “You’re so mean” will not help
What is NOT cognitive dissonance
Simply holding two mutually exclusive beliefs
Ways people are predictable and unpredictable
Predictable: groups
Unpredictable: individuals
Automatic mimicry
Behavior is contagious and trained (evolutionary)