NP: Chapter 3 Neuropsychological research Flashcards
T of F: je moet altijd large scale group studies gebruiken voor NP research
false, want brain disorders can lead to specific effects in different people! all brain injuries etc are different!
daarom kunnen single case studies ook useful zijn
waar zijn single case studies vooral handig voor
voor generation of hypotheses
dissociation =
shows that subprocesses are independent of each other as each of them can be disrupted seperately
double dissociation: provides evidence for independence because both processes can be disrupted independently
difference fundamental and clinical research
fundamental = underlying disorders and related brain structures
clinical = classification of symptoms, measurements and follow-up of illness)
experimental tasks =
designed for research, can give more detailed info than the standard test battery
4 limitations of neuropsychological tests
- value of the conclusions is largely dependent on the quality of the tests and questionnaires
- test battery can contain only a limited amount of tests (logistic problems)
- we gaan uit van validity van tests, maar dit weten we nooit 100% zeker (meet deze test wel memory?)
- missing values: sometimes test batteries cannot be completed (fatigue, inability to perform a task etc) -> problems with analysing and interpreting the data
subtraction=
measuring the reaction time for a task that incorporates the psychological process in question, and the reaction time for a nearly identical task without this psychological process (dus zou minder lang moeten duren), and then subtracting the second from the first
who invented subtraction and how
frans donders:
3 conditions: 1) detection, 2) go/no go, 3) discrimination reaction time task.
hoe bereken je bij subtraction method
By subtracting the time required for simple detection from the time required for discrimination he obtained an estimate of the time required for the discrimination of stimuli; after all, detection and response were the same. Then he could subtract the go/no-go-time from the discrimination reaction time, resulting in an estimate of the time required to make a response. In both conditions, detection and discrimination were
the same.
hoe wordt de subtraction method nu gebruikt
vooral voor neuroimaging research, dan ipv de verschillende reaction times worden activatie scores in het brein gebruikt
limitation of subtraction method
the difference score is not always reliable
single dissociation=
when a manipulation leaves one cognitive function intact (A), and harms/affects another (B)
double dissociation =
when one manipulation leaves one cognitive function intact (A), and harms/affects another (B); but another manipulation does the opposite
double dissociation does not prove…
the independence of certain cognitive functions and their neural substrates
what does double dissociation show then?
it provides stronger evidence for independence
caramazza said…
loss of function following a lesion cannot be derived only from the behaviour, and not obv priori knowledge about the function of that location in the brain. we need to study the disrupted cognitive apparatus in individual patients.
3 designs for neuropsychological research tests
- compare to normative group (standardized scores) -> but you need good tests, soms lastig
- intra-individual: make participant do a lot of different tests, and compare those (but: healthy individuals also have different results per test, does not neccessarily indicate dysfunction)
- compare patient to control group that is matched with the patient on relevant characteristics
confounding factor of longitudinal research
(follow patients over time)
-> test-retest effect
cross sectional design =
data verzamelen van veel individuen op een moment
limitation of cross sectional design
gaat over de groep patienten, dus kan alleen prognoses maken over average course of the disease.
also: momentopname
also: geen oorzaak-gevolg relatie vast kunnen stellen!
problem of sponteneous recovery in research
is het probleem opgelost door treatment, of door spontaneous recovery?
hoe problem of spontaneous recovery tegengaan?
multiple baseline design: several pre-measurements zodat je zeker weet waar het effect vandaan komt
of control task
hawthorne effect =
when individuals improve/modify their behaviour in response to their awareness of being observed
cross over research design
longitudinal: a type of clinical trial in which all participants receive the same two or more treatments, but the order in which they receive them depends on the group to which they are randomly assigned.
item-specific training
train them in some items, not in others. then assess: if after treatment the performance only improved in items that were trained, you have an item specific effect
test-retest problem
door leren wordt je beter, maar lijkt dan alsof dit door de treatment komt
generalization in research
clinical relevance =/= significance
randomisation tests
Using a specific statistical technique, called a permutation or
randomisation test, the likelihood of obtaining a certain pattern of scores can be determined. What is the likelihood of this specific pattern emerging compared with all the possible permutations of the observed scores?