CP: Lecture 2 Flashcards

1
Q

different levels of explanation

A

complaints + symptoms = clinical trials
processes = experimental studies
physiology = fundamental research and psychoactive drugs

happens all at the same time!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

simple diathesis stress model

A

diathesis = genetic/biological predisposition

diathesis + stress -> complaints/symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

general model of psychopathology: distal factors

A

heritable predisposition, early experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

heritable predisposition =

A

genetics, temperament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

early experiences =

A

trauma, nurture, care, deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

proximal factors

A

strength & vulnerabilites
support & stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strenght and vulnerabilities

A

personality, coping, attributions, fenotype, schemas, cognition, neuroendocrine, attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

support and stress

A

trauma, stress, social, medication, therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

complaints and symptoms can affect…

A

support and stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wat hoort bij diathesis

A

heritable predispositions, strenght and vulnerabilites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wat hoort bij stress

A

early experiences, support and stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

relatie simpele model en general

A

simpele model repeats itself again and again -> self-fulfilling prophecy door positive feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evidence based practice 3 aspecten

A

individual clinical experience
best external evidence
patient values and expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

dodo bird effect =

A

alle technieken zijn effectief (maar doen wel wat anders)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

waardoor kan het dodo bird effect uitgelegd worden

A

effectivity:
15% technique
15% expectancy
30% therapeutic relationship
40% client variables and factors outside of therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the degree of influence posed by the client and therapist is inversely related to the potency of the therapeutic intervention

A

dus hoe meer invloed van client en therapist, hoe minder invloed van therapy

17
Q

carl rogers

A

client-centered therapy
listen, do not interrupt, summarize

18
Q

3 aspects van client centered therapy

A
  1. authenticity
  2. unconditional positive regard
  3. empathy

this way a client can self-actualize, become fully functioning (integrated personality)

19
Q

evidence client-centered therapy now

A

the factors are necessary but not sufficient

20
Q

albert ellis

A

early cognitive therapy

directive, point out errors, give advice

21
Q

nu cognitive therapy

A

directing questions, client zelf op het antwoord laten komen ipv het voorzeggen

22
Q

fritz perls

A

gestalt therapy: experiental therapy

directive, powerful, process oriented, here and now, integration of experience and material

23
Q

2 techniques of experiental

A
  • empty chair (roleplay)
  • therapist role: guiding, experiencing perspectives of others
24
Q

catharsis=

A

opwekken van krachtige emoties, emotional breakthrough

25
Q

wat is nu consensus over catharsis

A

bestaat niet echt. gestalt therapy kan daardoor juist voor meer anger zorgen (ipv het releasen).

26
Q

schema therapy

A

aanpassen van unconscious schemas, childhood trauma etc

27
Q

3 aspects of diagnosis case conceptualisation

A

context (what, who, where, when?)
development (origin, clients part, origin personality, what symptoms now?)
personality (typical patterns of reaction, underlying ways of thinking)

28
Q

classification heeft effect op..

A

self image
others perspective
insurance
treatment
problem definition

29
Q

pro’s of classification

A

common language
clarity: who are we helping?
evidence on classifications
without some grouping, no process in research

LEREN

30
Q

cons of classification

A

stigma
overdiagnosis (inflation)
medicalizing problems
time and culture dependent
heterogeneity
reification: abstract concept is interpreted as a concrete one