CP: Lecture 2 Flashcards

1
Q

different levels of explanation

A

complaints + symptoms = clinical trials
processes = experimental studies
physiology = fundamental research and psychoactive drugs

happens all at the same time!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

simple diathesis stress model

A

diathesis = genetic/biological predisposition

diathesis + stress -> complaints/symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

general model of psychopathology: distal factors

A

heritable predisposition, early experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

heritable predisposition =

A

genetics, temperament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

early experiences =

A

trauma, nurture, care, deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

proximal factors

A

strength & vulnerabilites
support & stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strenght and vulnerabilities

A

personality, coping, attributions, fenotype, schemas, cognition, neuroendocrine, attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

support and stress

A

trauma, stress, social, medication, therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

complaints and symptoms can affect…

A

support and stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

wat hoort bij diathesis

A

heritable predispositions, strenght and vulnerabilites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

wat hoort bij stress

A

early experiences, support and stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

relatie simpele model en general

A

simpele model repeats itself again and again -> self-fulfilling prophecy door positive feedback

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evidence based practice 3 aspecten

A

individual clinical experience
best external evidence
patient values and expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

dodo bird effect =

A

alle technieken zijn effectief (maar doen wel wat anders)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

waardoor kan het dodo bird effect uitgelegd worden

A

effectivity:
15% technique
15% expectancy
30% therapeutic relationship
40% client variables and factors outside of therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

the degree of influence posed by the client and therapist is inversely related to the potency of the therapeutic intervention

A

dus hoe meer invloed van client en therapist, hoe minder invloed van therapy

17
Q

carl rogers

A

client-centered therapy
listen, do not interrupt, summarize

18
Q

3 aspects van client centered therapy

A
  1. authenticity
  2. unconditional positive regard
  3. empathy

this way a client can self-actualize, become fully functioning (integrated personality)

19
Q

evidence client-centered therapy now

A

the factors are necessary but not sufficient

20
Q

albert ellis

A

early cognitive therapy

directive, point out errors, give advice

21
Q

nu cognitive therapy

A

directing questions, client zelf op het antwoord laten komen ipv het voorzeggen

22
Q

fritz perls

A

gestalt therapy: experiental therapy

directive, powerful, process oriented, here and now, integration of experience and material

23
Q

2 techniques of experiental

A
  • empty chair (roleplay)
  • therapist role: guiding, experiencing perspectives of others
24
Q

catharsis=

A

opwekken van krachtige emoties, emotional breakthrough

25
wat is nu consensus over catharsis
bestaat niet echt. gestalt therapy kan daardoor juist voor meer anger zorgen (ipv het releasen).
26
schema therapy
aanpassen van unconscious schemas, childhood trauma etc
27
3 aspects of diagnosis case conceptualisation
context (what, who, where, when?) development (origin, clients part, origin personality, what symptoms now?) personality (typical patterns of reaction, underlying ways of thinking)
28
classification heeft effect op..
self image others perspective insurance treatment problem definition
29
pro's of classification
common language clarity: who are we helping? evidence on classifications without some grouping, no process in research LEREN
30
cons of classification
stigma overdiagnosis (inflation) medicalizing problems time and culture dependent heterogeneity reification: abstract concept is interpreted as a concrete one